Losing persons: the pastoral imperative for affirming continued personhood for those living with dementia.

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Global Bioethics Pub Date : 2025-07-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/11287462.2025.2532920
Stephen R Milford
{"title":"Losing persons: the pastoral imperative for affirming continued personhood for those living with dementia.","authors":"Stephen R Milford","doi":"10.1080/11287462.2025.2532920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dementia is responsible for untold suffering, most significant is the fear that someone will lose themselves. This fear raises very serious pastoral questions: Who is the person living with dementia? Are they the same person they have always been or someone new? In either case, how do we treat them? Using the well-known case of Margo and the discussions between Dworkin and Dresser around advanced care directives, this article radically challenges the standard psychology view of personhood as being pastorally unhelpful in dementia cases. We argue that a relational view of personhood is not only epistemologically consistent but better suited to the pastoral challenge presented by dementia than that of the standard psychological view. While dementia represents the loss of cognitive abilities, and in many cases an entire change in personality, it does not represent either the loss of a person nor a change of personhood. Through dementia a person remains a person because they are personally related to by the same community of persons who have always loved them. This normative framework offers those living with dementia, their community, and their carers with a coherent, yet pastorally helpful response to the existential questions raised by dementia.</p>","PeriodicalId":36835,"journal":{"name":"Global Bioethics","volume":"36 1","pages":"2532920"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12281647/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11287462.2025.2532920","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dementia is responsible for untold suffering, most significant is the fear that someone will lose themselves. This fear raises very serious pastoral questions: Who is the person living with dementia? Are they the same person they have always been or someone new? In either case, how do we treat them? Using the well-known case of Margo and the discussions between Dworkin and Dresser around advanced care directives, this article radically challenges the standard psychology view of personhood as being pastorally unhelpful in dementia cases. We argue that a relational view of personhood is not only epistemologically consistent but better suited to the pastoral challenge presented by dementia than that of the standard psychological view. While dementia represents the loss of cognitive abilities, and in many cases an entire change in personality, it does not represent either the loss of a person nor a change of personhood. Through dementia a person remains a person because they are personally related to by the same community of persons who have always loved them. This normative framework offers those living with dementia, their community, and their carers with a coherent, yet pastorally helpful response to the existential questions raised by dementia.

失丧的人:确认失智症患者持续人格的牧灵必要性。
痴呆症会带来难以言表的痛苦,最重要的是担心某人会失去自我。这种恐惧引发了非常严肃的牧师问题:谁是患有痴呆症的人?他们是一直以来的那个人还是另一个人?在这两种情况下,我们如何对待他们?本文以著名的Margo案例为例,以及德沃金和德莱塞围绕高级护理指示的讨论,从根本上挑战了人格在痴呆症病例中没有牧师作用的标准心理学观点。我们认为,人格的关系观不仅在认识论上是一致的,而且比标准的心理学观更适合于痴呆症提出的教牧挑战。虽然痴呆症代表认知能力的丧失,而且在许多情况下是人格的完全改变,但它既不代表一个人的丧失,也不代表人格的改变。尽管患有痴呆症,但一个人仍然是一个人,因为他们与一直爱着他们的同一群人有个人关系。这一规范框架为痴呆症患者、他们的社区和他们的照顾者提供了一个连贯的、有益的牧者回应,以应对痴呆症带来的存在问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Bioethics
Global Bioethics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
37 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信