Medium- to Long-Term Follow-Up Study on Modified Manchester Procedure for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Yan Chen, Shuqiong Xu, Na Luo, Lingying Du
{"title":"Medium- to Long-Term Follow-Up Study on Modified Manchester Procedure for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.","authors":"Yan Chen, Shuqiong Xu, Na Luo, Lingying Du","doi":"10.1007/s00192-025-06237-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>We evaluated the complications and medium- to long-term therapeutic outcomes of the modified Manchester procedure for pelvic organ prolapse.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The clinical data of 254 patients who underwent the modified Manchester procedure in our hospital from July 2015 to May 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. In addition, the perioperative situation and medium- to long-term follow-up results were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No injury to the adjacent organs (such as the bladder and ureter) or complications (including massive hemorrhage or hematoma) were reported in 254 patients during the operation. During the perioperative period, urinary retention, postoperative fever, and urinary tract infections were observed in 19 patients (7.5%), 13 patients (5.1%), and three patients (1.2%), respectively. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 8.8 years, with a median follow-up time of 4.18 (2.46, 6.15) years, and 173 patients (68%) completed telephonic or outpatient follow-up. Among them, 16 patients (9.25%) had subjective recurrence. Of these 16 patients, three (1.7%) had failed surgery, nine (5.2%) had de novo stress urinary incontinence, and two (1.2%) had dysuria. The most serious complications were grade III according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. After the operation, the subjective satisfaction rate of the PGI-I questionnaire was 94.8%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The modified Manchester procedure for pelvic organ prolapse has a low incidence of severe complications, has satisfactory medium- to long-term therapeutic outcomes, and shows favorable safety and efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":14355,"journal":{"name":"International Urogynecology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urogynecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-025-06237-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: We evaluated the complications and medium- to long-term therapeutic outcomes of the modified Manchester procedure for pelvic organ prolapse.

Methods: The clinical data of 254 patients who underwent the modified Manchester procedure in our hospital from July 2015 to May 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. In addition, the perioperative situation and medium- to long-term follow-up results were analyzed.

Results: No injury to the adjacent organs (such as the bladder and ureter) or complications (including massive hemorrhage or hematoma) were reported in 254 patients during the operation. During the perioperative period, urinary retention, postoperative fever, and urinary tract infections were observed in 19 patients (7.5%), 13 patients (5.1%), and three patients (1.2%), respectively. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 8.8 years, with a median follow-up time of 4.18 (2.46, 6.15) years, and 173 patients (68%) completed telephonic or outpatient follow-up. Among them, 16 patients (9.25%) had subjective recurrence. Of these 16 patients, three (1.7%) had failed surgery, nine (5.2%) had de novo stress urinary incontinence, and two (1.2%) had dysuria. The most serious complications were grade III according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. After the operation, the subjective satisfaction rate of the PGI-I questionnaire was 94.8%.

Conclusions: The modified Manchester procedure for pelvic organ prolapse has a low incidence of severe complications, has satisfactory medium- to long-term therapeutic outcomes, and shows favorable safety and efficacy.

改良曼彻斯特手术治疗盆腔器官脱垂的中长期随访研究。
前言和假设:我们评估了改良曼彻斯特手术治疗盆腔器官脱垂的并发症和中长期治疗结果。方法:回顾性分析2015年7月至2023年5月在我院行改良曼彻斯特手术的254例患者的临床资料。并对围手术期情况及中长期随访结果进行分析。结果:254例患者术中未发生邻近脏器(如膀胱、输尿管)损伤及大出血、血肿等并发症。围手术期尿潴留19例(7.5%),术后发热13例(5.1%),尿路感染3例(1.2%)。随访时间为1 ~ 8.8年,中位随访时间为4.18年(2.46年,6.15年),173例(68%)患者完成电话或门诊随访。其中主观复发16例(9.25%)。在这16例患者中,3例(1.7%)手术失败,9例(5.2%)有新生压力性尿失禁,2例(1.2%)有排尿困难。根据Clavien-Dindo分级,最严重的并发症为III级。术后PGI-I问卷主观满意率为94.8%。结论:改良曼彻斯特手术治疗盆腔器官脱垂严重并发症发生率低,中长期治疗效果满意,安全性和有效性较好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
406
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Urogynecology Journal is the official journal of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).The International Urogynecology Journal has evolved in response to a perceived need amongst the clinicians, scientists, and researchers active in the field of urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders. Gynecologists, urologists, physiotherapists, nurses and basic scientists require regular means of communication within this field of pelvic floor dysfunction to express new ideas and research, and to review clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of women with disorders of the pelvic floor. This Journal has adopted the peer review process for all original contributions and will maintain high standards with regard to the research published therein. The clinical approach to urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders will be emphasized with each issue containing clinically relevant material that will be immediately applicable for clinical medicine. This publication covers all aspects of the field in an interdisciplinary fashion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信