Sara Lolar, Robert R Ehrman, Anne M Messman, Alexandria Garino
{"title":"Exploring Gender-Based Barriers in Physician Assistant Educator Authorship: Insights From a Physician Assistant Author Survey.","authors":"Sara Lolar, Robert R Ehrman, Anne M Messman, Alexandria Garino","doi":"10.1097/JPA.0000000000000694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Gender disparities in academic publishing hinder career advancement and limit diverse contributions in the physician assistant (PA) profession. Although many female PA educators publish successfully, the barriers they face remain underexplored. This study examined the challenges and facilitators of female authorship to inform strategies that promote equity in scholarly productivity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>First and last PA authors of Journal of Physician Assistant Education (JPAE) research articles (2014-2022) were identified. Identified authors were invited to participate in a survey, which was adapted, piloted among 8 faculty members, and distributed through Qualtrics. Descriptive statistics and inferential tests were applied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 177 unique PA authors, 69% identified as female. The response rate was 47%. Women had a median age of 49 years (IQR 44-60), compared with 55 years (IQR 41-64) for men. More men (40%) held full professor rank than women (20%). Women reported fewer first-author or last-author publications, lower levels of institutional support, and more frequent authorship conflicts (37% vs. 7.7%, P < .001), with 24% of women experiencing repeated disputes.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Despite similar educational backgrounds, men held higher academic ranks and published more frequently. Women reported lower institutional support, which may contribute to disparities in research productivity. Authorship conflicts may further hinder female publication success and affect future collaborations. Addressing biases, improving collaboration, and ensuring equitable institutional support are essential for fostering gender equity in PA faculty advancement.</p>","PeriodicalId":39231,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physician Assistant Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physician Assistant Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPA.0000000000000694","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Gender disparities in academic publishing hinder career advancement and limit diverse contributions in the physician assistant (PA) profession. Although many female PA educators publish successfully, the barriers they face remain underexplored. This study examined the challenges and facilitators of female authorship to inform strategies that promote equity in scholarly productivity.
Methods: First and last PA authors of Journal of Physician Assistant Education (JPAE) research articles (2014-2022) were identified. Identified authors were invited to participate in a survey, which was adapted, piloted among 8 faculty members, and distributed through Qualtrics. Descriptive statistics and inferential tests were applied.
Results: Among 177 unique PA authors, 69% identified as female. The response rate was 47%. Women had a median age of 49 years (IQR 44-60), compared with 55 years (IQR 41-64) for men. More men (40%) held full professor rank than women (20%). Women reported fewer first-author or last-author publications, lower levels of institutional support, and more frequent authorship conflicts (37% vs. 7.7%, P < .001), with 24% of women experiencing repeated disputes.
Discussion: Despite similar educational backgrounds, men held higher academic ranks and published more frequently. Women reported lower institutional support, which may contribute to disparities in research productivity. Authorship conflicts may further hinder female publication success and affect future collaborations. Addressing biases, improving collaboration, and ensuring equitable institutional support are essential for fostering gender equity in PA faculty advancement.
学术出版中的性别差异阻碍了职业发展,并限制了医师助理(PA)职业的多样化贡献。尽管许多女性私人关系教育工作者成功地发表了作品,但她们面临的障碍仍未得到充分探讨。本研究考察了女性作者身份的挑战和促进因素,为促进学术生产力平等的战略提供信息。方法:选取Journal of Physician Assistant Education (JPAE)研究文章(2014-2022)的第一作者和最后作者。确定的作者被邀请参加一项调查,该调查在8名教员中进行了改编和试点,并通过Qualtrics分发。采用描述性统计和推理检验。结果:在177位独特的PA作者中,69%为女性。应答率为47%。女性的中位年龄为49岁(IQR 44-60),而男性为55岁(IQR 41-64)。拥有正教授职位的男性(40%)多于女性(20%)。女性报告第一作者或最后作者发表的文章较少,机构支持水平较低,作者冲突更频繁(37% vs. 7.7%, P < 0.001), 24%的女性经历过反复的争议。讨论:尽管教育背景相似,但男性的学术地位更高,发表的文章也更多。妇女报告的机构支持较低,这可能导致研究生产力的差异。作者冲突可能会进一步阻碍女性出版的成功,并影响未来的合作。消除偏见,改善合作,确保公平的机构支持对于促进个人科学学院教师晋升中的性别平等至关重要。