Comparison of treatment patterns, efficacy and safety between generic and branded atorvastatin users in China: a multicenter, retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study.
Xiaoxuan Xing, Zhizhou Wang, Ke Wang, Yiming Hua, Xiaoxi Li, Kejia Le, Wenbing Ma, Yingyun Guan, Aiping Deng, Xiong Yun, Hongfu Cai, Yongning Lyu, Guoying Xiong, Min Yang, Siyang Wang, Chaojun Xue, Jing Zhang, Qiushi Guo, Song Hu, Jing Li, Xianzhe Dong, Lan Zhang
{"title":"Comparison of treatment patterns, efficacy and safety between generic and branded atorvastatin users in China: a multicenter, retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study.","authors":"Xiaoxuan Xing, Zhizhou Wang, Ke Wang, Yiming Hua, Xiaoxi Li, Kejia Le, Wenbing Ma, Yingyun Guan, Aiping Deng, Xiong Yun, Hongfu Cai, Yongning Lyu, Guoying Xiong, Min Yang, Siyang Wang, Chaojun Xue, Jing Zhang, Qiushi Guo, Song Hu, Jing Li, Xianzhe Dong, Lan Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s12944-025-02673-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate and compare the treatment patterns, effectiveness, and safety of generic and branded atorvastatin in China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter, retrospective cohort study collected and analyzed data from patients who initiated atorvastatin therapy for the first time across 16 hospitals between 2020 and 2022. Treatment patterns included adherence, persistence, switching, augmentation. Absolute reductions of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, total cholesterol, and triglycerides, LDL-C reduction ≥ 50%, and adverse events were assessed to measure efficacy and safety. Propensity score matching was utilized to control for potential confounding variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data of 359,159 patients were reviewed. The results indicated a greater proportion of patients the generic atorvastatin group (5772/39742 [14.5%]) exhibited good adherence compared to those in the branded atorvastatin group (3157/39742 [7.9%]; P < 0.001) with an odds ratio of 1.97 (95% CI 1.88-2.06; P < 0.001). In the generic atorvastatin group, a smaller proportion of patients discontinued treatment (35,621/39,742 [89.6%]) compared to the branded group (36,390/39742 [91.6%]; P < 0.001) This difference in treatment persistence was further reflected in the calculated hazard ratio, which was 0.85 (95% CI 0.84-0.86; P < 0.001), indicating a reduced risk of discontinuation in the generic group. Efficacy outcomes were comparable between two groups (all P > 0.05). Both groups exhibited a comparable incidence of most adverse events. Less fasting plasma glucose increase and fewer new-onset diabetes were observed in the generic group (0.01 mmol/L [IQR 0-0.58] vs 0.16 mmol/L [IQR 0-0.73]; P = 0.009; 664/28640 [2.3%] vs 1244/28640 [4.3%]; P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Generic atorvastatin had higher adherence and persistence and lower costs vs the branded drug, with no significant differences in efficacy and safety. Generic atorvastatin can be considered a viable option for dyslipidemia and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":18073,"journal":{"name":"Lipids in Health and Disease","volume":"24 1","pages":"248"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12281942/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lipids in Health and Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12944-025-02673-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: To evaluate and compare the treatment patterns, effectiveness, and safety of generic and branded atorvastatin in China.
Methods: This multicenter, retrospective cohort study collected and analyzed data from patients who initiated atorvastatin therapy for the first time across 16 hospitals between 2020 and 2022. Treatment patterns included adherence, persistence, switching, augmentation. Absolute reductions of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, total cholesterol, and triglycerides, LDL-C reduction ≥ 50%, and adverse events were assessed to measure efficacy and safety. Propensity score matching was utilized to control for potential confounding variables.
Results: Data of 359,159 patients were reviewed. The results indicated a greater proportion of patients the generic atorvastatin group (5772/39742 [14.5%]) exhibited good adherence compared to those in the branded atorvastatin group (3157/39742 [7.9%]; P < 0.001) with an odds ratio of 1.97 (95% CI 1.88-2.06; P < 0.001). In the generic atorvastatin group, a smaller proportion of patients discontinued treatment (35,621/39,742 [89.6%]) compared to the branded group (36,390/39742 [91.6%]; P < 0.001) This difference in treatment persistence was further reflected in the calculated hazard ratio, which was 0.85 (95% CI 0.84-0.86; P < 0.001), indicating a reduced risk of discontinuation in the generic group. Efficacy outcomes were comparable between two groups (all P > 0.05). Both groups exhibited a comparable incidence of most adverse events. Less fasting plasma glucose increase and fewer new-onset diabetes were observed in the generic group (0.01 mmol/L [IQR 0-0.58] vs 0.16 mmol/L [IQR 0-0.73]; P = 0.009; 664/28640 [2.3%] vs 1244/28640 [4.3%]; P < 0.001).
Conclusion: Generic atorvastatin had higher adherence and persistence and lower costs vs the branded drug, with no significant differences in efficacy and safety. Generic atorvastatin can be considered a viable option for dyslipidemia and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.
期刊介绍:
Lipids in Health and Disease is an open access, peer-reviewed, journal that publishes articles on all aspects of lipids: their biochemistry, pharmacology, toxicology, role in health and disease, and the synthesis of new lipid compounds.
Lipids in Health and Disease is aimed at all scientists, health professionals and physicians interested in the area of lipids. Lipids are defined here in their broadest sense, to include: cholesterol, essential fatty acids, saturated fatty acids, phospholipids, inositol lipids, second messenger lipids, enzymes and synthetic machinery that is involved in the metabolism of various lipids in the cells and tissues, and also various aspects of lipid transport, etc. In addition, the journal also publishes research that investigates and defines the role of lipids in various physiological processes, pathology and disease. In particular, the journal aims to bridge the gap between the bench and the clinic by publishing articles that are particularly relevant to human diseases and the role of lipids in the management of various diseases.