Yield of Exome Sequencing for Mendelian Disorders Screening in Asymptomatic Fetuses Undergoing Prenatal Diagnosis: A Retrospective Analysis of 1766 Cases.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Prenatal Diagnosis Pub Date : 2025-07-22 DOI:10.1002/pd.6853
Guan Wang, Ting Xue, Tian Xie, Min Liang, Longsheng Zhan, Junwei Lin, Xiumin Huang, Jinxin Luo, Qi Tian, Jun Zhang
{"title":"Yield of Exome Sequencing for Mendelian Disorders Screening in Asymptomatic Fetuses Undergoing Prenatal Diagnosis: A Retrospective Analysis of 1766 Cases.","authors":"Guan Wang, Ting Xue, Tian Xie, Min Liang, Longsheng Zhan, Junwei Lin, Xiumin Huang, Jinxin Luo, Qi Tian, Jun Zhang","doi":"10.1002/pd.6853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to evaluate the yield of exome sequencing (ES) as a routine screening test for Mendelian disorders in asymptomatic fetuses undergoing prenatal diagnosis, with a focus on identifying gene variants associated with moderate to severe diseases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 2593 fetuses underwent prenatal ES (pES) testing at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University between 2021 and 2022. Out of these, we excluded 827 pES datasets from fetuses with abnormal ultrasound findings, as well as those with a confirmed/suspected family history of Mendelian disorders. Consequently, a cohort of 1766 singleton ES datasets from asymptomatic fetuses was included in this study and subsequently subjected to retrospective analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 25 cases with 30 variants in 23 genes that may present with moderate to severe diseases, giving a yield of 1.42% (25/1766). Among these genes, 73.91% were associated with autosomal dominant (AD) inheritance, 21.74% with autosomal recessive (AR) inheritance, and 4.35% with X-linked recessive (XLR) inheritance. Of the 30 identified variants, 23.33% were classified as pathogenic, 73.33% as likely pathogenic, and 3.33% as variants of uncertain significance. The types of variants included missense (23.33%), nonsense (33.33%), frameshift deletion (26.67%), splicing region (13.33%), and inframe deletion (3.33%). Clinically, 40% (10/25) of the cases were at risk of severe diseases, and 60% (15/25) of the cases were at risk of moderate diseases. Of the positive cases, 92% (23/25) were liveborn, and 73.91% (17/23) were effectively followed up to the age of three. Among these 17 cases, two exhibited clinical presentations that highly met the criteria for ES findings, while two exhibited clinical presentations that partially met the criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this study suggest that application of ES as a routine test in asymptomatic fetuses undergoing prenatal diagnosis could enhance the detection of Mendelian disorders, thereby providing information to parents about the health of their fetus, providing them with reproductive options, as well as providing the potential for medical interventions prenatally or postnatally. However, challenges may arise in variant interpretation in the absence of phenotype, along with the risk of uncertain outcomes for positive cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":20387,"journal":{"name":"Prenatal Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prenatal Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.6853","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to evaluate the yield of exome sequencing (ES) as a routine screening test for Mendelian disorders in asymptomatic fetuses undergoing prenatal diagnosis, with a focus on identifying gene variants associated with moderate to severe diseases.

Methods: A total of 2593 fetuses underwent prenatal ES (pES) testing at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University between 2021 and 2022. Out of these, we excluded 827 pES datasets from fetuses with abnormal ultrasound findings, as well as those with a confirmed/suspected family history of Mendelian disorders. Consequently, a cohort of 1766 singleton ES datasets from asymptomatic fetuses was included in this study and subsequently subjected to retrospective analysis.

Results: We identified 25 cases with 30 variants in 23 genes that may present with moderate to severe diseases, giving a yield of 1.42% (25/1766). Among these genes, 73.91% were associated with autosomal dominant (AD) inheritance, 21.74% with autosomal recessive (AR) inheritance, and 4.35% with X-linked recessive (XLR) inheritance. Of the 30 identified variants, 23.33% were classified as pathogenic, 73.33% as likely pathogenic, and 3.33% as variants of uncertain significance. The types of variants included missense (23.33%), nonsense (33.33%), frameshift deletion (26.67%), splicing region (13.33%), and inframe deletion (3.33%). Clinically, 40% (10/25) of the cases were at risk of severe diseases, and 60% (15/25) of the cases were at risk of moderate diseases. Of the positive cases, 92% (23/25) were liveborn, and 73.91% (17/23) were effectively followed up to the age of three. Among these 17 cases, two exhibited clinical presentations that highly met the criteria for ES findings, while two exhibited clinical presentations that partially met the criteria.

Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest that application of ES as a routine test in asymptomatic fetuses undergoing prenatal diagnosis could enhance the detection of Mendelian disorders, thereby providing information to parents about the health of their fetus, providing them with reproductive options, as well as providing the potential for medical interventions prenatally or postnatally. However, challenges may arise in variant interpretation in the absence of phenotype, along with the risk of uncertain outcomes for positive cases.

产前诊断无症状胎儿孟德尔疾病筛查的外显子组测序结果:1766例回顾性分析
目的:我们旨在评估外显子组测序(ES)作为无症状胎儿进行产前诊断孟德尔疾病的常规筛查试验的产量,重点是识别与中度至重度疾病相关的基因变异。方法:2021 - 2022年中山大学第三附属医院共2593例胎儿进行了产前ES (pES)检测。其中,我们排除了827个pe数据集,这些数据集来自超声检查结果异常的胎儿,以及证实或怀疑有孟德尔疾病家族史的胎儿。因此,本研究纳入了1766例来自无症状胎儿的单胎ES数据集,并随后进行了回顾性分析。结果:我们确定了25例23个基因的30个变异,可能表现为中度至重度疾病,产率为1.42%(25/1766)。其中,73.91%与常染色体显性遗传(AD)相关,21.74%与常染色体隐性遗传(AR)相关,4.35%与x连锁隐性遗传(XLR)相关。在已鉴定的30个变异中,23.33%归为致病性,73.33%归为可能致病性,3.33%归为意义不确定的变异。变异类型包括错义(23.33%)、无义(33.33%)、移码缺失(26.67%)、剪接区(13.33%)和帧内缺失(3.33%)。临床上,40%(10/25)的病例有严重疾病危险,60%(15/25)的病例有中度疾病危险。阳性病例中,92%(23/25)为活产儿,73.91%(17/23)有效随访至3岁。在这17例中,2例临床表现高度符合ES的诊断标准,2例临床表现部分符合ES的诊断标准。结论:本研究结果表明,在无症状胎儿进行产前诊断时,将ES作为常规检查可以提高孟德尔障碍的检测,从而为父母提供胎儿健康信息,为他们提供生殖选择,并为产前或产后的医疗干预提供可能。然而,在没有表型的情况下,变异解释可能会出现挑战,同时阳性病例的结果也存在不确定的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prenatal Diagnosis
Prenatal Diagnosis 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
204
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Prenatal Diagnosis welcomes submissions in all aspects of prenatal diagnosis with a particular focus on areas in which molecular biology and genetics interface with prenatal care and therapy, encompassing: all aspects of fetal imaging, including sonography and magnetic resonance imaging; prenatal cytogenetics, including molecular studies and array CGH; prenatal screening studies; fetal cells and cell-free nucleic acids in maternal blood and other fluids; preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD); prenatal diagnosis of single gene disorders, including metabolic disorders; fetal therapy; fetal and placental development and pathology; development and evaluation of laboratory services for prenatal diagnosis; psychosocial, legal, ethical and economic aspects of prenatal diagnosis; prenatal genetic counseling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信