Rehabilitation for degenerative cervical myelopathy: systematic review and scoping review of UK patient information

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Toby O. Smith, Christopher Newton, Ayshea Farrell, Jithy Boby, Jonathan Dove, Fiona Dove, Kelly Turner, Benjamin M. Davies
{"title":"Rehabilitation for degenerative cervical myelopathy: systematic review and scoping review of UK patient information","authors":"Toby O. Smith, Christopher Newton, Ayshea Farrell, Jithy Boby, Jonathan Dove, Fiona Dove, Kelly Turner, Benjamin M. Davies","doi":"10.1038/s41393-025-01110-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Systematic Literature Review & Patient-Information Scoping Review To assess the evidence on prehabilitation and post-operative rehabilitation interventions for people undergoing surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) and to determine what publicly accessible information is provided to patients from the NHS surrounding DCM surgery. A systematic literature review was searched from inception to 19 May 2025. Studies reporting pain, function, disability or quality of life for prehabilitation or post-operative rehabilitation interventions for people undergoing DCM surgery were eligible. Downs and Black appraisal tool was used to assess study quality. Data were analysed in a narrative analysis. Secondary, a review of UK NHS Patient Information Documents (PID) was searched using a Google platform assessment. PID reporting prehabilitation or post-operative information for people awaiting DCM surgery were included. The type of information being provided were extracted and descriptive statistics were used to report frequency of information provision. From 5218 screened studies, six studies (n = 685) met the eligibility criteria. The evidence was low to moderate in quality. Rehabilitation offered demonstrated improved clinical outcomes but there was limited evidence compared to non-rehabilitation or superiority between different rehabilitation strategies. The PID review identified 38 documents. This indicates education and guidance is commonly offered on returning to work (68%), driving (76%) and normal activities of daily living (63%). There remains uncertainty on what should be and is offered to patients with DCM in respect to prehabilitation or post-operative rehabilitation. Robust clinical trial evidence on rehabilitation approaches for this population is needed. PROSPERO (CRD42024604184).","PeriodicalId":21976,"journal":{"name":"Spinal cord","volume":"63 9","pages":"482-491"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12413311/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spinal cord","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41393-025-01110-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Systematic Literature Review & Patient-Information Scoping Review To assess the evidence on prehabilitation and post-operative rehabilitation interventions for people undergoing surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) and to determine what publicly accessible information is provided to patients from the NHS surrounding DCM surgery. A systematic literature review was searched from inception to 19 May 2025. Studies reporting pain, function, disability or quality of life for prehabilitation or post-operative rehabilitation interventions for people undergoing DCM surgery were eligible. Downs and Black appraisal tool was used to assess study quality. Data were analysed in a narrative analysis. Secondary, a review of UK NHS Patient Information Documents (PID) was searched using a Google platform assessment. PID reporting prehabilitation or post-operative information for people awaiting DCM surgery were included. The type of information being provided were extracted and descriptive statistics were used to report frequency of information provision. From 5218 screened studies, six studies (n = 685) met the eligibility criteria. The evidence was low to moderate in quality. Rehabilitation offered demonstrated improved clinical outcomes but there was limited evidence compared to non-rehabilitation or superiority between different rehabilitation strategies. The PID review identified 38 documents. This indicates education and guidance is commonly offered on returning to work (68%), driving (76%) and normal activities of daily living (63%). There remains uncertainty on what should be and is offered to patients with DCM in respect to prehabilitation or post-operative rehabilitation. Robust clinical trial evidence on rehabilitation approaches for this population is needed. PROSPERO (CRD42024604184).

Abstract Image

退行性脊髓型颈椎病的康复:英国患者信息的系统评价和范围评价。
研究设计:系统文献综述和患者信息范围综述目的:评估退行性颈椎病(DCM)患者手术前康复和术后康复干预的证据,并确定NHS为DCM手术患者提供了哪些可公开获取的信息。方法:检索自成立至2025年5月19日的系统文献。报告DCM手术患者在康复前或术后康复干预中疼痛、功能、残疾或生活质量的研究符合条件。采用Downs和Black评价工具评价研究质量。数据以叙事分析的方式进行分析。其次,使用谷歌平台评估检索英国NHS患者信息文档(PID)。PID报告了等待DCM手术的患者的康复或术后信息。提取所提供信息的类型,并使用描述性统计来报告提供信息的频率。结果:5218项筛选研究中,6项研究(n = 685)符合入选标准。证据的质量为低到中等。康复治疗可改善临床结果,但与非康复治疗或不同康复治疗策略之间的优势相比,证据有限。PID审查确定了38个文件。这表明,在重返工作岗位(68%)、驾驶(76%)和正常日常生活活动(63%)方面,通常会提供教育和指导。结论:对于DCM患者在术前和术后康复方面应该做什么和提供什么仍然存在不确定性。需要针对这一人群的康复方法的强有力的临床试验证据。注册:普洛斯彼罗(CRD42024604184)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spinal cord
Spinal cord 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
142
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Spinal Cord is a specialised, international journal that has been publishing spinal cord related manuscripts since 1963. It appears monthly, online and in print, and accepts contributions on spinal cord anatomy, physiology, management of injury and disease, and the quality of life and life circumstances of people with a spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord is multi-disciplinary and publishes contributions across the entire spectrum of research ranging from basic science to applied clinical research. It focuses on high quality original research, systematic reviews and narrative reviews. Spinal Cord''s sister journal Spinal Cord Series and Cases: Clinical Management in Spinal Cord Disorders publishes high quality case reports, small case series, pilot and retrospective studies perspectives, Pulse survey articles, Point-couterpoint articles, correspondences and book reviews. It specialises in material that addresses all aspects of life for persons with spinal cord injuries or disorders. For more information, please see the aims and scope of Spinal Cord Series and Cases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信