Palivizumab for preventing severe respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection in children.

IF 8.8 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Luis Garegnani, Pablo Roson Rodriguez, Camila Micaela Escobar Liquitay, Ignacio Esteban, Juan Va Franco
{"title":"Palivizumab for preventing severe respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection in children.","authors":"Luis Garegnani, Pablo Roson Rodriguez, Camila Micaela Escobar Liquitay, Ignacio Esteban, Juan Va Franco","doi":"10.1002/14651858.CD013757.pub3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Respiratory viruses are the leading cause of lower respiratory tract infection and hospitalisation in infants and young children. Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the main infectious agent in this population. Palivizumab is administered intramuscularly every month for five months in the first RSV season to prevent serious RSV lower respiratory tract infection in children. Given its high cost, it is essential to know if palivizumab continues to be effective in preventing severe RSV disease in children.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the effects of palivizumab in preventing severe RSV infection in children.</p><p><strong>Search methods: </strong>We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, CINAHL, Scopus, and two trials registers from the inception of each database to July 2024 with no language or publication status restrictions.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and cluster-RCTs in children 0 to 24 months of age of any gender, regardless of RSV infection history, comparing palivizumab given at a dose of 15 mg/kg once a month (maximum five doses) with placebo, no intervention, or standard care.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>The critical outcomes were hospitalisation due to RSV infection, all-cause mortality, and adverse events. Important outcomes were hospitalisation due to respiratory-related illness, length of hospital stay, RSV infection, number of wheezing days, days of supplemental oxygen, intensive care unit length of stay, and mechanical ventilation days.</p><p><strong>Risk of bias: </strong>We used Cochrane's RoB 2 tool to assess risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Synthesis methods: </strong>We conducted meta-analyses using random-effects models to calculate risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes, both with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome.</p><p><strong>Included studies: </strong>We included one new trial in this update, bringing the total number of RCTs to six studies with 3611 children. All studies were parallel RCTs assessing the effects of 15 mg/kg of palivizumab every month for up to five months, compared to placebo or no intervention in an outpatient setting, although one study also included hospitalised infants, and another study administered palivizumab intranasally. Most of the included studies were conducted in children with a high risk of severe RSV infection due to comorbidities like bronchopulmonary dysplasia or congenital heart disease.</p><p><strong>Synthesis of results: </strong>Systemic palivizumab reduces hospitalisation due to RSV infection at two years' follow-up (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.64; I² = 23%; 5 studies, 3343 participants; high-certainty evidence). Based on 98 hospitalisations per 1000 participants in the placebo group, this corresponds to 43 (29 to 62) per 1000 participants in the palivizumab group. Intranasal palivizumab may increase hospitalisation due to RSV infection compared to placebo or no intervention at two years' follow-up (RR 2.33, 95% CI 0.64 to 8.48; 1 study, 94 participants; low-certainty evidence due to serious concerns about imprecision). Based on 64 hospitalisations per 1000 participants in the placebo group, this corresponds to 149 (41 to 541) per 1000 participants in the palivizumab group. Palivizumab probably results in little to no difference in mortality at two years' follow-up (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.15; I² = 0%; 5 studies, 3343 participants; moderate-certainty evidence due to concerns about imprecision). Based on 23 deaths per 1000 participants in the placebo group, this corresponds to 16 (10 to 27) per 1000 participants in the palivizumab group. Palivizumab probably results in little to no difference in adverse events at 150 days' follow-up (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.38; I² = 0%; 4 studies, 3099 participants; moderate-certainty evidence due to concerns about imprecision). Based on 78 cases per 1000 participants in the placebo group, this corresponds to 84 (66 to 107) per 1000 participants in the palivizumab group. Palivizumab probably results in a slight reduction in hospitalisation due to respiratory-related illness at two years' follow-up (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.99; I² = 41%; 6 studies, 3437 participants; moderate-certainty evidence due to concerns about imprecision). Systemic palivizumab may result in a large reduction in RSV infection at two years' follow-up (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.55; I² = 0%; 3 studies, 554 participants; low-certainty evidence due to serious concerns about imprecision). Intranasal palivizumab may increase RSV infection compared to placebo or no intervention at two years' follow-up (RR 1.64, 95% CI 0.87 to 3.08; 1 study, 94 participants; low-certainty evidence due to serious concerns about imprecision). Systemic palivizumab also reduces the number of wheezing days at one-year follow-up (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.44; 1 study, 429 participants; high-certainty evidence). Intranasal palivizumab may result in little to no difference in the mean fraction of wheezing days (mean fraction of wheezing days of 0.94, 95% CI -1.9 to 3.5; 1 study, 93 participants; low-certainty evidence). The risk of bias in outcomes across all studies was similar and predominantly low.</p><p><strong>Authors' conclusions: </strong>Based on the available evidence, prophylaxis with systemic palivizumab reduces hospitalisation due to RSV infection and probably results in little to no difference in mortality. Intranasal palivizumab may increase hospitalisation due to RSV infection. Palivizumab probably results in little to no difference in adverse events. Moreover, palivizumab probably results in a slight reduction in hospitalisation due to respiratory-related illness. Systemic palivizumab may result in a large reduction in RSV infections, whilst intranasal palivizumab may increase RSV infection. Systemic palivizumab also reduces the number of wheezing days, whilst intranasal palivizumab may result in little to no difference in the mean fraction of wheezing days. These results may be applicable to children with a high risk of severe RSV infection due to comorbidities. Further research is needed to establish the effect of palivizumab in children with other comorbidities known as risk factors for severe RSV disease (e.g. immune deficiencies) and other social determinants of the disease, including children living in low- and middle-income countries, tropical regions, children lacking breastfeeding, living in poverty, or members of families in overcrowded situations.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This Cochrane review had no dedicated funding.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>Protocol (2020): doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013757 First review version (2021): doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013757.pub2.</p>","PeriodicalId":10473,"journal":{"name":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","volume":"7 ","pages":"CD013757"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12284916/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013757.pub3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: Respiratory viruses are the leading cause of lower respiratory tract infection and hospitalisation in infants and young children. Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the main infectious agent in this population. Palivizumab is administered intramuscularly every month for five months in the first RSV season to prevent serious RSV lower respiratory tract infection in children. Given its high cost, it is essential to know if palivizumab continues to be effective in preventing severe RSV disease in children.

Objectives: To assess the effects of palivizumab in preventing severe RSV infection in children.

Search methods: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, CINAHL, Scopus, and two trials registers from the inception of each database to July 2024 with no language or publication status restrictions.

Eligibility criteria: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and cluster-RCTs in children 0 to 24 months of age of any gender, regardless of RSV infection history, comparing palivizumab given at a dose of 15 mg/kg once a month (maximum five doses) with placebo, no intervention, or standard care.

Outcomes: The critical outcomes were hospitalisation due to RSV infection, all-cause mortality, and adverse events. Important outcomes were hospitalisation due to respiratory-related illness, length of hospital stay, RSV infection, number of wheezing days, days of supplemental oxygen, intensive care unit length of stay, and mechanical ventilation days.

Risk of bias: We used Cochrane's RoB 2 tool to assess risk of bias.

Synthesis methods: We conducted meta-analyses using random-effects models to calculate risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes, both with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome.

Included studies: We included one new trial in this update, bringing the total number of RCTs to six studies with 3611 children. All studies were parallel RCTs assessing the effects of 15 mg/kg of palivizumab every month for up to five months, compared to placebo or no intervention in an outpatient setting, although one study also included hospitalised infants, and another study administered palivizumab intranasally. Most of the included studies were conducted in children with a high risk of severe RSV infection due to comorbidities like bronchopulmonary dysplasia or congenital heart disease.

Synthesis of results: Systemic palivizumab reduces hospitalisation due to RSV infection at two years' follow-up (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.64; I² = 23%; 5 studies, 3343 participants; high-certainty evidence). Based on 98 hospitalisations per 1000 participants in the placebo group, this corresponds to 43 (29 to 62) per 1000 participants in the palivizumab group. Intranasal palivizumab may increase hospitalisation due to RSV infection compared to placebo or no intervention at two years' follow-up (RR 2.33, 95% CI 0.64 to 8.48; 1 study, 94 participants; low-certainty evidence due to serious concerns about imprecision). Based on 64 hospitalisations per 1000 participants in the placebo group, this corresponds to 149 (41 to 541) per 1000 participants in the palivizumab group. Palivizumab probably results in little to no difference in mortality at two years' follow-up (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.15; I² = 0%; 5 studies, 3343 participants; moderate-certainty evidence due to concerns about imprecision). Based on 23 deaths per 1000 participants in the placebo group, this corresponds to 16 (10 to 27) per 1000 participants in the palivizumab group. Palivizumab probably results in little to no difference in adverse events at 150 days' follow-up (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.38; I² = 0%; 4 studies, 3099 participants; moderate-certainty evidence due to concerns about imprecision). Based on 78 cases per 1000 participants in the placebo group, this corresponds to 84 (66 to 107) per 1000 participants in the palivizumab group. Palivizumab probably results in a slight reduction in hospitalisation due to respiratory-related illness at two years' follow-up (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.99; I² = 41%; 6 studies, 3437 participants; moderate-certainty evidence due to concerns about imprecision). Systemic palivizumab may result in a large reduction in RSV infection at two years' follow-up (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.55; I² = 0%; 3 studies, 554 participants; low-certainty evidence due to serious concerns about imprecision). Intranasal palivizumab may increase RSV infection compared to placebo or no intervention at two years' follow-up (RR 1.64, 95% CI 0.87 to 3.08; 1 study, 94 participants; low-certainty evidence due to serious concerns about imprecision). Systemic palivizumab also reduces the number of wheezing days at one-year follow-up (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.44; 1 study, 429 participants; high-certainty evidence). Intranasal palivizumab may result in little to no difference in the mean fraction of wheezing days (mean fraction of wheezing days of 0.94, 95% CI -1.9 to 3.5; 1 study, 93 participants; low-certainty evidence). The risk of bias in outcomes across all studies was similar and predominantly low.

Authors' conclusions: Based on the available evidence, prophylaxis with systemic palivizumab reduces hospitalisation due to RSV infection and probably results in little to no difference in mortality. Intranasal palivizumab may increase hospitalisation due to RSV infection. Palivizumab probably results in little to no difference in adverse events. Moreover, palivizumab probably results in a slight reduction in hospitalisation due to respiratory-related illness. Systemic palivizumab may result in a large reduction in RSV infections, whilst intranasal palivizumab may increase RSV infection. Systemic palivizumab also reduces the number of wheezing days, whilst intranasal palivizumab may result in little to no difference in the mean fraction of wheezing days. These results may be applicable to children with a high risk of severe RSV infection due to comorbidities. Further research is needed to establish the effect of palivizumab in children with other comorbidities known as risk factors for severe RSV disease (e.g. immune deficiencies) and other social determinants of the disease, including children living in low- and middle-income countries, tropical regions, children lacking breastfeeding, living in poverty, or members of families in overcrowded situations.

Funding: This Cochrane review had no dedicated funding.

Registration: Protocol (2020): doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013757 First review version (2021): doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013757.pub2.

帕利珠单抗预防儿童严重呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)感染
理由:呼吸道病毒是婴幼儿下呼吸道感染和住院的主要原因。呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)是该人群的主要感染因子。帕利维珠单抗在第一个RSV季节每月肌注5个月,以预防儿童严重的RSV下呼吸道感染。鉴于其高成本,了解帕利珠单抗是否继续有效预防儿童严重RSV疾病是至关重要的。目的:评价帕利珠单抗预防儿童严重呼吸道合胞病毒感染的效果。检索方法:我们检索了CENTRAL、MEDLINE、Embase、LILACS、CINAHL、Scopus和两个试验注册库,从每个数据库建立到2024年7月,没有语言或出版状态限制。入选标准:我们纳入了0 - 24月龄儿童的随机对照试验(rct)和集群rct,无论性别,无论RSV感染史如何,将帕利珠单抗每月给药15mg /kg(最多5次)与安慰剂、无干预或标准治疗进行比较。结果:关键结果是由于呼吸道合胞病毒感染而住院、全因死亡率和不良事件。重要的结局是因呼吸相关疾病住院、住院时间、RSV感染、喘息天数、补充氧气天数、重症监护病房住院时间和机械通气天数。偏倚风险:我们使用Cochrane的RoB 2工具来评估偏倚风险。综合方法:我们使用随机效应模型进行meta分析,计算二分类结局的风险比(RR)和连续结局的平均差异(MD),两者都有95%的置信区间(CI)。我们使用GRADE来评估每个结果证据的确定性。纳入的研究:我们在本次更新中纳入了一项新的试验,使随机对照试验的总数达到6项研究,涉及3611名儿童。所有研究都是平行随机对照试验,评估每月15mg /kg帕利珠单抗长达5个月的效果,与安慰剂或不干预的门诊环境相比,尽管一项研究还包括住院婴儿,另一项研究给予帕利珠单抗鼻内。大多数纳入的研究都是在患有支气管肺发育不良或先天性心脏病等合并症的严重呼吸道合胞病毒感染高风险儿童中进行的。综合结果:在两年的随访中,全身帕里珠单抗减少了因RSV感染而住院的人数(RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.30至0.64;I²= 23%;5项研究,3343名受试者;高确定性的证据)。基于安慰剂组每1000名参与者中有98人住院,这相当于帕利珠单抗组每1000名参与者中有43人(29至62人)住院。在两年的随访中,与安慰剂或无干预相比,鼻内帕利珠单抗可能增加RSV感染的住院率(RR 2.33, 95% CI 0.64至8.48;1项研究,94名参与者;低确定性证据(由于严重担心不精确)。基于安慰剂组每1000名参与者64例住院,这相当于帕利珠单抗组每1000名参与者149例(41至541例)。在两年的随访中,帕利珠单抗可能导致死亡率几乎没有差异(RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.42至1.15;I²= 0%;5项研究,3343名受试者;中等确定性的证据(由于担心不精确)。基于安慰剂组每1000名参与者中有23人死亡,这相当于帕利珠单抗组每1000名参与者中有16人(10至27人)死亡。在150天的随访中,帕利珠单抗可能导致不良事件几乎没有差异(RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.85至1.38;I²= 0%;4项研究,3099名受试者;中等确定性的证据(由于担心不精确)。基于安慰剂组每1000名参与者中有78例,这相当于帕利珠单抗组每1000名参与者中有84例(66至107例)。在两年的随访中,帕利珠单抗可能导致因呼吸相关疾病住院的轻微减少(RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.65至0.99;I²= 41%;6项研究,3437名受试者;中等确定性的证据(由于担心不精确)。在两年的随访中,全身帕利珠单抗可能导致RSV感染的大幅减少(RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.20至0.55;I²= 0%;3项研究,554名参与者;低确定性证据(由于严重担心不精确)。在两年随访中,与安慰剂或无干预相比,鼻内帕利珠单抗可能增加RSV感染(RR 1.64, 95% CI 0.87至3.08;1项研究,94名参与者;低确定性证据(由于严重担心不精确)。在一年的随访中,全身性帕利珠单抗也减少了喘息天数(RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.35 ~ 0.44;1项研究,429名参与者;高确定性的证据)。鼻内帕利珠单抗可能导致喘息天数的平均分数几乎没有差异(喘息天数的平均分数为0。 94, 95% CI -1.9 ~ 3.5;1项研究,93名参与者;确定性的证据)。所有研究结果的偏倚风险相似,且明显较低。作者的结论是:根据现有证据,全身性帕利珠单抗预防可减少因呼吸道合胞病毒感染引起的住院治疗,并可能导致死亡率几乎没有差异。鼻用帕利珠单抗可能增加呼吸道合胞病毒感染的住院率。帕利维珠单抗可能导致不良事件几乎没有差异。此外,帕利珠单抗可能导致因呼吸相关疾病而住院的轻微减少。全身帕利珠单抗可能导致RSV感染的大幅减少,而鼻用帕利珠单抗可能增加RSV感染。全身帕利珠单抗也减少喘息天数,而鼻内帕利珠单抗可能导致喘息天数的平均分数几乎没有差异。这些结果可能适用于因合并症而有严重呼吸道合胞病毒感染高风险的儿童。需要进一步的研究来确定帕利珠单抗对患有其他合并症的儿童的影响,这些合并症被称为严重RSV疾病的危险因素(例如免疫缺陷)和该疾病的其他社会决定因素,包括生活在低收入和中等收入国家、热带地区的儿童、缺乏母乳喂养的儿童、生活贫困的儿童或过度拥挤的家庭成员。资金来源:Cochrane综述没有专门的资金来源。注册:协议(2020):doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013757第一次审查版本(2021):doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013757.pub2。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
173
审稿时长
1-2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) stands as the premier database for systematic reviews in healthcare. It comprises Cochrane Reviews, along with protocols for these reviews, editorials, and supplements. Owned and operated by Cochrane, a worldwide independent network of healthcare stakeholders, the CDSR (ISSN 1469-493X) encompasses a broad spectrum of health-related topics, including health services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信