Aesthetic preferences for forests after climate change-induced disturbance: A discrete choice experiment accounting for temporal evolution of reforestation measures
Paul Averbeck , Tobias Börger , Sören Bo Weiß , Florian Knutzen , Oliver Frör
{"title":"Aesthetic preferences for forests after climate change-induced disturbance: A discrete choice experiment accounting for temporal evolution of reforestation measures","authors":"Paul Averbeck , Tobias Börger , Sören Bo Weiß , Florian Knutzen , Oliver Frör","doi":"10.1016/j.landurbplan.2025.105455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In recent years, extensive forest areas across Central Europe have experienced significant dieback due to climate change-induced disturbances such as drought and insect outbreaks, prompting the need for large-scale reforestation efforts. Given the importance of forests as recreational spaces, it is essential to understand how different reforestation strategies impact forest aesthetics. This study employs a discrete choice experiment to examine how deadwood management, species composition, tree protection, tree spacing, and forest floor conditions influence aesthetic preferences. Using visual prompts specifically developed to capture temporal evolution, we assess preferences for these factors at three time points: immediately, 15 years, and 50 years after the implementation of measures. Results suggest that most respondents perceive substantial amounts of deadwood and many mixed forest compositions as aesthetically unappealing. Additionally, the aesthetic evaluation of the same policies varies significantly over time. This underscores the importance of incorporating multiple time points into the assessment of forest management practices to fully understand their long-term effects on forest aesthetics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54744,"journal":{"name":"Landscape and Urban Planning","volume":"263 ","pages":"Article 105455"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Landscape and Urban Planning","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204625001628","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In recent years, extensive forest areas across Central Europe have experienced significant dieback due to climate change-induced disturbances such as drought and insect outbreaks, prompting the need for large-scale reforestation efforts. Given the importance of forests as recreational spaces, it is essential to understand how different reforestation strategies impact forest aesthetics. This study employs a discrete choice experiment to examine how deadwood management, species composition, tree protection, tree spacing, and forest floor conditions influence aesthetic preferences. Using visual prompts specifically developed to capture temporal evolution, we assess preferences for these factors at three time points: immediately, 15 years, and 50 years after the implementation of measures. Results suggest that most respondents perceive substantial amounts of deadwood and many mixed forest compositions as aesthetically unappealing. Additionally, the aesthetic evaluation of the same policies varies significantly over time. This underscores the importance of incorporating multiple time points into the assessment of forest management practices to fully understand their long-term effects on forest aesthetics.
期刊介绍:
Landscape and Urban Planning is an international journal that aims to enhance our understanding of landscapes and promote sustainable solutions for landscape change. The journal focuses on landscapes as complex social-ecological systems that encompass various spatial and temporal dimensions. These landscapes possess aesthetic, natural, and cultural qualities that are valued by individuals in different ways, leading to actions that alter the landscape. With increasing urbanization and the need for ecological and cultural sensitivity at various scales, a multidisciplinary approach is necessary to comprehend and align social and ecological values for landscape sustainability. The journal believes that combining landscape science with planning and design can yield positive outcomes for both people and nature.