Patients with cystic fibrosis do not have an increased risk of adverse events after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a propensity-matched analysis.
Mahmoud Y Madi, Saqr Alsakarneh, Yassine Kilani, Ryan Plunkett, Razan Aburumman, Farah Heis, Christopher Nguyen, Christine Hachem, Wissam Kiwan
{"title":"Patients with cystic fibrosis do not have an increased risk of adverse events after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a propensity-matched analysis.","authors":"Mahmoud Y Madi, Saqr Alsakarneh, Yassine Kilani, Ryan Plunkett, Razan Aburumman, Farah Heis, Christopher Nguyen, Christine Hachem, Wissam Kiwan","doi":"10.20524/aog.2025.0983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a common life-limiting genetic disease often associated with hepatobiliary complications. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), though valuable, carries procedural risks. We assessed the safety of ERCP in CF patients using real-world data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX database (2010-2024) identified adults (≥18 years) with CF who underwent ERCP. Propensity-score matching adjusted for confounders, including age, sex, race, and hospitalization history. The primary outcome was post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP); secondary outcomes included bleeding and infection. Subgroup analysis evaluated outcomes in patients with choledocholithiasis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 534 matched CF patients (mean age 44.6 years; 48.3% female), rates of PEP (8.3% vs. 4.9%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.937-3.315; P=0.075), bleeding (3.1% vs. 2.1%, aOR 1.52, 95%CI 0.674-3.409; P=0.31), and infection (3.7% vs. 2.4%, aOR 1.55, 95%CI 0.638-3.785; P=0.33) were not significantly different compared to non-CF controls. Subgroup analysis of choledocholithiasis patients similarly showed no significant differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ERCP in CF patients demonstrated comparable adverse event rates to non-CF controls. These findings support the procedural safety of ERCP in this population, though further prospective studies are needed to validate these results and clarify risk by indication.</p>","PeriodicalId":7978,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterology","volume":"38 4","pages":"446-452"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12277522/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20524/aog.2025.0983","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a common life-limiting genetic disease often associated with hepatobiliary complications. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), though valuable, carries procedural risks. We assessed the safety of ERCP in CF patients using real-world data.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX database (2010-2024) identified adults (≥18 years) with CF who underwent ERCP. Propensity-score matching adjusted for confounders, including age, sex, race, and hospitalization history. The primary outcome was post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP); secondary outcomes included bleeding and infection. Subgroup analysis evaluated outcomes in patients with choledocholithiasis.
Results: Among 534 matched CF patients (mean age 44.6 years; 48.3% female), rates of PEP (8.3% vs. 4.9%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.937-3.315; P=0.075), bleeding (3.1% vs. 2.1%, aOR 1.52, 95%CI 0.674-3.409; P=0.31), and infection (3.7% vs. 2.4%, aOR 1.55, 95%CI 0.638-3.785; P=0.33) were not significantly different compared to non-CF controls. Subgroup analysis of choledocholithiasis patients similarly showed no significant differences.
Conclusions: ERCP in CF patients demonstrated comparable adverse event rates to non-CF controls. These findings support the procedural safety of ERCP in this population, though further prospective studies are needed to validate these results and clarify risk by indication.