Central vs. Peripheral Venous Oxaliplatin Administration and Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Severity.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Tingting Yang, Yuting Fang, Lixia Chang, Guifu Wu, Teng Li, Yongkun Sun
{"title":"Central vs. Peripheral Venous Oxaliplatin Administration and Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Severity.","authors":"Tingting Yang, Yuting Fang, Lixia Chang, Guifu Wu, Teng Li, Yongkun Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2025.06.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine whether central-venous (CV) administration of oxaliplatin is associated with less severe chemotherapyinduced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) than peripheral-venous (PV) administration, using the Comprehensive Assessment Scale for Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CAS-CIPN).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective, observational cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective observational cohort study involved patients receiving oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy from the Cancer Hospital of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College between February 1, 2023, and March 30, 2024. Participants were categorized into CV or PV groups based on infusion route. The primary outcome was the overall CAS-CIPN score, assessed using a questionnaire adapted from the Japanese version of the Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Assessment Scale. Statistical analyses included univariate tests (Mann-Whitney U test) and multivariate logistic regression(adjusting for age, gender, number of chemotherapy cycles, and cancer types),and subgroup evaluations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 260 eligible patients were included in this study, with 200 receiving PV infusion and 60 receiving CV infusion. Univariate analysis showed significantly lower overall CAS-CIPN scores in the CV group compared to the PV group (p = 0.005). Significant differences in specific symptom scores (S1, S3, S5, S6, S9) were observed, favoring the CV group. Multivariate analysis identified CV administration as a protective factor against CIPN (OR = 0.23, 95% CI: 0.09-0.58, p = 0.024). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that CV administration significantly reduced neurotoxicity in middle-aged patients (OR = 0.00, 95% CI: 0.00 -0.36, p = 0.005), those receiving only one chemotherapy cycle (OR = 0.01, 95% CI: 0.00 - 0.73, p = 0.03), and patients with hepatobiliary and pancreatic cancers. (OR = 0.00, 95% CI: 0.00 - 0.16, p = 0.015) CONCLUSION: CV administration of oxaliplatin is associated with reduced neurotoxicity compared to peripheral venous infusion, particularly benefiting middle-aged patients, those receiving single-cycle therapy, and hepatobiliary and pancreatic cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Clinical: </strong>Implications Adopting CV access for oxaliplatin administration could be a simple, low-cost strategy to mitigate CIPN, particularly in middle-aged patients, single-cycle regimens, and hepatobiliary or pancreatic cancer populations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CV administration of OXL is associated with reduced neurotoxicity compared to PV infusion, particularly benefiting middle-aged patients, those receiving single-cycle therapy, and hepatobiliary and pancreatic cancer patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Management Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2025.06.011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To determine whether central-venous (CV) administration of oxaliplatin is associated with less severe chemotherapyinduced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) than peripheral-venous (PV) administration, using the Comprehensive Assessment Scale for Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CAS-CIPN).

Design: Prospective, observational cohort study.

Methods: This prospective observational cohort study involved patients receiving oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy from the Cancer Hospital of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College between February 1, 2023, and March 30, 2024. Participants were categorized into CV or PV groups based on infusion route. The primary outcome was the overall CAS-CIPN score, assessed using a questionnaire adapted from the Japanese version of the Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Assessment Scale. Statistical analyses included univariate tests (Mann-Whitney U test) and multivariate logistic regression(adjusting for age, gender, number of chemotherapy cycles, and cancer types),and subgroup evaluations.

Results: A total of 260 eligible patients were included in this study, with 200 receiving PV infusion and 60 receiving CV infusion. Univariate analysis showed significantly lower overall CAS-CIPN scores in the CV group compared to the PV group (p = 0.005). Significant differences in specific symptom scores (S1, S3, S5, S6, S9) were observed, favoring the CV group. Multivariate analysis identified CV administration as a protective factor against CIPN (OR = 0.23, 95% CI: 0.09-0.58, p = 0.024). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that CV administration significantly reduced neurotoxicity in middle-aged patients (OR = 0.00, 95% CI: 0.00 -0.36, p = 0.005), those receiving only one chemotherapy cycle (OR = 0.01, 95% CI: 0.00 - 0.73, p = 0.03), and patients with hepatobiliary and pancreatic cancers. (OR = 0.00, 95% CI: 0.00 - 0.16, p = 0.015) CONCLUSION: CV administration of oxaliplatin is associated with reduced neurotoxicity compared to peripheral venous infusion, particularly benefiting middle-aged patients, those receiving single-cycle therapy, and hepatobiliary and pancreatic cancer patients.

Clinical: Implications Adopting CV access for oxaliplatin administration could be a simple, low-cost strategy to mitigate CIPN, particularly in middle-aged patients, single-cycle regimens, and hepatobiliary or pancreatic cancer populations.

Conclusion: CV administration of OXL is associated with reduced neurotoxicity compared to PV infusion, particularly benefiting middle-aged patients, those receiving single-cycle therapy, and hepatobiliary and pancreatic cancer patients.

中枢静脉与外周静脉奥沙利铂给药与化疗诱导的周围神经病变严重程度。
目的:利用化疗诱导周围神经病变综合评估量表(CAS-CIPN),确定奥沙利铂中心静脉(CV)给药与外周静脉(PV)给药相比,是否与化疗诱导周围神经病变(CIPN)的严重程度较低相关。设计:前瞻性、观察性队列研究。方法:这项前瞻性观察队列研究纳入了2023年2月1日至2024年3月30日期间在中国医学科学院肿瘤医院和北京协和医学院接受奥沙利铂类化疗的患者。根据输注途径将参与者分为CV组或PV组。主要结果是CAS-CIPN总评分,使用一份改编自日本版化疗诱导周围神经病变评估量表的问卷进行评估。统计分析包括单变量检验(Mann-Whitney U检验)、多变量logistic回归(调整年龄、性别、化疗周期数和癌症类型)和亚组评估。结果:本研究共纳入260例符合条件的患者,其中200例接受PV输注,60例接受CV输注。单因素分析显示,与PV组相比,CV组的CAS-CIPN总分显著降低(p = 0.005)。在特定症状评分(S1、S3、S5、S6、S9)上观察到显著差异,CV组更有利。多因素分析发现CV管理是预防CIPN的保护因素(OR = 0.23,95% CI: 0.09-0.58, p = 0.024)。亚组分析表明,在中年患者(OR = 0.00,95% CI: 0.00 -0.36, p = 0.005)、仅接受一个化疗周期的患者(OR = 0.01,95% CI: 0.00 - 0.73, p = 0.03)和肝胆癌和胰腺癌患者中,给予CV可显著降低神经毒性。(OR = 0.00,95% CI: 0.00 - 0.16, p = 0.015)结论:与外周静脉输注相比,CV给药奥沙利铂可降低神经毒性,尤其有利于中年患者、接受单周期治疗的患者以及肝胆癌和胰腺癌患者。临床:意义采用CV通路给药奥沙利铂可能是一种简单,低成本的策略,以减轻CIPN,特别是在中年患者,单周期方案,肝胆或胰腺癌人群。结论:与PV输注相比,CV给药OXL可降低神经毒性,尤其有利于中年患者、接受单周期治疗的患者以及肝胆和胰腺癌患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Management Nursing
Pain Management Nursing 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
187
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This peer-reviewed journal offers a unique focus on the realm of pain management as it applies to nursing. Original and review articles from experts in the field offer key insights in the areas of clinical practice, advocacy, education, administration, and research. Additional features include practice guidelines and pharmacology updates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信