Environmental Impacts of Salmonidae Farming: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis of Life Cycle Assessment Studies

IF 11.3 1区 农林科学 Q1 FISHERIES
Mausam Budhathoki, Sudikshya Phuyal, Sujita Pandey, Marianne Thomsen
{"title":"Environmental Impacts of Salmonidae Farming: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis of Life Cycle Assessment Studies","authors":"Mausam Budhathoki,&nbsp;Sudikshya Phuyal,&nbsp;Sujita Pandey,&nbsp;Marianne Thomsen","doi":"10.1111/raq.70069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Salmonidae farming is a cornerstone of global aquaculture, but growing concerns about its environmental impacts highlight the urgent need for improved understanding and mitigation strategies. To address this, a systematic review of 31 life cycle assessment studies was conducted, with 15 providing sufficient data for in-depth meta-analysis. The global warming potential (GWP) results indicate that Salmonidae farming generates a median of 2570 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq per tonne of live weight, with an interquartile range of 2032–3802 kg, of which approximately 65% is attributed to feed production. Eutrophication potential (EP) was measured at 42.6 g PO<sub>4</sub><sup>3−</sup>-eq/t (range: 23–66), with 24% linked to feed, while acidification potential (AP) was 15.85 g SO<sub>2</sub>-eq/t (range: 10–28), with 68% from feed. Energy demand (ED) was found to be 54,365 MJ/t (range: 32,576–113,000), with 48.6% attributed to feed inputs. The feed conversion ratio significantly influenced GWP, EP, and AP outcomes. Meta-analysis revealed that flow-through systems have a lower GWP (effect size = −0.24) compared to recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS), which showed a notably higher GWP (4.31). While RAS systems significantly reduce EP (−5.11), net-pen systems contribute moderately to EP (0.38). However, differences in GWP and EP between production systems were not statistically significant. Notably, most reviewed LCA studies lacked detailed feed composition data and did not fully quantify nitrogen emissions, limiting the accurate assessment of marine eutrophication impacts. Future research should prioritize improving LCA data quality, optimizing feed efficiency, and developing sustainable farming practices to further reduce its environmental footprint.</p>","PeriodicalId":227,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Aquaculture","volume":"17 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/raq.70069","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Aquaculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/raq.70069","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Salmonidae farming is a cornerstone of global aquaculture, but growing concerns about its environmental impacts highlight the urgent need for improved understanding and mitigation strategies. To address this, a systematic review of 31 life cycle assessment studies was conducted, with 15 providing sufficient data for in-depth meta-analysis. The global warming potential (GWP) results indicate that Salmonidae farming generates a median of 2570 kg CO2-eq per tonne of live weight, with an interquartile range of 2032–3802 kg, of which approximately 65% is attributed to feed production. Eutrophication potential (EP) was measured at 42.6 g PO43−-eq/t (range: 23–66), with 24% linked to feed, while acidification potential (AP) was 15.85 g SO2-eq/t (range: 10–28), with 68% from feed. Energy demand (ED) was found to be 54,365 MJ/t (range: 32,576–113,000), with 48.6% attributed to feed inputs. The feed conversion ratio significantly influenced GWP, EP, and AP outcomes. Meta-analysis revealed that flow-through systems have a lower GWP (effect size = −0.24) compared to recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS), which showed a notably higher GWP (4.31). While RAS systems significantly reduce EP (−5.11), net-pen systems contribute moderately to EP (0.38). However, differences in GWP and EP between production systems were not statistically significant. Notably, most reviewed LCA studies lacked detailed feed composition data and did not fully quantify nitrogen emissions, limiting the accurate assessment of marine eutrophication impacts. Future research should prioritize improving LCA data quality, optimizing feed efficiency, and developing sustainable farming practices to further reduce its environmental footprint.

Abstract Image

鲑科养殖业对环境的影响:生命周期评估研究的系统回顾和Meta分析
沙门氏菌养殖是全球水产养殖的基石,但对其环境影响的日益关注凸显了迫切需要提高认识和缓解战略。为了解决这个问题,我们对31项生命周期评估研究进行了系统回顾,其中15项研究提供了足够的数据进行深入的荟萃分析。全球变暖潜势(GWP)结果表明,鲑科养殖业每吨活重产生的co2当量中位数为2570千克,四分位数范围为2032-3802千克,其中约65%归因于饲料生产。富营养化电位(EP)为42.6 g PO43−当量/t(范围:23-66),其中24%与饲料有关;酸化电位(AP)为15.85 g so2−当量/t(范围:10-28),其中68%来自饲料。能源需求(ED)为54,365 MJ/t(范围:32,576-113,000),其中48.6%归因于饲料投入。饲料转化率显著影响GWP、EP和AP的结果。meta分析显示,与循环水养殖系统(RAS)相比,通流养殖系统的GWP值较低(效应值= - 0.24),而循环水养殖系统的GWP值明显较高(4.31)。RAS系统显著降低EP (- 5.11), net-pen系统对EP的贡献中等(0.38)。然而,不同生产系统间的GWP和EP差异无统计学意义。值得注意的是,大多数已审查的LCA研究缺乏详细的饲料组成数据,没有充分量化氮排放,限制了对海洋富营养化影响的准确评估。未来的研究应优先考虑提高LCA数据质量、优化饲料效率和发展可持续的耕作方式,以进一步减少其环境足迹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
24.80
自引率
5.80%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Reviews in Aquaculture is a journal that aims to provide a platform for reviews on various aspects of aquaculture science, techniques, policies, and planning. The journal publishes fully peer-reviewed review articles on topics including global, regional, and national production and market trends in aquaculture, advancements in aquaculture practices and technology, interactions between aquaculture and the environment, indigenous and alien species in aquaculture, genetics and its relation to aquaculture, as well as aquaculture product quality and traceability. The journal is indexed and abstracted in several databases including AgBiotech News & Information (CABI), AgBiotechNet, Agricultural Engineering Abstracts, Environment Index (EBSCO Publishing), SCOPUS (Elsevier), and Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics) among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信