Do macroprudential policies influence FinTech credit growth?

IF 4.7 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Onneetse L. Sikalao-Lekobane
{"title":"Do macroprudential policies influence FinTech credit growth?","authors":"Onneetse L. Sikalao-Lekobane","doi":"10.1016/j.econmod.2025.107233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the impact of macroprudential policies on FinTech credit growth using unbalanced panel dataset from 25 countries, comprising advanced and emerging economies, covering 2005q1 to 2018q4. Employing fixed effects (FE) and feasible generalized least squares (FGLS) models, the analysis reveals that aggregate macroprudential policy action positively influences FinTech credit growth. The analysis further uncovers that the tightening action of macroprudential policies largely drives this effect, suggesting regulatory arbitrage where credit shifts from banks to the nonbank FinTech sector. The findings raise concerns that macroprudential policies effectiveness may be undermined by FinTech credit expansion, potentially increasing financial stability risks. The research calls for policy measures addressing FinTech credit to ensure a stable financial system and prevent regulatory leakage. It also provides insights into the debate on using macroprudential policies beyond the banking sector.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48419,"journal":{"name":"Economic Modelling","volume":"151 ","pages":"Article 107233"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Modelling","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264999325002287","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the impact of macroprudential policies on FinTech credit growth using unbalanced panel dataset from 25 countries, comprising advanced and emerging economies, covering 2005q1 to 2018q4. Employing fixed effects (FE) and feasible generalized least squares (FGLS) models, the analysis reveals that aggregate macroprudential policy action positively influences FinTech credit growth. The analysis further uncovers that the tightening action of macroprudential policies largely drives this effect, suggesting regulatory arbitrage where credit shifts from banks to the nonbank FinTech sector. The findings raise concerns that macroprudential policies effectiveness may be undermined by FinTech credit expansion, potentially increasing financial stability risks. The research calls for policy measures addressing FinTech credit to ensure a stable financial system and prevent regulatory leakage. It also provides insights into the debate on using macroprudential policies beyond the banking sector.
宏观审慎政策会影响金融科技信贷增长吗?
本研究使用来自25个国家(包括发达经济体和新兴经济体)的不平衡面板数据集,研究了宏观审慎政策对金融科技信贷增长的影响,涵盖2005年第一季度至2018年第四季度。采用固定效应(FE)和可行广义最小二乘(FGLS)模型进行分析,发现总体宏观审慎政策行动对金融科技信贷增长具有正向影响。分析进一步发现,宏观审慎政策的收紧行动在很大程度上推动了这种效应,表明信贷从银行转移到非银行金融科技行业的监管套利。研究结果引发了人们的担忧,即金融科技信贷扩张可能会削弱宏观审慎政策的有效性,从而潜在地增加金融稳定风险。该研究呼吁采取政策措施解决金融科技信贷问题,以确保金融体系稳定,防止监管漏洞。它还提供了关于在银行业之外使用宏观审慎政策的辩论的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Economic Modelling
Economic Modelling ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
10.60%
发文量
295
期刊介绍: Economic Modelling fills a major gap in the economics literature, providing a single source of both theoretical and applied papers on economic modelling. The journal prime objective is to provide an international review of the state-of-the-art in economic modelling. Economic Modelling publishes the complete versions of many large-scale models of industrially advanced economies which have been developed for policy analysis. Examples are the Bank of England Model and the US Federal Reserve Board Model which had hitherto been unpublished. As individual models are revised and updated, the journal publishes subsequent papers dealing with these revisions, so keeping its readers as up to date as possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信