Short- and long-term impact of aseptic bathing strategies on the skin microbiome in ICU patients.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Tilman E Klassert, Cristina Zubiria-Barrera, Luisa A Denkel, Mercedes Lopez, Robert Neubert, Amelya Keles Slevogt, Frank Bloos, P Christian Schulze, Jörg Epstude, Petra Gastmeier, Christine Geffers, Hortense Slevogt
{"title":"Short- and long-term impact of aseptic bathing strategies on the skin microbiome in ICU patients.","authors":"Tilman E Klassert, Cristina Zubiria-Barrera, Luisa A Denkel, Mercedes Lopez, Robert Neubert, Amelya Keles Slevogt, Frank Bloos, P Christian Schulze, Jörg Epstude, Petra Gastmeier, Christine Geffers, Hortense Slevogt","doi":"10.1007/s00430-025-00843-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bathing strategies with antiseptic agents, such as Chlorhexidine and Octenidine, have been widely adopted to mitigate infection risks in intensive care units (ICU). However, concerns exist regarding their long-term effects on skin microbiome structures and potential unintended consequences, including antibiotic cross-resistance. This longitudinal study characterized the compositional changes of the skin microbiome of ICU patients upon these two antiseptic bathing strategies when compared to standard water and soap bathing. Samples were collected in a three-armed cluster randomized decolonization trial (registration number DRKS00010475). Skin swabs from 5 different sites and three time points were analyzed by culture-based methods, 16S rRNA-gene amplicon sequencing and multiplex Taq-Man assays for detection of antimicrobial resistance genes (ARG). Our results show that Chlorhexidine bathing led to a sustained reduction of the bacterial biomass on different skin sites, as measured by both molecular and culture-based methods. Thereby, the microbial structures remained largely unaltered both in their diversity and their taxonomic composition. However, the loss of microbiome site-specificity observed on the skin of ICU patients remained unchanged independently from the bathing strategy applied and persisted even after discharge. None of the antiseptic bathing strategies led to an increase or accumulation of antibiotic-resistance determinants on any of the skin sites investigated in this study. Thus, this study suggests that daily patient bathing with 2% Chlorhexidine impregnated cloths or 0.08% Octenidine wash mitts does not impact skin microbiome structures and antibiotic resistance gene accumulation in ICU patients when compared to non-antiseptic water and soap bathing routine.</p>","PeriodicalId":18369,"journal":{"name":"Medical Microbiology and Immunology","volume":"214 1","pages":"34"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12283771/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Microbiology and Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00430-025-00843-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bathing strategies with antiseptic agents, such as Chlorhexidine and Octenidine, have been widely adopted to mitigate infection risks in intensive care units (ICU). However, concerns exist regarding their long-term effects on skin microbiome structures and potential unintended consequences, including antibiotic cross-resistance. This longitudinal study characterized the compositional changes of the skin microbiome of ICU patients upon these two antiseptic bathing strategies when compared to standard water and soap bathing. Samples were collected in a three-armed cluster randomized decolonization trial (registration number DRKS00010475). Skin swabs from 5 different sites and three time points were analyzed by culture-based methods, 16S rRNA-gene amplicon sequencing and multiplex Taq-Man assays for detection of antimicrobial resistance genes (ARG). Our results show that Chlorhexidine bathing led to a sustained reduction of the bacterial biomass on different skin sites, as measured by both molecular and culture-based methods. Thereby, the microbial structures remained largely unaltered both in their diversity and their taxonomic composition. However, the loss of microbiome site-specificity observed on the skin of ICU patients remained unchanged independently from the bathing strategy applied and persisted even after discharge. None of the antiseptic bathing strategies led to an increase or accumulation of antibiotic-resistance determinants on any of the skin sites investigated in this study. Thus, this study suggests that daily patient bathing with 2% Chlorhexidine impregnated cloths or 0.08% Octenidine wash mitts does not impact skin microbiome structures and antibiotic resistance gene accumulation in ICU patients when compared to non-antiseptic water and soap bathing routine.

无菌洗浴策略对ICU患者皮肤微生物组的短期和长期影响。
在重症监护病房(ICU),使用消毒剂(如氯己定和奥替尼定)洗浴策略已被广泛采用,以减轻感染风险。然而,人们担心它们对皮肤微生物群结构的长期影响和潜在的意想不到的后果,包括抗生素交叉耐药性。这项纵向研究描述了与标准水洗和肥皂浴相比,这两种消毒洗浴策略对ICU患者皮肤微生物组的组成变化。样本采集于三臂随机去菌落试验(注册号DRKS00010475)。采用培养法、16S rrna基因扩增子测序法和多重Taq-Man法对5个不同地点和3个时间点的皮肤拭子进行抗菌耐药基因(ARG)检测。我们的研究结果表明,通过分子和培养方法测量,氯己定沐浴导致不同皮肤部位细菌生物量的持续减少。因此,微生物结构的多样性和分类组成基本保持不变。然而,在ICU患者皮肤上观察到的微生物组位点特异性的丧失与所采用的沐浴策略无关,即使在出院后仍持续存在。在本研究中所调查的任何皮肤部位,消毒沐浴策略均未导致抗生素耐药决定因素的增加或积累。因此,本研究表明,与不含防腐剂的水和肥皂洗澡相比,每天用2%氯己定浸渍布或0.08%辛替尼定洗手手套洗澡对ICU患者的皮肤微生物群结构和抗生素耐药基因积累没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Medical Microbiology and Immunology (MMIM) publishes key findings on all aspects of the interrelationship between infectious agents and the immune system of their hosts. The journal´s main focus is original research work on intrinsic, innate or adaptive immune responses to viral, bacterial, fungal and parasitic (protozoan and helminthic) infections and on the virulence of the respective infectious pathogens. MMIM covers basic, translational as well as clinical research in infectious diseases and infectious disease immunology. Basic research using cell cultures, organoid, and animal models are welcome, provided that the models have a clinical correlate and address a relevant medical question. The journal also considers manuscripts on the epidemiology of infectious diseases, including the emergence and epidemic spreading of pathogens and the development of resistance to anti-infective therapies, and on novel vaccines and other innovative measurements of prevention. The following categories of manuscripts will not be considered for publication in MMIM: submissions of preliminary work, of merely descriptive data sets without investigation of mechanisms or of limited global interest, manuscripts on existing or novel anti-infective compounds, which focus on pharmaceutical or pharmacological aspects of the drugs, manuscripts on existing or modified vaccines, unless they report on experimental or clinical efficacy studies or provide new immunological information on their mode of action, manuscripts on the diagnostics of infectious diseases, unless they offer a novel concept to solve a pending diagnostic problem, case reports or case series, unless they are embedded in a study that focuses on the anti-infectious immune response and/or on the virulence of a pathogen.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信