Characteristics of early- versus late-onset esophageal adenocarcinoma: insights from the National Inpatient Sample 2016-2020.

IF 2.2 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Annals of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-25 DOI:10.20524/aog.2025.0976
Sana Rabeeah, Ahmad Mahdi, Vikash Kumar, Jayalekshmi Jayakumar, Bisher Sawaf, Shahem Abbarh, Ali Wakil, Hasan Al-Obaidi, Ahmed El Rahyel, Muhammed Elhadi, Yaseen Alastal
{"title":"Characteristics of early- versus late-onset esophageal adenocarcinoma: insights from the National Inpatient Sample 2016-2020.","authors":"Sana Rabeeah, Ahmad Mahdi, Vikash Kumar, Jayalekshmi Jayakumar, Bisher Sawaf, Shahem Abbarh, Ali Wakil, Hasan Al-Obaidi, Ahmed El Rahyel, Muhammed Elhadi, Yaseen Alastal","doi":"10.20524/aog.2025.0976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The incidence of early-onset esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) in adults aged <50 years is rising, yet remains under-investigated. This study compared demographic, clinical and socioeconomic predictors of early- vs. late-onset EAC using national hospitalization data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed adult patients diagnosed with EAC from the National Inpatient Sample (2016-2020). Cases were stratified into early-onset (age <50 years) and late-onset (≥50 years), and further categorized by tumor location (upper, middle, lower esophagus). ICD-10-CM codes were used to identify diagnoses. Demographics, comorbidities and socioeconomic variables were compared using Rao-Scott chi-square tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 105,228 EAC admissions, early-onset cases comprised 5.89%. Lower esophagus involvement was most common (74.6%). Compared to late-onset patients, early-onset cases had a lower proportion of Caucasians (71.5% vs. 79.8%, P<0.001) and higher proportions of Black (13.9% vs. 9.6%) and Hispanic individuals (7.0% vs. 5.4%). Smoking (25.1% vs. 17.9%), obesity (11.4% vs. 8.4%), and drug use (28.9% vs. 19.7%) were more prevalent in early-onset patients (P<0.001). In contrast, late-onset patients had higher rates of hypertension (47.1% vs. 26.7%), diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and gastroesophageal reflex disease (P<0.001). Early-onset patients were less likely to be insured with Medicare (6.8% vs. 57.9%), and more likely with Medicaid (35.0% vs. 10.6%) or to be self-payers (3.9% vs. 1.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Early-onset EAC presents with distinct racial, socioeconomic and clinical profiles compared to late-onset disease. These findings underscore the need for tailored screening strategies and further research to address disparities and risk factors in younger populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":7978,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterology","volume":"38 4","pages":"392-400"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12277520/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20524/aog.2025.0976","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The incidence of early-onset esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) in adults aged <50 years is rising, yet remains under-investigated. This study compared demographic, clinical and socioeconomic predictors of early- vs. late-onset EAC using national hospitalization data.

Methods: We analyzed adult patients diagnosed with EAC from the National Inpatient Sample (2016-2020). Cases were stratified into early-onset (age <50 years) and late-onset (≥50 years), and further categorized by tumor location (upper, middle, lower esophagus). ICD-10-CM codes were used to identify diagnoses. Demographics, comorbidities and socioeconomic variables were compared using Rao-Scott chi-square tests.

Results: Among 105,228 EAC admissions, early-onset cases comprised 5.89%. Lower esophagus involvement was most common (74.6%). Compared to late-onset patients, early-onset cases had a lower proportion of Caucasians (71.5% vs. 79.8%, P<0.001) and higher proportions of Black (13.9% vs. 9.6%) and Hispanic individuals (7.0% vs. 5.4%). Smoking (25.1% vs. 17.9%), obesity (11.4% vs. 8.4%), and drug use (28.9% vs. 19.7%) were more prevalent in early-onset patients (P<0.001). In contrast, late-onset patients had higher rates of hypertension (47.1% vs. 26.7%), diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and gastroesophageal reflex disease (P<0.001). Early-onset patients were less likely to be insured with Medicare (6.8% vs. 57.9%), and more likely with Medicaid (35.0% vs. 10.6%) or to be self-payers (3.9% vs. 1.8%).

Conclusions: Early-onset EAC presents with distinct racial, socioeconomic and clinical profiles compared to late-onset disease. These findings underscore the need for tailored screening strategies and further research to address disparities and risk factors in younger populations.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

早发性与晚发性食管癌的特征:2016-2020年全国住院患者样本的见解
背景:老年成人早发性食管腺癌(EAC)的发病率研究方法:我们分析了2016-2020年全国住院患者样本中诊断为EAC的成年患者。结果:105228例EAC入院患者中,早发病例占5.89%。下食道受累最常见(74.6%)。与晚发性患者相比,早发性EAC患者中白种人的比例较低(71.5% vs. 79.8%)。结论:与晚发性疾病相比,早发性EAC具有明显的种族、社会经济和临床特征。这些发现强调需要制定量身定制的筛查策略和进一步研究,以解决年轻人群中的差异和风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Gastroenterology
Annals of Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信