Risk factors for unintentional medication discrepancies identified through pharmacy staff-led medication reconciliation to prioritise patients in the emergency department: a rapid review.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Busra Dinc, Charlotte Olesen, Faruk Coric, Helle Houlbjerg Carlsen
{"title":"Risk factors for unintentional medication discrepancies identified through pharmacy staff-led medication reconciliation to prioritise patients in the emergency department: a rapid review.","authors":"Busra Dinc, Charlotte Olesen, Faruk Coric, Helle Houlbjerg Carlsen","doi":"10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to identify the risk factors associated with unintentional medication discrepancies identified through pharmacy staff-led medication reconciliation in emergency departments across multiple countries. The long-term goal is to support the development of a model to systematically prioritise patients at high risk in these settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This rapid review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A literature search of the PubMed database was performed on 8 October 2024. Studies were selected based on predefined eligibility criteria defined by the PICO framework- Population: adult emergency patients (aged ≥18 years) admitted to the emergency department; Intervention: medication reconciliation conducted by pharmacy staff; Comparator: standard medication reconciliation or standard care; Outcome: risk factors for unintentional medication discrepancies identified through pharmacy staff-led medication reconciliation in the emergency department. All included studies were qualitatively assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The literature search yielded 433 citations, of which 15 studies met the eligibility criteria. The included studies primarily investigated patient, medication and setting-related risk factors, encompassing a total of 15 264 patients who received pharmacy staff-led medication reconciliation in emergency departments across seven countries. A consistent pattern of risk factors emerged, including advanced age and polypharmacy. Only one study found that admissions during night-time or weekend hours were significantly associated with medication discrepancies. Differences in health IT systems and reconciliation practices were also noted across countries.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Advanced age and polypharmacy were consistently associated with unintentional medication discrepancies. Future research should address variations in health IT systems and focus on developing robust prioritisation models to optimise medication reconciliation processes and improve patient safety. Increasing pharmacy staff capacity may further support this goal.</p>","PeriodicalId":12050,"journal":{"name":"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004526","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to identify the risk factors associated with unintentional medication discrepancies identified through pharmacy staff-led medication reconciliation in emergency departments across multiple countries. The long-term goal is to support the development of a model to systematically prioritise patients at high risk in these settings.

Methods: This rapid review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A literature search of the PubMed database was performed on 8 October 2024. Studies were selected based on predefined eligibility criteria defined by the PICO framework- Population: adult emergency patients (aged ≥18 years) admitted to the emergency department; Intervention: medication reconciliation conducted by pharmacy staff; Comparator: standard medication reconciliation or standard care; Outcome: risk factors for unintentional medication discrepancies identified through pharmacy staff-led medication reconciliation in the emergency department. All included studies were qualitatively assessed.

Results: The literature search yielded 433 citations, of which 15 studies met the eligibility criteria. The included studies primarily investigated patient, medication and setting-related risk factors, encompassing a total of 15 264 patients who received pharmacy staff-led medication reconciliation in emergency departments across seven countries. A consistent pattern of risk factors emerged, including advanced age and polypharmacy. Only one study found that admissions during night-time or weekend hours were significantly associated with medication discrepancies. Differences in health IT systems and reconciliation practices were also noted across countries.

Conclusions: Advanced age and polypharmacy were consistently associated with unintentional medication discrepancies. Future research should address variations in health IT systems and focus on developing robust prioritisation models to optimise medication reconciliation processes and improve patient safety. Increasing pharmacy staff capacity may further support this goal.

通过药房工作人员主导的药物调解确定意外药物差异的风险因素,以优先考虑急诊科的患者:快速审查。
目的:本研究旨在通过多个国家急诊科药房工作人员主导的药物调解,确定与意外用药差异相关的危险因素。长期目标是支持开发一种模式,系统地优先考虑这些环境中的高风险患者。方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行快速回顾。于2024年10月8日对PubMed数据库进行文献检索。研究是根据PICO框架定义的预先确定的资格标准选择的——人群:急诊科收治的成年急诊患者(年龄≥18岁);干预:由药学人员进行药物和解;比较者:标准药物调节或标准护理;结果:通过急诊科药房工作人员主导的药物调解确定意外用药差异的危险因素。所有纳入的研究都进行了定性评估。结果:检索文献共被引433次,其中符合入选标准的文献15篇。纳入的研究主要调查了患者、药物和环境相关的风险因素,包括在七个国家的急诊科接受药房工作人员主导的药物调节的总共15264名患者。出现了一致的风险因素模式,包括高龄和多种药物。只有一项研究发现,夜间或周末入院与用药差异显著相关。还注意到各国在卫生信息技术系统和协调做法方面的差异。结论:高龄和多种用药始终与非故意用药差异相关。未来的研究应该解决医疗信息技术系统的变化,并将重点放在开发强大的优先级模型上,以优化药物调节过程并提高患者安全。增加药房工作人员的能力可能会进一步支持这一目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
104
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy (EJHP) offers a high quality, peer-reviewed platform for the publication of practical and innovative research which aims to strengthen the profile and professional status of hospital pharmacists. EJHP is committed to being the leading journal on all aspects of hospital pharmacy, thereby advancing the science, practice and profession of hospital pharmacy. The journal aims to become a major source for education and inspiration to improve practice and the standard of patient care in hospitals and related institutions worldwide. EJHP is the only official journal of the European Association of Hospital Pharmacists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信