Can Interpersonal Trust Predict and Account for Symptom Change During Group Cognitive Processing Therapy for PTSD? An Investigation of the Iterated Trust Game.

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
M Wright Williams, Christopher Hunt, David P Graham, Matt Estey, Lia Smith, Katherine McCurry, Brooks King-Casas, Pearl Chiu
{"title":"Can Interpersonal Trust Predict and Account for Symptom Change During Group Cognitive Processing Therapy for PTSD? An Investigation of the Iterated Trust Game.","authors":"M Wright Williams, Christopher Hunt, David P Graham, Matt Estey, Lia Smith, Katherine McCurry, Brooks King-Casas, Pearl Chiu","doi":"10.1002/jclp.70020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Group cognitive processing therapy (GCPT) is frequently utilized to treat PTSD within the VA healthcare system, but its mechanisms are not well understood. Interpersonal trust could be an important change process in GCPT given its relevance to group-based therapy and its role in CPT, but self-report measures are inadequate for capturing the dynamic interplay that defines interpersonal trust. Here, we examined the degree to which interpersonal could predict and account for PTSD symptom change in GCPT using the iterated trust game (ITG)-a behavioral task used to approximate real-world trust behavior.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were Veterans with PTSD who participated in an effectiveness trial comparing a 12-week course of GCPT (n = 37) to a treatment-as-usual (TAU) waitlist condition (n = 23) of equivalent length. Both groups completed the ITG and measures of PTSD before and after treatment as well as a pencil-paper measure of interpersonal trust before treatment. Participants in GCPT completed measures of PTSD severity, group relationship quality, and therapist relationship quality at each treatment session.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pre-post changes in ITG-measured trust behavior did not differ between GCPT and TAU (p = 0.075). However, improvements in ITG scores partially accounted for decreased PTSD symptoms in GCPT, as demonstrated by a more modest change in PTSD symptoms when ITG was in, b = -5.95, p = 0.032, versus not in the model, b = -9.05, p = 0.001. Additionally, higher ITG scores, but not self-reported trust, predicted steeper reductions in PTSD symptoms, b = -0.50, p = 0.042, and improvements in group relationship quality, b = 0.28, p = 0.037, across GCPT sessions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Interpersonal trust improvement may predict and account for symptom change in GCPT. Targeting interpersonal trust during GCPT could render the treatment more effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":15395,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.70020","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Group cognitive processing therapy (GCPT) is frequently utilized to treat PTSD within the VA healthcare system, but its mechanisms are not well understood. Interpersonal trust could be an important change process in GCPT given its relevance to group-based therapy and its role in CPT, but self-report measures are inadequate for capturing the dynamic interplay that defines interpersonal trust. Here, we examined the degree to which interpersonal could predict and account for PTSD symptom change in GCPT using the iterated trust game (ITG)-a behavioral task used to approximate real-world trust behavior.

Methods: Participants were Veterans with PTSD who participated in an effectiveness trial comparing a 12-week course of GCPT (n = 37) to a treatment-as-usual (TAU) waitlist condition (n = 23) of equivalent length. Both groups completed the ITG and measures of PTSD before and after treatment as well as a pencil-paper measure of interpersonal trust before treatment. Participants in GCPT completed measures of PTSD severity, group relationship quality, and therapist relationship quality at each treatment session.

Results: Pre-post changes in ITG-measured trust behavior did not differ between GCPT and TAU (p = 0.075). However, improvements in ITG scores partially accounted for decreased PTSD symptoms in GCPT, as demonstrated by a more modest change in PTSD symptoms when ITG was in, b = -5.95, p = 0.032, versus not in the model, b = -9.05, p = 0.001. Additionally, higher ITG scores, but not self-reported trust, predicted steeper reductions in PTSD symptoms, b = -0.50, p = 0.042, and improvements in group relationship quality, b = 0.28, p = 0.037, across GCPT sessions.

Conclusions: Interpersonal trust improvement may predict and account for symptom change in GCPT. Targeting interpersonal trust during GCPT could render the treatment more effective.

人际信任能否预测和解释PTSD群体认知加工治疗过程中的症状改变?迭代信任博弈的研究。
目的:群体认知加工疗法(GCPT)在VA医疗保健系统中经常用于治疗PTSD,但其机制尚不清楚。人际信任可能是GCPT中一个重要的变化过程,因为它与群体治疗相关,而且它在CPT中的作用,但自我报告的措施不足以捕捉定义人际信任的动态相互作用。在这里,我们使用迭代信任游戏(ITG)来检验人际关系对GCPT患者PTSD症状变化的预测和解释程度。ITG是一种用来近似真实世界信任行为的行为任务。方法:参与者是患有创伤后应激障碍的退伍军人,他们参加了一项有效性试验,比较了12周的GCPT疗程(n = 37)和同等长度的治疗(TAU)等待名单条件(n = 23)。两组均完成治疗前后的ITG和PTSD测量,以及治疗前人际信任的铅笔纸测量。GCPT的参与者在每次治疗过程中完成创伤后应激障碍严重程度、群体关系质量和治疗师关系质量的测量。结果:itg测量的信任行为在GCPT和TAU之间的前后变化没有差异(p = 0.075)。然而,ITG评分的改善部分解释了GCPT中PTSD症状的减少,正如ITG在模型中较温和的PTSD症状变化所证明的那样,b = -5.95, p = 0.032,而在模型中没有,b = -9.05, p = 0.001。此外,更高的ITG分数,而不是自我报告的信任,预示着创伤后应激障碍症状的急剧减少,b = -0.50, p = 0.042,以及群体关系质量的改善,b = 0.28, p = 0.037,在GCPT期间。结论:人际信任改善可以预测和解释GCPT的症状改变。在GCPT中以人际信任为目标可以使治疗更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Psychology
Journal of Clinical Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.30%
发文量
177
期刊介绍: Founded in 1945, the Journal of Clinical Psychology is a peer-reviewed forum devoted to research, assessment, and practice. Published eight times a year, the Journal includes research studies; articles on contemporary professional issues, single case research; brief reports (including dissertations in brief); notes from the field; and news and notes. In addition to papers on psychopathology, psychodiagnostics, and the psychotherapeutic process, the journal welcomes articles focusing on psychotherapy effectiveness research, psychological assessment and treatment matching, clinical outcomes, clinical health psychology, and behavioral medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信