The Hazard Ratio Is Equivalent to an Odds Under the Assumption of Proportional Hazards.

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews Pub Date : 2025-07-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.17294/2330-0698.2156
David M Thompson
{"title":"The Hazard Ratio Is Equivalent to an Odds Under the Assumption of Proportional Hazards.","authors":"David M Thompson","doi":"10.17294/2330-0698.2156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinicians routinely interpret statistical findings from medical research to inform patients of treatment benefits. Studies that use the hazard ratio present special challenges. Clinicians should not equate hazard ratios with risk ratios, ie, relative risks. However, clinicians can provide patients with a straightforward interpretation of the hazard ratio as an odds, as long as the ratio was calculated in a study in which the assumption of proportional hazards is justified. In such a case, the hazard ratio is equivalent to the odds that a person, who is randomly chosen from the group represented in the ratio's numerator, experiences an event before a randomly chosen person from the group represented in the ratio's denominator. A mathematical derivation for the equivalence is provided to further clarify this idea for clinicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":16724,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews","volume":"12 3","pages":"140-143"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12279308/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17294/2330-0698.2156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinicians routinely interpret statistical findings from medical research to inform patients of treatment benefits. Studies that use the hazard ratio present special challenges. Clinicians should not equate hazard ratios with risk ratios, ie, relative risks. However, clinicians can provide patients with a straightforward interpretation of the hazard ratio as an odds, as long as the ratio was calculated in a study in which the assumption of proportional hazards is justified. In such a case, the hazard ratio is equivalent to the odds that a person, who is randomly chosen from the group represented in the ratio's numerator, experiences an event before a randomly chosen person from the group represented in the ratio's denominator. A mathematical derivation for the equivalence is provided to further clarify this idea for clinicians.

在风险成比例的假设下,风险比等于赔率。
临床医生通常会解释医学研究的统计结果,以告知患者治疗的益处。使用风险比的研究面临着特殊的挑战。临床医生不应将危险比等同于风险比,即相对风险。然而,临床医生可以为患者提供一个直接的解释,即风险比的几率,只要该比率是在一个假设成比例风险是合理的研究中计算出来的。在这种情况下,风险比等于从比率分子所代表的群体中随机选出的一个人比从比率分母所代表的群体中随机选出的另一个人经历事件的几率。等效性的数学推导为临床医生提供了进一步澄清这一想法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews
Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
5.90%
发文量
35
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信