Intradyadic analysis of child parent perceptions of penile appearance post-hypospadias repair using the Paediatric Penile Perception Score (PPPS) in a middle-income country setting.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Anand Sanmugam, Tharisinidevi Kunasekaran, Wei Sheng Tan, Srihari Singaravel, Yew-Wei Tan, Shireen Anne Nah
{"title":"Intradyadic analysis of child parent perceptions of penile appearance post-hypospadias repair using the Paediatric Penile Perception Score (PPPS) in a middle-income country setting.","authors":"Anand Sanmugam, Tharisinidevi Kunasekaran, Wei Sheng Tan, Srihari Singaravel, Yew-Wei Tan, Shireen Anne Nah","doi":"10.1007/s00383-025-06133-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Hypospadias affects roughly 1 in 125 live male births, yet subjective outcome assessment is infrequent. We compared child- and parent-reported cosmetic satisfaction after repair and quantified inter-rater agreement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, all boys aged 7-15 years who attended follow-up at Hospital Sultanah Bahiyah, Malaysia (repairs 2017-2019), were invited. Each child-parent dyad independently completed the Paediatric Penile Perception Score (PPPS; four domains, 1 = very dissatisfied to 4 = very satisfied). Paired Wilcoxon tests examined child-parent differences. Concordance was analysed with Spearman's ρ and quadratic-weighted Cohen's κ.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-three dyads participated (median child age 10.6 years). Median satisfaction for every domain was 3 [IQR 2-3] in both cohorts. Children rated penile-skin appearance one Likert step lower than parents (median difference - 1; p = 0.033); no other paired differences reached significance. Correlations between raters were moderate (ρ = 0.49-0.61). Agreement was fair for penile skin (κ = 0.27) and moderate for meatus position (κ = 0.56, 95% CI 0.29-0.77), glans shape (κ = 0.43) and overall appearance (κ = 0.45).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High overall satisfaction was reported despite surgical delays. Only moderate concordance emerged, with children less pleased with penile skin than their parents. Pre-operative counselling and longitudinal follow-up should explicitly address child-centred aesthetic concerns to enhance psychosocial well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":19832,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Surgery International","volume":"41 1","pages":"223"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12283461/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Surgery International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-025-06133-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Hypospadias affects roughly 1 in 125 live male births, yet subjective outcome assessment is infrequent. We compared child- and parent-reported cosmetic satisfaction after repair and quantified inter-rater agreement.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, all boys aged 7-15 years who attended follow-up at Hospital Sultanah Bahiyah, Malaysia (repairs 2017-2019), were invited. Each child-parent dyad independently completed the Paediatric Penile Perception Score (PPPS; four domains, 1 = very dissatisfied to 4 = very satisfied). Paired Wilcoxon tests examined child-parent differences. Concordance was analysed with Spearman's ρ and quadratic-weighted Cohen's κ.

Results: Sixty-three dyads participated (median child age 10.6 years). Median satisfaction for every domain was 3 [IQR 2-3] in both cohorts. Children rated penile-skin appearance one Likert step lower than parents (median difference - 1; p = 0.033); no other paired differences reached significance. Correlations between raters were moderate (ρ = 0.49-0.61). Agreement was fair for penile skin (κ = 0.27) and moderate for meatus position (κ = 0.56, 95% CI 0.29-0.77), glans shape (κ = 0.43) and overall appearance (κ = 0.45).

Conclusion: High overall satisfaction was reported despite surgical delays. Only moderate concordance emerged, with children less pleased with penile skin than their parents. Pre-operative counselling and longitudinal follow-up should explicitly address child-centred aesthetic concerns to enhance psychosocial well-being.

在中等收入国家,使用儿科阴茎感知评分(PPPS)对尿道下裂修复后儿童父母对阴茎外观的感知进行了阴道内分析。
目的:尿道下裂影响大约1 / 125的活产男婴,但主观结果评估很少。我们比较了儿童和家长报告的修复后美容满意度,并量化了评分者之间的一致性。方法:在这项横断面研究中,邀请所有在马来西亚Sultanah Bahiyah医院(2017-2019年修复)接受随访的7-15岁男孩。每个孩子-父母对独立完成儿科阴茎知觉评分(PPPS;四个领域,1 =非常不满意到4 =非常满意)。配对Wilcoxon测试检验了亲子之间的差异。用Spearman's ρ和二次加权Cohen's κ分析一致性。结果:63对参与者(儿童年龄中位数10.6岁)。在两个队列中,每个领域的满意度中位数为3 [IQR 2-3]。儿童对阴茎皮肤外观的评价比父母低1李克特级(中位数差- 1;p = 0.033);其他配对差异均无显著性。评分者之间的相关性为中等(ρ = 0.49-0.61)。阴茎皮肤(κ = 0.27)的一致性一般,而阴茎道位置(κ = 0.56, 95% CI 0.29-0.77)、龟头形状(κ = 0.43)和整体外观(κ = 0.45)的一致性中等。结论:尽管手术延误,但总体满意度较高。只有适度的一致性出现,孩子们比他们的父母更不喜欢阴茎皮肤。术前咨询和纵向随访应明确解决以儿童为中心的审美问题,以提高社会心理健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
215
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Surgery International is a journal devoted to the publication of new and important information from the entire spectrum of pediatric surgery. The major purpose of the journal is to promote postgraduate training and further education in the surgery of infants and children. The contents will include articles in clinical and experimental surgery, as well as related fields. One section of each issue is devoted to a special topic, with invited contributions from recognized authorities. Other sections will include: -Review articles- Original articles- Technical innovations- Letters to the editor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信