Study on medical professionals' attitudes and awareness of multidisciplinary rehabilitation in pain syndromes.

Q4 Medicine
Lidiia V Butska, Hanna B Varina, Leonid V Bondar, Olena A Mialovytska
{"title":"Study on medical professionals' attitudes and awareness of multidisciplinary rehabilitation in pain syndromes.","authors":"Lidiia V Butska, Hanna B Varina, Leonid V Bondar, Olena A Mialovytska","doi":"10.36740/WLek/207369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Aim: To assess the awareness and training needs of healthcare professionals regarding the multidisciplinary rehabilitation of patients with pain syndromes and comorbid conditions resulting from war trauma.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Materials and Methods: The structured online survey of 120 people, including doctors, nurses, medical assistants, paramedics and senior students of medical universities in Kyiv and Zaporizhzhya (Ukraine). Before that, a targeted review of international (WHO, NICE, EULAR) and national guidelines on multidisciplinary rehabilitation was conducted. Based on this regulatory framework, the authors developed the «Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation Attitude and Readiness Questionnaire».</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results: Although 89% of respondents were familiar with the concept of multidisciplinary rehabilitation, only 17% demonstrated a comprehensive understanding. Most respondents (54%) reported only partial awareness and emphasized the need to improve teamwork skills and learn modern rehabilitation methods. Psychological support was recognized as essential by 58%, while 42% showed uncertainty or held misconceptions. Core rehabilitation components identified included pharmacological stabilization (65%), interdisciplinary collaboration (50%), and patient education (45%). However, elements such as empathy, active listening (25%), and social reintegration (15%) were undervalued. Only 23% of participants rated their competence in teamwork as sufficient, and nearly half (48%) assessed their preparedness as low. Priority areas for further education included trauma-informed care, psychological first aid, prevention of professional burnout, and the use of non-pharmacological methods such as electrotherapy and acupuncture.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Conclusions: Despite formal awareness of multidisciplinary rehabilitation, significant gaps exist in practical competencies. Expanding interdisciplinary training and emphasizing psychosocial components are critical to improving care for war-affected patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23643,"journal":{"name":"Wiadomosci lekarskie","volume":"78 6","pages":"1083-1090"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiadomosci lekarskie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36740/WLek/207369","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Aim: To assess the awareness and training needs of healthcare professionals regarding the multidisciplinary rehabilitation of patients with pain syndromes and comorbid conditions resulting from war trauma.

Patients and methods: Materials and Methods: The structured online survey of 120 people, including doctors, nurses, medical assistants, paramedics and senior students of medical universities in Kyiv and Zaporizhzhya (Ukraine). Before that, a targeted review of international (WHO, NICE, EULAR) and national guidelines on multidisciplinary rehabilitation was conducted. Based on this regulatory framework, the authors developed the «Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation Attitude and Readiness Questionnaire».

Results: Results: Although 89% of respondents were familiar with the concept of multidisciplinary rehabilitation, only 17% demonstrated a comprehensive understanding. Most respondents (54%) reported only partial awareness and emphasized the need to improve teamwork skills and learn modern rehabilitation methods. Psychological support was recognized as essential by 58%, while 42% showed uncertainty or held misconceptions. Core rehabilitation components identified included pharmacological stabilization (65%), interdisciplinary collaboration (50%), and patient education (45%). However, elements such as empathy, active listening (25%), and social reintegration (15%) were undervalued. Only 23% of participants rated their competence in teamwork as sufficient, and nearly half (48%) assessed their preparedness as low. Priority areas for further education included trauma-informed care, psychological first aid, prevention of professional burnout, and the use of non-pharmacological methods such as electrotherapy and acupuncture.

Conclusion: Conclusions: Despite formal awareness of multidisciplinary rehabilitation, significant gaps exist in practical competencies. Expanding interdisciplinary training and emphasizing psychosocial components are critical to improving care for war-affected patients.

医学专业人员对疼痛综合征多学科康复的态度和认知研究。
目的:评估医疗保健专业人员对战争创伤后疼痛综合征和合并症患者多学科康复的认识和培训需求。患者和方法:材料和方法:对120人进行结构化在线调查,包括基辅和扎波罗热亚医科大学的医生、护士、医疗助理、护理人员和高年级学生。在此之前,对国际(世卫组织、NICE、EULAR)和国家多学科康复指南进行了有针对性的审查。基于这一监管框架,作者开发了“多学科康复态度和准备问卷”。结果:虽然89%的受访者熟悉多学科康复的概念,但只有17%的受访者表现出全面的理解。大多数受访者(54%)表示只有部分意识,并强调需要提高团队合作技能和学习现代康复方法。58%的人认为心理支持是必不可少的,而42%的人表示不确定或持有误解。确定的核心康复成分包括药理学稳定(65%)、跨学科合作(50%)和患者教育(45%)。然而,同理心、积极倾听(25%)和重新融入社会(15%)等因素被低估了。只有23%的参与者认为他们的团队合作能力是足够的,近一半(48%)的人认为他们的准备不足。继续教育的优先领域包括了解创伤的护理、心理急救、职业倦怠的预防以及电疗和针灸等非药物方法的使用。结论:尽管对多学科康复有正式的认识,但在实践能力方面存在显著差距。扩大跨学科培训和强调心理社会因素对于改善对受战争影响患者的护理至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wiadomosci lekarskie
Wiadomosci lekarskie Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
482
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信