{"title":"Six-month comparative outcomes of aflibercept and faricimab in treatment-naïve macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion.","authors":"Taiichi Hikichi, Haruka Kurabe, Amane Notoya, Yuuna Oguro, Misaki Hirano, Yumeka Doi","doi":"10.1007/s10384-025-01254-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the 6-month outcomes of aflibercept and faricimab in treatment-naïve macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVOME).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The charts of consecutive treatment-naïve eyes with BRVOME treated with intravitreal injection therapy between December 2023 and August 2024 at Hikichi Eye Clinic (Sapporo, Japan) were reviewed; all eyes treated between December 2023 and April 2024 were administrated with aflibercept and all eyes treated between May 2024 and August 2024 were administrated with faricimab. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central foveal thickness (CFT) were assessed at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months. Injection frequency and safety were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-four eyes (29 aflibercept, 25 faricimab) were included. Both groups showed significant improvement in BCVA (from 0.39 ± 0.29 to 0.09 ± 0.23) and CFT (from 617 ± 132 to 201 ± 68 µm) over 6 months (p < 0.001). The mean number of injections was significantly lower in the faricimab group (1.96 ± 0.68) than the aflibercept group (2.45 ± 0.87; p = 0.024). No serious adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Faricimab achieved similar visual and anatomical outcomes to aflibercept while requiring fewer injections, suggesting a potential advantage in reducing treatment burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":14563,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-025-01254-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the 6-month outcomes of aflibercept and faricimab in treatment-naïve macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVOME).
Study design: Retrospective observational study.
Methods: The charts of consecutive treatment-naïve eyes with BRVOME treated with intravitreal injection therapy between December 2023 and August 2024 at Hikichi Eye Clinic (Sapporo, Japan) were reviewed; all eyes treated between December 2023 and April 2024 were administrated with aflibercept and all eyes treated between May 2024 and August 2024 were administrated with faricimab. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central foveal thickness (CFT) were assessed at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months. Injection frequency and safety were also evaluated.
Results: Fifty-four eyes (29 aflibercept, 25 faricimab) were included. Both groups showed significant improvement in BCVA (from 0.39 ± 0.29 to 0.09 ± 0.23) and CFT (from 617 ± 132 to 201 ± 68 µm) over 6 months (p < 0.001). The mean number of injections was significantly lower in the faricimab group (1.96 ± 0.68) than the aflibercept group (2.45 ± 0.87; p = 0.024). No serious adverse events were reported.
Conclusion: Faricimab achieved similar visual and anatomical outcomes to aflibercept while requiring fewer injections, suggesting a potential advantage in reducing treatment burden.
期刊介绍:
The Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology (JJO) was inaugurated in 1957 as a quarterly journal published in English by the Ophthalmology Department of the University of Tokyo, with the aim of disseminating the achievements of Japanese ophthalmologists worldwide. JJO remains the only Japanese ophthalmology journal published in English. In 1997, the Japanese Ophthalmological Society assumed the responsibility for publishing the Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology as its official English-language publication.
Currently the journal is published bimonthly and accepts papers from authors worldwide. JJO has become an international interdisciplinary forum for the publication of basic science and clinical research papers.