Longitudinal Associations between Changes in Inter-Ankle SBP Difference and Cardiovascular Events and Mortality in the ARIC Study.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Daniela Charry, Jing Xu, Michelle L Meyer, Anna Kucharska-Newton, Kunihiro Matsushita, Kenneth R Butler, Timothy M Hughes, Hirofumi Tanaka
{"title":"Longitudinal Associations between Changes in Inter-Ankle SBP Difference and Cardiovascular Events and Mortality in the ARIC Study.","authors":"Daniela Charry, Jing Xu, Michelle L Meyer, Anna Kucharska-Newton, Kunihiro Matsushita, Kenneth R Butler, Timothy M Hughes, Hirofumi Tanaka","doi":"10.1093/ajh/hpaf133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Large inter-ankle systolic blood pressure (IASBP) differences (≥10 or ≥15 mmHg) have been linked to cardiovascular events and mortality. This longitudinal study evaluated the association of changes in IASBP differences with incident cardiovascular events and mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study, bilateral ankle blood pressure was measured at Visit 5 and at Visit 6/7 (n = 2051; mean age 73.7 ± 4.3 years). Participants were categorized into four groups by IASBP differences: small at both visits (<10 mmHg); decreasing (≥10 mmHg at Visit 5 but <10 mmHg in Visit 6/7); increasing (<10 mmHg at Visit 5 but ≥10 mmHg in Visit 6/7); and large at both visits (≥10 mmHg). Categories were repeated using a ≥15 mmHg cutoff value. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In adjusted analyses, individuals with increasing differences (≥10 mmHg) had higher risks of heart failure (HR: 1.31; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 1.00-1.76) and stroke (HR: 1.57; 95% CI, 1.16-2.11), compared to those with small differences at both visits. Similarly, those with persistently large differences showed elevated risks of coronary heart disease (HR: 2.25; 95% CI, 1.46-3.47) and stroke (HR: 1.68; 95% CI, 1.17-2.41). Analyses using a ≥15 mmHg cutoff value demonstrated even stronger associations with all three cardiovascular events. No significant associations were observed with all-cause or cardiovascular mortality for these categories.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Increasing and persistently large IASBP differences are associated with elevated risk of incident cardiovascular events. Monitoring IASBP differences may help identify individuals at higher risk for adverse outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7578,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hypertension","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajh/hpaf133","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Large inter-ankle systolic blood pressure (IASBP) differences (≥10 or ≥15 mmHg) have been linked to cardiovascular events and mortality. This longitudinal study evaluated the association of changes in IASBP differences with incident cardiovascular events and mortality.

Methods: In the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study, bilateral ankle blood pressure was measured at Visit 5 and at Visit 6/7 (n = 2051; mean age 73.7 ± 4.3 years). Participants were categorized into four groups by IASBP differences: small at both visits (<10 mmHg); decreasing (≥10 mmHg at Visit 5 but <10 mmHg in Visit 6/7); increasing (<10 mmHg at Visit 5 but ≥10 mmHg in Visit 6/7); and large at both visits (≥10 mmHg). Categories were repeated using a ≥15 mmHg cutoff value. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs).

Results: In adjusted analyses, individuals with increasing differences (≥10 mmHg) had higher risks of heart failure (HR: 1.31; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 1.00-1.76) and stroke (HR: 1.57; 95% CI, 1.16-2.11), compared to those with small differences at both visits. Similarly, those with persistently large differences showed elevated risks of coronary heart disease (HR: 2.25; 95% CI, 1.46-3.47) and stroke (HR: 1.68; 95% CI, 1.17-2.41). Analyses using a ≥15 mmHg cutoff value demonstrated even stronger associations with all three cardiovascular events. No significant associations were observed with all-cause or cardiovascular mortality for these categories.

Conclusions: Increasing and persistently large IASBP differences are associated with elevated risk of incident cardiovascular events. Monitoring IASBP differences may help identify individuals at higher risk for adverse outcomes.

ARIC研究中踝关节间收缩压差变化与心血管事件和死亡率的纵向关联。
背景:踝关节间收缩压(IASBP)差异大(≥10或≥15 mmHg)与心血管事件和死亡率有关。这项纵向研究评估了IASBP差异变化与心血管事件和死亡率的关系。方法:在社区动脉粥样硬化风险研究中,在第5次就诊和第6/7次就诊时测量双侧踝关节血压(n = 2051;平均年龄73.7±4.3岁)。根据IASBP差异将参与者分为四组:两次就诊时均较小(结果:在调整分析中,差异增大(≥10 mmHg)的个体心力衰竭风险较高(HR: 1.31;95%可信区间[CI], 1.00-1.76)和卒中(HR: 1.57;95% CI, 1.16-2.11),与两次就诊时差异较小的患者相比。同样,那些持续存在较大差异的人患冠心病的风险升高(HR: 2.25;95% CI, 1.46-3.47)和卒中(HR: 1.68;95% ci, 1.17-2.41)。使用≥15 mmHg临界值的分析显示,与所有三种心血管事件的相关性更强。未观察到这些类别与全因死亡率或心血管死亡率有显著相关性。结论:IASBP差异的增加和持续较大与心血管事件发生风险升高相关。监测IASBP差异可能有助于识别不良后果风险较高的个体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Hypertension
American Journal of Hypertension 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
144
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Hypertension is a monthly, peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for scientific inquiry of the highest standards in the field of hypertension and related cardiovascular disease. The journal publishes high-quality original research and review articles on basic sciences, molecular biology, clinical and experimental hypertension, cardiology, epidemiology, pediatric hypertension, endocrinology, neurophysiology, and nephrology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信