Li Yu, Xuan Tang, Dandan Gong, Changfeng Man, Yu Fan
{"title":"Prefrailty prevalence and all-cause mortality risk in older adults from the general population: A meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.","authors":"Li Yu, Xuan Tang, Dandan Gong, Changfeng Man, Yu Fan","doi":"10.1111/ggi.70133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Prefrailty represents an intermediate stage between robust health and frailty. This meta-analysis aimed to estimate the global prevalence of prefrailty and evaluate its association with all-cause mortality in older adults from the general population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two independent reviewers systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase for relevant studies published through to December 10, 2024. Eligible studies reported either prefrailty prevalence or all-cause mortality risk in older adults from the general population aged 65 years and older.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 26 studies (25 articles; N = 222 473). The included studies utilized the Fried frailty phenotype and frailty index to define prefrailty. The pooled prefrailty prevalence was 45% (95% confidence interval [CI] 42-48%), with similar rates across assessment methods. Prefrailty significantly increased all-cause mortality risk (hazard ratio [HR] 1.38; 95% CI 1.32-1.45). Sex-specific analyses showed a marginally higher risk in men (HR 1.39; 95% CI 1.30-1.49) than in women (HR 1.33; 95% CI 1.25-1.41). Mortality associations were stronger when prefrailty was defined by the frailty index (HR 1.47; 95% CI 1.35-1.61) than by phenotype (HR 1.37; 95% CI 1.32-1.42).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nearly half of older adults exhibit prefrailty, which confers a 38% increased mortality risk in older adults from the general population. These findings underscore the need for early identification and intervention in this high-risk subgroup. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2025; ••: ••-••.</p>","PeriodicalId":12546,"journal":{"name":"Geriatrics & Gerontology International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatrics & Gerontology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.70133","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: Prefrailty represents an intermediate stage between robust health and frailty. This meta-analysis aimed to estimate the global prevalence of prefrailty and evaluate its association with all-cause mortality in older adults from the general population.
Methods: Two independent reviewers systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase for relevant studies published through to December 10, 2024. Eligible studies reported either prefrailty prevalence or all-cause mortality risk in older adults from the general population aged 65 years and older.
Results: The analysis included 26 studies (25 articles; N = 222 473). The included studies utilized the Fried frailty phenotype and frailty index to define prefrailty. The pooled prefrailty prevalence was 45% (95% confidence interval [CI] 42-48%), with similar rates across assessment methods. Prefrailty significantly increased all-cause mortality risk (hazard ratio [HR] 1.38; 95% CI 1.32-1.45). Sex-specific analyses showed a marginally higher risk in men (HR 1.39; 95% CI 1.30-1.49) than in women (HR 1.33; 95% CI 1.25-1.41). Mortality associations were stronger when prefrailty was defined by the frailty index (HR 1.47; 95% CI 1.35-1.61) than by phenotype (HR 1.37; 95% CI 1.32-1.42).
Conclusions: Nearly half of older adults exhibit prefrailty, which confers a 38% increased mortality risk in older adults from the general population. These findings underscore the need for early identification and intervention in this high-risk subgroup. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2025; ••: ••-••.
目的:脆弱是介于健康和虚弱之间的一个中间阶段。本荟萃分析旨在估计全球患病率,并评估其与普通人群中老年人全因死亡率的关系。方法:两位独立审稿人系统检索PubMed、Web of Science和Embase截至2024年12月10日发表的相关研究。符合条件的研究报告了65岁及以上普通人群中老年人的患病率或全因死亡率风险。结果:纳入26项研究(25篇;n = 222 473)。纳入的研究利用Fried脆弱表型和脆弱指数来定义易感性。合并患病率为45%(95%可信区间[CI] 42-48%),各种评估方法的患病率相似。偏好显著增加全因死亡风险(危险比[HR] 1.38;95% ci 1.32-1.45)。性别特异性分析显示,男性的风险略高(HR 1.39;95% CI 1.30-1.49)高于女性(HR 1.33;95% ci 1.25-1.41)。当脆弱性由虚弱指数定义时,死亡率相关性更强(HR 1.47;95% CI 1.35-1.61)比表型(HR 1.37;95% ci 1.32-1.42)。结论:近一半的老年人表现出易感性,这使得老年人的死亡风险比一般人群高38%。这些发现强调了对这一高危亚群进行早期识别和干预的必要性。Geriatr Gerontol 2025;••: ••-••.
期刊介绍:
Geriatrics & Gerontology International is the official Journal of the Japan Geriatrics Society, reflecting the growing importance of the subject area in developed economies and their particular significance to a country like Japan with a large aging population. Geriatrics & Gerontology International is now an international publication with contributions from around the world and published four times per year.