Munisa Hashimi, Hasnat A Amin, Alexander C Day, Fotios Drenos
{"title":"Exploring the causal relationship between vitamin D levels and deficiency with the risk of cataract: A Mendelian Randomisation study.","authors":"Munisa Hashimi, Hasnat A Amin, Alexander C Day, Fotios Drenos","doi":"10.1159/000545332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous observational studies have suggested an association between vitamin D levels and the risk of cataracts. Whilst this correlation has been well reported, there is a lack of causal evidence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We first conducted an observational study using UK Biobank (UKBB) data to explore the correlation between vitamin D levels and deficiency with incident cataract. To assess causality, we then performed both one-sample and two-sample Mendelian Randomisation (MR) analyses. The one-sample MR used genetic risk scores (GRS) reflecting a genetic predisposition to higher vitamin D levels and vitamin D deficiency, examining its association with incident cataract. The two-sample MR, publicly available summary statistics for vitamin D levels and deficiency were used to investigate their relationship with cataract. Sensitivity analyses using a UKBB meta-analysis for vitamin D in a two-sample MR and a gene-focused analysis using variants in genes with a known role in vitamin D metabolism.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The observational analysis showed a statistically significant relationship between both vitamin D levels (OR = 0.998, ln(OR)SE = 3.23x10-4, p = 6.72x10-14) and deficiency (OR = 1.237, ln(OR)SE = 0.022, p = 9.05x10-23) with incident cataract risk. However, there was insufficient evidence to suggest an association between vitamin D supplementation and cataract risk (OR = 0.971, ln(OR)SE = 0.016, p = 0.057). Furthermore, no evidence was found in our one-sample MR analysis to suggest a causal relationship between vitamin D levels (OR = 1.001, ln(OR)SE = 0.002, p = 0.541) or vitamin D deficiency (OR = 1.095, ln(OR)SE = 0.145, p = 0.534) and incident cataract. The inverse variance weighted two-sample MR analysis also showed no evidence to suggest a causal association between vitamin D levels (IVW: OR = 1.122, 95% CI: 0.968-1.301, p = 0.125) or deficiency (IVW: OR= 0.987, 95% CI: 0.959-1.015, p = 0.344) and cataract risk, with consistent results observed using a multi-ethnic cataract cohort. Some evidence was observed between vitamin D levels and increasing cataract risk (Weighted median OR = 1.076, 95% CI: 1.002-1.156, p = 0.045), however, due to sample overlap between the exposure and outcome, datasets should be interpreted with caution.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Whilst we identified a correlative association between vitamin D levels and cataract, we found no robust evidence to support a causal relationship between vitamin D levels and deficiency with cataract risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":19662,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545332","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Previous observational studies have suggested an association between vitamin D levels and the risk of cataracts. Whilst this correlation has been well reported, there is a lack of causal evidence.
Methods: We first conducted an observational study using UK Biobank (UKBB) data to explore the correlation between vitamin D levels and deficiency with incident cataract. To assess causality, we then performed both one-sample and two-sample Mendelian Randomisation (MR) analyses. The one-sample MR used genetic risk scores (GRS) reflecting a genetic predisposition to higher vitamin D levels and vitamin D deficiency, examining its association with incident cataract. The two-sample MR, publicly available summary statistics for vitamin D levels and deficiency were used to investigate their relationship with cataract. Sensitivity analyses using a UKBB meta-analysis for vitamin D in a two-sample MR and a gene-focused analysis using variants in genes with a known role in vitamin D metabolism.
Results: The observational analysis showed a statistically significant relationship between both vitamin D levels (OR = 0.998, ln(OR)SE = 3.23x10-4, p = 6.72x10-14) and deficiency (OR = 1.237, ln(OR)SE = 0.022, p = 9.05x10-23) with incident cataract risk. However, there was insufficient evidence to suggest an association between vitamin D supplementation and cataract risk (OR = 0.971, ln(OR)SE = 0.016, p = 0.057). Furthermore, no evidence was found in our one-sample MR analysis to suggest a causal relationship between vitamin D levels (OR = 1.001, ln(OR)SE = 0.002, p = 0.541) or vitamin D deficiency (OR = 1.095, ln(OR)SE = 0.145, p = 0.534) and incident cataract. The inverse variance weighted two-sample MR analysis also showed no evidence to suggest a causal association between vitamin D levels (IVW: OR = 1.122, 95% CI: 0.968-1.301, p = 0.125) or deficiency (IVW: OR= 0.987, 95% CI: 0.959-1.015, p = 0.344) and cataract risk, with consistent results observed using a multi-ethnic cataract cohort. Some evidence was observed between vitamin D levels and increasing cataract risk (Weighted median OR = 1.076, 95% CI: 1.002-1.156, p = 0.045), however, due to sample overlap between the exposure and outcome, datasets should be interpreted with caution.
Conclusion: Whilst we identified a correlative association between vitamin D levels and cataract, we found no robust evidence to support a causal relationship between vitamin D levels and deficiency with cataract risk.
期刊介绍:
''Ophthalmic Research'' features original papers and reviews reporting on translational and clinical studies. Authors from throughout the world cover research topics on every field in connection with physical, physiologic, pharmacological, biochemical and molecular biological aspects of ophthalmology. This journal also aims to provide a record of international clinical research for both researchers and clinicians in ophthalmology. Finally, the transfer of information from fundamental research to clinical research and clinical practice is particularly welcome.