‘I Love Being My Own Boss (But the Work is Killing Me)’: Ride-hail Drivers’ Contradictory Ideas about Work in African Cities

IF 3.2 2区 社会学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Matteo Rizzo
{"title":"‘I Love Being My Own Boss (But the Work is Killing Me)’: Ride-hail Drivers’ Contradictory Ideas about Work in African Cities","authors":"Matteo Rizzo","doi":"10.1111/dech.70003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As digital employment becomes increasingly significant, a number of legal cases have emerged centred on whether digital workers should be classified as independent partners or employees. Workers’ freedom in choosing whether and how long to work for an app is central to the argument by platform firms that they are mere technology providers to independent partners. Conversely, the tight control exercised by apps is emphasized by those who see ride-hail work as unprotected wage work. Drawing on mixed-methods research in Dar es Salaam, Johannesburg and Nairobi, this article contributes to the literature by analysing the paradoxical perceptions about work by ride-hail drivers who operate under tight control from apps and yet often think of themselves as their own boss. The manuscript reviews the literature which explains this paradox as the result of the apps’ successful ideological control over work, which is hegemonic and is internalized by drivers, inducing them to consent. The article then discusses the value and limitations of this explanation. It argues that a stronger focus on drivers’ employment histories, and on the often-unexplored dynamics of drivers’ internal class stratification, are essential to understanding why some drivers consider themselves to be their own boss, whilst others do not.</p>","PeriodicalId":48194,"journal":{"name":"Development and Change","volume":"56 3","pages":"484-509"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dech.70003","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development and Change","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dech.70003","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As digital employment becomes increasingly significant, a number of legal cases have emerged centred on whether digital workers should be classified as independent partners or employees. Workers’ freedom in choosing whether and how long to work for an app is central to the argument by platform firms that they are mere technology providers to independent partners. Conversely, the tight control exercised by apps is emphasized by those who see ride-hail work as unprotected wage work. Drawing on mixed-methods research in Dar es Salaam, Johannesburg and Nairobi, this article contributes to the literature by analysing the paradoxical perceptions about work by ride-hail drivers who operate under tight control from apps and yet often think of themselves as their own boss. The manuscript reviews the literature which explains this paradox as the result of the apps’ successful ideological control over work, which is hegemonic and is internalized by drivers, inducing them to consent. The article then discusses the value and limitations of this explanation. It argues that a stronger focus on drivers’ employment histories, and on the often-unexplored dynamics of drivers’ internal class stratification, are essential to understanding why some drivers consider themselves to be their own boss, whilst others do not.

Abstract Image

“我喜欢做自己的老板(但工作要了我的命)”:非洲城市叫车司机对工作的矛盾看法
随着数字就业变得越来越重要,围绕数字工作者应被归类为独立合作伙伴还是雇员,出现了许多法律案件。员工选择是否为一款应用工作以及为其工作多长时间的自由,是平台公司认为自己只是独立合作伙伴的技术提供商的论点的核心。相反,那些认为叫车工作是不受保护的工资工作的人强调了应用程序的严格控制。本文借鉴了在达累斯萨拉姆、约翰内斯堡和内罗毕进行的混合方法研究,通过分析网约车司机对工作的矛盾看法,为文献做出了贡献。网约车司机在应用程序的严格控制下工作,但往往认为自己是自己的老板。文章回顾了一些文献,这些文献将这种悖论解释为应用程序对工作的成功意识形态控制的结果,这种控制是霸权的,被司机内化,诱导他们同意。然后讨论了这种解释的价值和局限性。报告认为,更关注司机的就业历史,以及司机内部阶级分层的经常未被探索的动态,对于理解为什么有些司机认为自己是自己的老板,而另一些则不认为是自己的老板,是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Development and Change
Development and Change DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
3.30%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Development and Change is essential reading for anyone interested in development studies and social change. It publishes articles from a wide range of authors, both well-established specialists and young scholars, and is an important resource for: - social science faculties and research institutions - international development agencies and NGOs - graduate teachers and researchers - all those with a serious interest in the dynamics of development, from reflective activists to analytical practitioners
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信