The Use of the Anxiety, Depression and Mood Scale (ADAMS) as a Screening Instrument for Depression and Mental Health Diagnoses in a Down Syndrome Specialty Clinic

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Mary Witt, Anna J. Esbensen, Ayesha Harisinghani, Nicolas M. Oreskovic, Michelle Palumbo, Stephanie L. Santoro
{"title":"The Use of the Anxiety, Depression and Mood Scale (ADAMS) as a Screening Instrument for Depression and Mental Health Diagnoses in a Down Syndrome Specialty Clinic","authors":"Mary Witt,&nbsp;Anna J. Esbensen,&nbsp;Ayesha Harisinghani,&nbsp;Nicolas M. Oreskovic,&nbsp;Michelle Palumbo,&nbsp;Stephanie L. Santoro","doi":"10.1111/jar.70097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>The Anxiety, Depression and Mood Scale (ADAMS), a mental health screening tool developed for individuals with intellectual disabilities, has yet to be evaluated in adults with Down syndrome. We included the ADAMS in a Dementia Protocol.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>We reviewed the charts of 71 adults with Down syndrome seen in a specialty clinic and collected ADAMS data from our quality improvement project. We evaluated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of the ADAMS at five cutoff points to identify optimal screening thresholds for adults with Down syndrome.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Cutoff points set at two points below the 75th percentile scores of the original ADAMS publication presented optimal sensitivity of 81.82%, specificity of 82.93%, PPV of 72.00% and NPV of 89.47%.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>For adults with Down syndrome, we suggest alternate thresholds, generally two points below the original ADAMS thresholds, to adequately capture mental health concerns.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51403,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities","volume":"38 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jar.70097","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The Anxiety, Depression and Mood Scale (ADAMS), a mental health screening tool developed for individuals with intellectual disabilities, has yet to be evaluated in adults with Down syndrome. We included the ADAMS in a Dementia Protocol.

Method

We reviewed the charts of 71 adults with Down syndrome seen in a specialty clinic and collected ADAMS data from our quality improvement project. We evaluated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of the ADAMS at five cutoff points to identify optimal screening thresholds for adults with Down syndrome.

Results

Cutoff points set at two points below the 75th percentile scores of the original ADAMS publication presented optimal sensitivity of 81.82%, specificity of 82.93%, PPV of 72.00% and NPV of 89.47%.

Conclusion

For adults with Down syndrome, we suggest alternate thresholds, generally two points below the original ADAMS thresholds, to adequately capture mental health concerns.

焦虑、抑郁和情绪量表(ADAMS)在唐氏综合征专科门诊抑郁和心理健康诊断中的应用
焦虑、抑郁和情绪量表(ADAMS)是一种为智力障碍患者开发的心理健康筛查工具,目前尚未对成人唐氏综合症患者进行评估。我们将ADAMS纳入痴呆方案。方法回顾某专科诊所71例唐氏综合征成人病历,收集质量改进项目的ADAMS数据。我们在五个截断点评估ADAMS的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV),以确定成人唐氏综合征的最佳筛查阈值。结果在ADAMS原始出版物的第75百分位评分低于2个点处设置的截断点的最佳灵敏度为81.82%,特异性为82.93%,PPV为72.00%,NPV为89.47%。结论对于患有唐氏综合症的成年人,我们建议替代阈值,通常比最初的ADAMS阈值低两点,以充分反映心理健康问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
79
期刊介绍: JARID is an international, peer-reviewed journal which draws together findings derived from original applied research in intellectual disabilities. The journal is an important forum for the dissemination of ideas to promote valued lifestyles for people with intellectual disabilities. It reports on research from the UK and overseas by authors from all relevant professional disciplines. It is aimed at an international, multi-disciplinary readership. Topics covered include community living, quality of life, challenging behaviour, communication, sexuality, medication, ageing, supported employment, family issues, mental health, physical health, autism, economic issues, social networks, staff stress, staff training, epidemiology and service provision.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信