Aline Meyer Oliveira, Marius Floriancic, Fernanda Moreira Gianasi, Barbara Herbstritt, Patricia Vieira Pompeu, Felipe de Carvalho Araújo, André Maciel Silva-Sene, Miguel Gama Reis, Camila Laís Farrapo, Leony Aparecido Silva Ferreira, Rubens Manoel dos Santos, Ilja van Meerveld
{"title":"Isotopic Composition of Soil and Xylem Water Across Six Seasonal Floodplain Forests in Southeastern Brazil","authors":"Aline Meyer Oliveira, Marius Floriancic, Fernanda Moreira Gianasi, Barbara Herbstritt, Patricia Vieira Pompeu, Felipe de Carvalho Araújo, André Maciel Silva-Sene, Miguel Gama Reis, Camila Laís Farrapo, Leony Aparecido Silva Ferreira, Rubens Manoel dos Santos, Ilja van Meerveld","doi":"10.1002/eco.70076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Seasonal floodplain forests are unique but threatened ecosystems. Trees in these ecosystems have adapted to extreme conditions of excess water and drought. However, what water sources these trees use is not fully known and therefore the vulnerability of floodplain forests to changes in the hydrological cycle remains poorly understood. In this study, we sampled different water sources (precipitation, streamflow, groundwater, soil water at different depths) and vegetation across six floodplain forests in the Rio Grande and São Francisco basins in southeastern Brazil during four campaigns (two dry and two wet seasons). We used water stable isotope data to investigate the sources for root water uptake. There was no consistent dry-to-wet season variation in the isotopic composition of soil water, but soil water reflected the isotopic signature of the wet season’s precipitation and overbank flow. There was a very large variability in the isotopic composition of xylem water, but no consistent pattern across the floodplains, or between tree species. Mixing model analyses suggest that for the floodplains in the Rio Grande basin, soil water was the main source of root water uptake during the wet season (64% ± 17) but not during the dry season (43% ± 17), when streamflow and groundwater were the main sources. In the São Francisco basin, soil water was the main source of root water uptake (60% ± 17 and 72% ± 15 for the wet and dry seasons, respectively). However, the uncertainties are large due to the similarity in the isotopic composition of potential water sources.</p>","PeriodicalId":55169,"journal":{"name":"Ecohydrology","volume":"18 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eco.70076","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecohydrology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eco.70076","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Seasonal floodplain forests are unique but threatened ecosystems. Trees in these ecosystems have adapted to extreme conditions of excess water and drought. However, what water sources these trees use is not fully known and therefore the vulnerability of floodplain forests to changes in the hydrological cycle remains poorly understood. In this study, we sampled different water sources (precipitation, streamflow, groundwater, soil water at different depths) and vegetation across six floodplain forests in the Rio Grande and São Francisco basins in southeastern Brazil during four campaigns (two dry and two wet seasons). We used water stable isotope data to investigate the sources for root water uptake. There was no consistent dry-to-wet season variation in the isotopic composition of soil water, but soil water reflected the isotopic signature of the wet season’s precipitation and overbank flow. There was a very large variability in the isotopic composition of xylem water, but no consistent pattern across the floodplains, or between tree species. Mixing model analyses suggest that for the floodplains in the Rio Grande basin, soil water was the main source of root water uptake during the wet season (64% ± 17) but not during the dry season (43% ± 17), when streamflow and groundwater were the main sources. In the São Francisco basin, soil water was the main source of root water uptake (60% ± 17 and 72% ± 15 for the wet and dry seasons, respectively). However, the uncertainties are large due to the similarity in the isotopic composition of potential water sources.
季节性洪泛区森林是独特但受到威胁的生态系统。这些生态系统中的树木已经适应了缺水和干旱的极端条件。然而,这些树木使用的水源尚不完全清楚,因此对洪泛区森林对水文循环变化的脆弱性仍然知之甚少。在这项研究中,我们在巴西东南部里约热内卢Grande和s o Francisco盆地的六个漫滩森林中采样了不同的水源(降水、河流、地下水、不同深度的土壤水)和植被,并进行了四个运动(两个旱季和两个雨季)。我们利用水稳定同位素数据研究了根系水分吸收的来源。土壤水的同位素组成在干湿季节没有一致的变化,但土壤水反映了雨季降水和河岸径流的同位素特征。木质部水的同位素组成有很大的变化,但在洪泛区之间或树种之间没有一致的模式。混合模型分析表明,在里约热内卢Grande流域洪漫平原,土壤水分是根系吸水的主要来源,在雨季(64%±17),而在旱季(43%±17),径流和地下水是主要来源。在s o Francisco流域,土壤水分是根系吸水的主要来源(湿季为60%±17%,旱季为72%±15%)。然而,由于潜在水源的同位素组成相似,不确定性很大。
期刊介绍:
Ecohydrology is an international journal publishing original scientific and review papers that aim to improve understanding of processes at the interface between ecology and hydrology and associated applications related to environmental management.
Ecohydrology seeks to increase interdisciplinary insights by placing particular emphasis on interactions and associated feedbacks in both space and time between ecological systems and the hydrological cycle. Research contributions are solicited from disciplines focusing on the physical, ecological, biological, biogeochemical, geomorphological, drainage basin, mathematical and methodological aspects of ecohydrology. Research in both terrestrial and aquatic systems is of interest provided it explicitly links ecological systems and the hydrologic cycle; research such as aquatic ecological, channel engineering, or ecological or hydrological modelling is less appropriate for the journal unless it specifically addresses the criteria above. Manuscripts describing individual case studies are of interest in cases where broader insights are discussed beyond site- and species-specific results.