{"title":"Implementation challenges of single-instillation intravesical chemotherapy following transurethral resection of bladder tumor.","authors":"Kamil Malshy, Alexis Steinmetz, Edward M Messing","doi":"10.1080/14737140.2025.2537793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite strong evidence supporting its effectiveness, single, immediate instillation of intravesical chemotherapy (SI-IVC) following transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) remains vastly underutilized in managing low- and intermediate-risk non - non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). This review addresses the gap between evidence and practice in adopting this cost-effective, recurrence-reducing intervention and offers potential solutions through an implementation science approach.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>We examined the clinical benefits of SI-IVC based on landmark trials and meta-analyses across various agents, including mitomycin and gemcitabine. A targeted literature review was conducted using PubMed and major urology guidelines to identify studies assessing efficacy, utilization rates, and barriers to implementation. Particular focus is given to logistical and systems-based challenges limiting real-world application, including issues with drug availability, perioperative workflow, and post-resection coordination. We also discuss strategies informed by an implementation science framework, including planning and system engagement, executing interventions, and evaluating their impact within hospital systems.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Incorporating SI-IVC into routine practice requires pragmatic, system-level changes that address logistical barriers rather than clinical hesitancy. With institutional support and streamlined protocols, SI-IVC can be more consistently delivered, however, local adaptation and fine-tuning remain essential, as healthcare systems and available personnel vary across institutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12099,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2025.2537793","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Despite strong evidence supporting its effectiveness, single, immediate instillation of intravesical chemotherapy (SI-IVC) following transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) remains vastly underutilized in managing low- and intermediate-risk non - non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). This review addresses the gap between evidence and practice in adopting this cost-effective, recurrence-reducing intervention and offers potential solutions through an implementation science approach.
Areas covered: We examined the clinical benefits of SI-IVC based on landmark trials and meta-analyses across various agents, including mitomycin and gemcitabine. A targeted literature review was conducted using PubMed and major urology guidelines to identify studies assessing efficacy, utilization rates, and barriers to implementation. Particular focus is given to logistical and systems-based challenges limiting real-world application, including issues with drug availability, perioperative workflow, and post-resection coordination. We also discuss strategies informed by an implementation science framework, including planning and system engagement, executing interventions, and evaluating their impact within hospital systems.
Expert opinion: Incorporating SI-IVC into routine practice requires pragmatic, system-level changes that address logistical barriers rather than clinical hesitancy. With institutional support and streamlined protocols, SI-IVC can be more consistently delivered, however, local adaptation and fine-tuning remain essential, as healthcare systems and available personnel vary across institutions.
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy (ISSN 1473-7140) provides expert appraisal and commentary on the major trends in cancer care and highlights the performance of new therapeutic and diagnostic approaches.
Coverage includes tumor management, novel medicines, anticancer agents and chemotherapy, biological therapy, cancer vaccines, therapeutic indications, biomarkers and diagnostics, and treatment guidelines. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review, and the journal makes an essential contribution to decision-making in cancer care.
Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Review format and includes the following sections:
Expert Opinion - a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results
Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.