The Cost-Effectiveness of an Intervention to Preserve Independence in People With Dementia (Vs. No Intervention): A Decision-Analytic (Markov) Model Analysis
Luke Paterson, Rachel A. Elliott, Fofi Constantinidou, Renaud David, Piers Dawes, Eric Frison, Mark Hann, Hannah Hussain, Iracema Leroi, Antonis M. Politis, Chryssoula Thodi, Elizabeth M. Camacho, SENSE-Cog Study Team
{"title":"The Cost-Effectiveness of an Intervention to Preserve Independence in People With Dementia (Vs. No Intervention): A Decision-Analytic (Markov) Model Analysis","authors":"Luke Paterson, Rachel A. Elliott, Fofi Constantinidou, Renaud David, Piers Dawes, Eric Frison, Mark Hann, Hannah Hussain, Iracema Leroi, Antonis M. Politis, Chryssoula Thodi, Elizabeth M. Camacho, SENSE-Cog Study Team","doi":"10.1002/gps.70132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Interventions that enable people with dementia to retain some independence in activities of daily living (ADL) may delay transitions into residential care and offset sharp reductions in quality of life (QoL). The aim of this study was to estimate how effective a hypothetical intervention needs to be at preserving independence in home-dwelling people with dementia, to be cost-effective.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A decision-analytic model was constructed to compare costs and outcomes of a cohort of people with dementia in the United Kingdom and European Union over a 10-year period. At model entry, the cohort was distributed across low, moderate, or high levels of dependence. The impact of a hypothetical intervention that preserves independence was evaluated by reducing the proportion of people entering the model with moderate and high dependence. The model included costs for the intervention and health and social care resource use. Secondary analysis included estimated costs of informal care. Health benefit was measured as quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The cost of the intervention was £570/person. At this cost, an intervention that resulted in 7.5% of the sample entering the model in a lower level of dependence (compared with no intervention) was likely to be cost-effective (£8690/QALY). An intervention costing £250/person would only need a 2.5% effect and one costing £1000/person would need to have a 10% effect to be potentially cost-effective. Including informal care costs increased the size of the effect required for the intervention to be cost-effective because more of the care provided at lower levels of dependence is informal.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Preserving independence in people with dementia may be a cost-effective way to help them live well for longer. Our results provide a guide on costs and required effects for those developing interventions to preserve independence in people with dementia.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14060,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","volume":"40 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/gps.70132","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gps.70132","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
Interventions that enable people with dementia to retain some independence in activities of daily living (ADL) may delay transitions into residential care and offset sharp reductions in quality of life (QoL). The aim of this study was to estimate how effective a hypothetical intervention needs to be at preserving independence in home-dwelling people with dementia, to be cost-effective.
Methods
A decision-analytic model was constructed to compare costs and outcomes of a cohort of people with dementia in the United Kingdom and European Union over a 10-year period. At model entry, the cohort was distributed across low, moderate, or high levels of dependence. The impact of a hypothetical intervention that preserves independence was evaluated by reducing the proportion of people entering the model with moderate and high dependence. The model included costs for the intervention and health and social care resource use. Secondary analysis included estimated costs of informal care. Health benefit was measured as quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs).
Results
The cost of the intervention was £570/person. At this cost, an intervention that resulted in 7.5% of the sample entering the model in a lower level of dependence (compared with no intervention) was likely to be cost-effective (£8690/QALY). An intervention costing £250/person would only need a 2.5% effect and one costing £1000/person would need to have a 10% effect to be potentially cost-effective. Including informal care costs increased the size of the effect required for the intervention to be cost-effective because more of the care provided at lower levels of dependence is informal.
Conclusions
Preserving independence in people with dementia may be a cost-effective way to help them live well for longer. Our results provide a guide on costs and required effects for those developing interventions to preserve independence in people with dementia.
期刊介绍:
The rapidly increasing world population of aged people has led to a growing need to focus attention on the problems of mental disorder in late life. The aim of the Journal is to communicate the results of original research in the causes, treatment and care of all forms of mental disorder which affect the elderly. The Journal is of interest to psychiatrists, psychologists, social scientists, nurses and others engaged in therapeutic professions, together with general neurobiological researchers.
The Journal provides an international perspective on the important issue of geriatric psychiatry, and contributions are published from countries throughout the world. Topics covered include epidemiology of mental disorders in old age, clinical aetiological research, post-mortem pathological and neurochemical studies, treatment trials and evaluation of geriatric psychiatry services.