Ramucirumab-containing chemotherapy for patients with gastrointestinal neuroendocrine carcinoma refractory/intolerant to platinum-based chemotherapy: A multicenter observational retrospective study (WJOG13420G).
{"title":"Ramucirumab-containing chemotherapy for patients with gastrointestinal neuroendocrine carcinoma refractory/intolerant to platinum-based chemotherapy: A multicenter observational retrospective study (WJOG13420G).","authors":"Yuki Matsubara, Toshiki Masuishi, Waki Hosoda, Hidekazu Hirano, Saori Mishima, Hiroyuki Takahashi, Tomoyuki Otsuka, Kenta Kawasaki, Takeshi Kawakami, Kazuhiro Yanagihara, Takaya Shimura, Masato Komoda, Kozue Murayama, Keiko Minashi, Yoshiyuki Yamamoto, Yudai Shinohara, Shinichi Nishina, Nobuyuki Musha, Kyoko Kato, Kentaro Kawakami, Katsunori Shinozaki, Kenji Tsuchihashi, Takayuki Ando, Yosuke Kito, Akitaka Makiyama, Seiichiro Mitani, Kaori Hino, Naoki Izawa, Isao Oze, Kei Muro","doi":"10.1002/ijc.70053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>No standard second-line chemotherapy has been established for gastrointestinal neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC). This study aimed to determine whether ramucirumab (RAM) is a treatment candidate in this setting. We retrospectively collected data from patients with gastric and colorectal NEC who received second-line chemotherapy following platinum-based chemotherapy. The pathological diagnosis of NEC was confirmed centrally according to the World Health Organization 2019 classification. We compared the clinical outcomes between second- or later-line chemotherapy in the RAM group and second-line chemotherapy in the non-RAM group. One-hundred patients diagnosed with NEC by central pathological review were studied. The RAM and non-RAM groups included 44 (gastric/colorectal cancer, 34/10) and 56 (37/19) patients, respectively. In the RAM group, 68% of patients received RAM as second-line chemotherapy. RAM was most frequently combined with weekly paclitaxel for gastric NEC and FOLFIRI for colorectal NEC. The RAM group showed better trends in overall survival and progression-free survival than the non-RAM group, with a median of 9.0 versus 5.6 months and 4.3 versus 1.8 months, respectively (hazard ratios [HR]: 0.75 [95% CI: 0.45-1.28] and 0.45 [0.27-0.75]). Efficacy was more pronounced in gastric NEC (PFS HR: 0.32, OS HR: 0.56) compared to colorectal NEC (PFS HR: 0.82, OS HR: 1.47). The objective response rate was significantly higher in the RAM group (44%) than in the non-RAM group (6%), with notably higher responses observed in patients receiving paclitaxel plus RAM (62%). This study suggested that RAM-containing chemotherapy, especially paclitaxel plus RAM for gastric NEC, seems promising and should be further investigated.</p>","PeriodicalId":180,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.70053","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
No standard second-line chemotherapy has been established for gastrointestinal neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC). This study aimed to determine whether ramucirumab (RAM) is a treatment candidate in this setting. We retrospectively collected data from patients with gastric and colorectal NEC who received second-line chemotherapy following platinum-based chemotherapy. The pathological diagnosis of NEC was confirmed centrally according to the World Health Organization 2019 classification. We compared the clinical outcomes between second- or later-line chemotherapy in the RAM group and second-line chemotherapy in the non-RAM group. One-hundred patients diagnosed with NEC by central pathological review were studied. The RAM and non-RAM groups included 44 (gastric/colorectal cancer, 34/10) and 56 (37/19) patients, respectively. In the RAM group, 68% of patients received RAM as second-line chemotherapy. RAM was most frequently combined with weekly paclitaxel for gastric NEC and FOLFIRI for colorectal NEC. The RAM group showed better trends in overall survival and progression-free survival than the non-RAM group, with a median of 9.0 versus 5.6 months and 4.3 versus 1.8 months, respectively (hazard ratios [HR]: 0.75 [95% CI: 0.45-1.28] and 0.45 [0.27-0.75]). Efficacy was more pronounced in gastric NEC (PFS HR: 0.32, OS HR: 0.56) compared to colorectal NEC (PFS HR: 0.82, OS HR: 1.47). The objective response rate was significantly higher in the RAM group (44%) than in the non-RAM group (6%), with notably higher responses observed in patients receiving paclitaxel plus RAM (62%). This study suggested that RAM-containing chemotherapy, especially paclitaxel plus RAM for gastric NEC, seems promising and should be further investigated.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Cancer (IJC) is the official journal of the Union for International Cancer Control—UICC; it appears twice a month. IJC invites submission of manuscripts under a broad scope of topics relevant to experimental and clinical cancer research and publishes original Research Articles and Short Reports under the following categories:
-Cancer Epidemiology-
Cancer Genetics and Epigenetics-
Infectious Causes of Cancer-
Innovative Tools and Methods-
Molecular Cancer Biology-
Tumor Immunology and Microenvironment-
Tumor Markers and Signatures-
Cancer Therapy and Prevention