Predominant serrated molecular signature in postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 8 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Jen-Hao Yeh, Sin-Hua Moi, Chia-Chi Chen, Chao-Wen Hsu, Wen-Shuo Yeh, Tzu-Ning Tseng, Chuan-Pin Lin, Yu-Peng Liu, Jaw-Yuan Wang
{"title":"Predominant serrated molecular signature in postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Jen-Hao Yeh, Sin-Hua Moi, Chia-Chi Chen, Chao-Wen Hsu, Wen-Shuo Yeh, Tzu-Ning Tseng, Chuan-Pin Lin, Yu-Peng Liu, Jaw-Yuan Wang","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers (PCCRCs) are an adverse outcome associated with missed lesions and incomplete polypectomy. However, their molecular features have not been systematically reviewed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to April 2024. Studies examining the molecular characteristics of PCCRCs, including microsatellite instability (MSI), CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP), genetic mutations, and chromosomal alterations were regarded as eligible.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 15 studies encompassing 11 cohorts, with 2,143 PCCRC and 19,036 sporadic colorectal cancer (SCRC) cases, were analyzed. Compared with SCRC, PCCRC was associated with older age (standardized mean difference 0.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20-0.38) and more proximal lesions (odds ratio [OR] 2.08, 95% CI 1.91-3.63). Molecularly, PCCRCs were more likely to exhibit MSI (OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.69-3.08), CIMP (OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.39-3.18), and BRAF mutations (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.22-2.49) but were less likely to exhibit KRAS mutations (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.45-0.87). Furthermore, MSI was strongly correlated with BRAF mutation (OR 9.36, 95% CI 5.11-17.16) and proximal lesions (OR 6.16, 95% CI 3.74-10.16) in a pooled analysis. Although the pooled 5-year overall survival rate was similar between PCCRC and SCRC cases (hazard ratio 1.03, 95% CI 0.64-1.66), PCCRCs exhibited worse survival compared with screening-detected ones (hazard ratio 1.65, 95% CI 1.46-1.86).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clinical and molecular features indicate that PCCRCs are more likely to be associated with the serrated pathway than with SCRC. Enhancing the detection of clinically significant serrated lesions may improve the efficacy of CRC screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":7608,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003658","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers (PCCRCs) are an adverse outcome associated with missed lesions and incomplete polypectomy. However, their molecular features have not been systematically reviewed.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to April 2024. Studies examining the molecular characteristics of PCCRCs, including microsatellite instability (MSI), CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP), genetic mutations, and chromosomal alterations were regarded as eligible.

Results: In total, 15 studies encompassing 11 cohorts, with 2,143 PCCRC and 19,036 sporadic colorectal cancer (SCRC) cases, were analyzed. Compared with SCRC, PCCRC was associated with older age (standardized mean difference 0.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20-0.38) and more proximal lesions (odds ratio [OR] 2.08, 95% CI 1.91-3.63). Molecularly, PCCRCs were more likely to exhibit MSI (OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.69-3.08), CIMP (OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.39-3.18), and BRAF mutations (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.22-2.49) but were less likely to exhibit KRAS mutations (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.45-0.87). Furthermore, MSI was strongly correlated with BRAF mutation (OR 9.36, 95% CI 5.11-17.16) and proximal lesions (OR 6.16, 95% CI 3.74-10.16) in a pooled analysis. Although the pooled 5-year overall survival rate was similar between PCCRC and SCRC cases (hazard ratio 1.03, 95% CI 0.64-1.66), PCCRCs exhibited worse survival compared with screening-detected ones (hazard ratio 1.65, 95% CI 1.46-1.86).

Conclusion: Clinical and molecular features indicate that PCCRCs are more likely to be associated with the serrated pathway than with SCRC. Enhancing the detection of clinically significant serrated lesions may improve the efficacy of CRC screening.

结肠镜检查后结直肠癌的主要锯齿状分子特征:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
结肠镜检查后结直肠癌(PCCRCs)是一种与遗漏病变和不完全息肉切除术相关的不良结果。然而,它们的分子特征尚未得到系统的评述。方法:检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆数据库,检索时间从成立到2024年4月。研究PCCRCs的分子特征,包括微卫星不稳定性(MSI)、CpG岛甲基化表型(CIMP)、基因突变和染色体改变被认为是合格的。结果:共分析了15项研究,包括11个队列,2143例PCCRC和19036例散发性结直肠癌(SCRC)病例。与SCRC相比,PCCRC与年龄较大(标准化平均差0.29,95%可信区间[CI] 0.20-0.38)和近端病变较多相关(优势比[OR] 2.08, 95% CI 1.91-3.63)。从分子上看,pccrc更容易表现出MSI (OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.69-3.08)、CIMP (OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.39-3.18)和BRAF突变(OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.22-2.49),但较少表现出KRAS突变(OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.45-0.87)。此外,在合并分析中,MSI与BRAF突变(OR 9.36, 95% CI 5.11-17.16)和近端病变(OR 6.16, 95% CI 3.74-10.16)密切相关。尽管PCCRC和SCRC病例的5年总生存率相似(风险比1.03,95% CI 0.64-1.66),但PCCRC患者的生存率较筛查检测患者差(风险比1.65,95% CI 1.46-1.86)。结论:临床和分子特征表明pccrc更可能与锯齿状通路相关,而不是与SCRC相关。加强对具有临床意义的锯齿状病变的检测,可以提高CRC筛查的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Gastroenterology
American Journal of Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
458
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), The American Journal of Gastroenterology (AJG) stands as the foremost clinical journal in the fields of gastroenterology and hepatology. AJG offers practical and professional support to clinicians addressing the most prevalent gastroenterological disorders in patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信