Levosimendán ambulatorio intermitente en pacientes ancianos con insuficiencia cardiaca avanzada: registro LEVO-D

Q4 Medicine
Carla Iglesias Otero , David Dobarro Pérez , Carlos Rodríguez Pascual , Javier de Juan Bagudá , Fernando de Frutos Seminario , José González Costello , en representación de los miembros del registro español LEVO-D
{"title":"Levosimendán ambulatorio intermitente en pacientes ancianos con insuficiencia cardiaca avanzada: registro LEVO-D","authors":"Carla Iglesias Otero ,&nbsp;David Dobarro Pérez ,&nbsp;Carlos Rodríguez Pascual ,&nbsp;Javier de Juan Bagudá ,&nbsp;Fernando de Frutos Seminario ,&nbsp;José González Costello ,&nbsp;en representación de los miembros del registro español LEVO-D","doi":"10.1016/j.rccl.2025.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction and objectives</h3><div>Elderly patients with advanced heart failure (AHF) who are not candidates for advanced treatments have a poor prognosis. The objective of this study is to describe patterns of use and safety of intermittent ambulatory infusion of levosimendan in patients older than 75<!--> <!-->years with AHF as a treatment option, compared to patients younger than 75<!--> <!-->years.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A multicenter retrospective analysis was performed involving 23 tertiary hospitals (January 2015-September 2020). A total of 404 patients were enrolled (37% older than 75<!--> <!-->years and 63% younger than 75<!--> <!-->years). Patients had to be on optimal medical treatment. Patients with onset heart failure (HF) or patients undergoing any procedure that would improve prognosis after starting levosimendan were excluded.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A Cox regression model showed that 1-year response (defined as absence of death, HF admission, or unplanned HF visit) did not differ between patients. Levosimendan administration had to be discontinued more frequently in patients older than 75<!--> <!-->years due to lack of efficacy and side effects (40.7% discontinued), but this was not associated with an increase in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy 1<!--> <!-->year before and 1<!--> <!-->year after drug administration.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The LEVO-D registry adds information to the current limited scientific evidence on the prognosis of elderly patients with AHF and suggests that levosimendan is a safe option that can reduce readmissions and emergency visits for HF.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36870,"journal":{"name":"REC: CardioClinics","volume":"60 3","pages":"Pages 204-212"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REC: CardioClinics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2605153225000421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and objectives

Elderly patients with advanced heart failure (AHF) who are not candidates for advanced treatments have a poor prognosis. The objective of this study is to describe patterns of use and safety of intermittent ambulatory infusion of levosimendan in patients older than 75 years with AHF as a treatment option, compared to patients younger than 75 years.

Methods

A multicenter retrospective analysis was performed involving 23 tertiary hospitals (January 2015-September 2020). A total of 404 patients were enrolled (37% older than 75 years and 63% younger than 75 years). Patients had to be on optimal medical treatment. Patients with onset heart failure (HF) or patients undergoing any procedure that would improve prognosis after starting levosimendan were excluded.

Results

A Cox regression model showed that 1-year response (defined as absence of death, HF admission, or unplanned HF visit) did not differ between patients. Levosimendan administration had to be discontinued more frequently in patients older than 75 years due to lack of efficacy and side effects (40.7% discontinued), but this was not associated with an increase in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy 1 year before and 1 year after drug administration.

Conclusions

The LEVO-D registry adds information to the current limited scientific evidence on the prognosis of elderly patients with AHF and suggests that levosimendan is a safe option that can reduce readmissions and emergency visits for HF.
晚期心力衰竭老年患者间歇性左旋西门丹:LEVO-D记录
老年晚期心力衰竭(AHF)患者不适合晚期治疗,预后较差。本研究的目的是描述75岁以上AHF患者与75岁以下AHF患者相比,左西孟旦间歇性动态输注作为治疗选择的使用模式和安全性。方法对2015年1月- 2020年9月23所三级医院进行多中心回顾性分析。共有404名患者入组(37%年龄大于75岁,63%年龄小于75岁)。病人必须得到最佳的治疗。排除了起病心力衰竭(HF)患者或在开始左西孟旦后接受任何可改善预后的手术的患者。结果Cox回归模型显示,1年疗效(定义为无死亡、心衰入院或计划外心衰就诊)在患者之间无差异。由于缺乏疗效和副作用,75岁以上患者左西孟旦停药的频率更高(40.7%停药),但这与用药前1年和用药后1年植入式心律转复除颤器治疗的增加无关。结论:LEVO-D登记增加了目前有限的老年AHF患者预后的科学证据,并提示左西孟旦是一种安全的选择,可以减少心衰患者的再入院和急诊次数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
REC: CardioClinics
REC: CardioClinics Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
33 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信