Competency Gaps Among Governmental Public Health Employees With and Without a Certification in Public Health.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
MaKenzie Gee, Heather Taylor, Valerie A Yeager
{"title":"Competency Gaps Among Governmental Public Health Employees With and Without a Certification in Public Health.","authors":"MaKenzie Gee, Heather Taylor, Valerie A Yeager","doi":"10.1097/PHH.0000000000002189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study is to examine competency gaps among governmental public health workers with and without the Certified in Public Health (CPH) credential, specifically among the majority of the workforce without a formal public health degree.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This cross-sectional study uses 2021 Public Health Workforce Interests and Needs Survey (PH WINS) data. Multivariate logistic regressions of reported skill gaps were performed while controlling for gender, age, race/ethnicity, public health degree attainment, role type, current employer, and tenure in public health practice.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A nationally representative sample of governmental public health employees.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>36 752 U.S. governmental public health employees across local and state health agencies representing 47 states.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Self-reported competency gaps.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among nonsupervisors without a formal public health degree, those with a CPH had lower odds of reporting competency gaps in 3 of the 23 skills assessed compared to those without a CPH. Among supervisors/managers without a formal public health degree, those with a CPH had lower odds of reporting competency gaps in 6 of the 24 skills assessed compared to those without a CPH. Among executives without a formal public health degree, those with a CPH had no significant differences in reporting competency gaps in any of the 24 skills assessed compared to those without a CPH. When looking at the public health workforce as a whole, both with and without formal public health degrees, there were few significant competency gap differences between workers with and without the CPH.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Having a CPH is associated with fewer self-reported competency gaps, specifically among the 85% of governmental public health employees without a public health degree. Thus, the CPH may be valuable to the sizable governmental public health workforce that does not have a formal education in public health. The CPH seems to be less impactful for executives compared to other supervisory levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":47855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000002189","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study is to examine competency gaps among governmental public health workers with and without the Certified in Public Health (CPH) credential, specifically among the majority of the workforce without a formal public health degree.

Design: This cross-sectional study uses 2021 Public Health Workforce Interests and Needs Survey (PH WINS) data. Multivariate logistic regressions of reported skill gaps were performed while controlling for gender, age, race/ethnicity, public health degree attainment, role type, current employer, and tenure in public health practice.

Setting: A nationally representative sample of governmental public health employees.

Participants: 36 752 U.S. governmental public health employees across local and state health agencies representing 47 states.

Main outcome measures: Self-reported competency gaps.

Results: Among nonsupervisors without a formal public health degree, those with a CPH had lower odds of reporting competency gaps in 3 of the 23 skills assessed compared to those without a CPH. Among supervisors/managers without a formal public health degree, those with a CPH had lower odds of reporting competency gaps in 6 of the 24 skills assessed compared to those without a CPH. Among executives without a formal public health degree, those with a CPH had no significant differences in reporting competency gaps in any of the 24 skills assessed compared to those without a CPH. When looking at the public health workforce as a whole, both with and without formal public health degrees, there were few significant competency gap differences between workers with and without the CPH.

Conclusions: Having a CPH is associated with fewer self-reported competency gaps, specifically among the 85% of governmental public health employees without a public health degree. Thus, the CPH may be valuable to the sizable governmental public health workforce that does not have a formal education in public health. The CPH seems to be less impactful for executives compared to other supervisory levels.

有和没有公共卫生证书的政府公共卫生雇员的能力差距。
目的:本研究的目的是检查有和没有公共卫生认证(CPH)证书的政府公共卫生工作者之间的能力差距,特别是在大多数没有正式公共卫生学位的劳动力中。设计:本横断面研究使用2021年公共卫生劳动力兴趣和需求调查(PH WINS)数据。在控制性别、年龄、种族/民族、公共卫生学位获得程度、角色类型、当前雇主和公共卫生实践任期的情况下,对报告的技能差距进行多变量logistic回归。背景:政府公共卫生雇员的全国代表性样本。参与者:36 752名来自47个州的地方和州卫生机构的美国政府公共卫生雇员。主要结果测量:自我报告的能力差距。结果:在没有正式公共卫生学位的非主管中,与没有公共卫生学位的人相比,拥有公共卫生学位的人在23项技能评估中的3项技能中报告能力差距的几率更低。在没有正式公共卫生学位的主管/经理中,与没有公共卫生学位的人相比,拥有公共卫生学位的人在24项评估技能中的6项中报告能力差距的几率更低。在没有正式公共卫生学位的高管中,与没有公共卫生学位的高管相比,拥有公共卫生学位的高管在报告24项评估技能中的任何一项能力差距方面都没有显著差异。从整体上看,无论是否拥有正式的公共卫生学位,拥有和没有公共卫生学位的工作者之间几乎没有显著的能力差距差异。结论:拥有CPH与自我报告的能力差距较小有关,特别是在85%没有公共卫生学位的政府公共卫生雇员中。因此,CPH可能对没有接受过正规公共卫生教育的政府公共卫生工作人员很有价值。与其他监管级别相比,CPH对高管的影响似乎较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
287
期刊介绍: Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes articles which focus on evidence based public health practice and research. The journal is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed publication guided by a multidisciplinary editorial board of administrators, practitioners and scientists. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes in a wide range of population health topics including research to practice; emergency preparedness; bioterrorism; infectious disease surveillance; environmental health; community health assessment, chronic disease prevention and health promotion, and academic-practice linkages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信