Louise Forsblom, Susanna Jernberg, Harri Kuosa, Kirsi Kostamo, Camilla Gustafsson, Elina A. Virtanen
{"title":"Integrating Regulating Ecosystem Services in Marine Conservation Planning","authors":"Louise Forsblom, Susanna Jernberg, Harri Kuosa, Kirsi Kostamo, Camilla Gustafsson, Elina A. Virtanen","doi":"10.1002/aqc.70196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Traditionally protected areas are designed to support the conservation of threatened species, habitats, and biodiversity. To also properly safeguard ecosystem functioning and services, protected area siting should consider more dimensions when moving towards the 30% protection targets. All species are not equal in terms of the ecosystem services they deliver, and e.g., carbon sequestration studies have focused on few species and habitats. The present study identifies key areas important for the conservation of regulating ecosystem service supply, by also considering species-specific traits such as size, lifespan, and growth form. We used an extensive data set covering over 170,000 observations of underwater marine diversity including algae, macrophytes and fauna, to produce maps on the spatial distribution of regulating services, including bioremediation and filtration/sequestration/storage/accumulation of wastes and nutrients by algae, macrophytes and fauna, control of erosion and flooding, oxygen production and carbon sequestration and storage. We further identified key ecosystem service areas and optimal areas for increasing the protection of ecosystem services. The current marine protected area network covers only 24% of the service supply of the investigated services on average, but already with one well-targeted percentage point increase the service features covered would almost triple. The identified key ecosystem service areas and expansion candidates highlight the critical role of shallow coastal ecosystems and adjacent reef areas in supporting ecosystem service supply. The identified key areas are likely important for cultural services, with much of the human pressures focused close to shore, highlighting the need for further investigations into trade-offs between services and protected areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":55493,"journal":{"name":"Aquatic Conservation-Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems","volume":"35 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aqc.70196","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aquatic Conservation-Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aqc.70196","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Traditionally protected areas are designed to support the conservation of threatened species, habitats, and biodiversity. To also properly safeguard ecosystem functioning and services, protected area siting should consider more dimensions when moving towards the 30% protection targets. All species are not equal in terms of the ecosystem services they deliver, and e.g., carbon sequestration studies have focused on few species and habitats. The present study identifies key areas important for the conservation of regulating ecosystem service supply, by also considering species-specific traits such as size, lifespan, and growth form. We used an extensive data set covering over 170,000 observations of underwater marine diversity including algae, macrophytes and fauna, to produce maps on the spatial distribution of regulating services, including bioremediation and filtration/sequestration/storage/accumulation of wastes and nutrients by algae, macrophytes and fauna, control of erosion and flooding, oxygen production and carbon sequestration and storage. We further identified key ecosystem service areas and optimal areas for increasing the protection of ecosystem services. The current marine protected area network covers only 24% of the service supply of the investigated services on average, but already with one well-targeted percentage point increase the service features covered would almost triple. The identified key ecosystem service areas and expansion candidates highlight the critical role of shallow coastal ecosystems and adjacent reef areas in supporting ecosystem service supply. The identified key areas are likely important for cultural services, with much of the human pressures focused close to shore, highlighting the need for further investigations into trade-offs between services and protected areas.
期刊介绍:
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems is an international journal dedicated to publishing original papers that relate specifically to freshwater, brackish or marine habitats and encouraging work that spans these ecosystems. This journal provides a forum in which all aspects of the conservation of aquatic biological resources can be presented and discussed, enabling greater cooperation and efficiency in solving problems in aquatic resource conservation.