Contested belonging: Britishness in post-brexit education

Shereen Hamed Shaw
{"title":"Contested belonging: Britishness in post-brexit education","authors":"Shereen Hamed Shaw","doi":"10.1016/j.socimp.2025.100127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper presents findings from a three-year research project exploring how British state policies, particularly the Prevent strategy and the promotion of Fundamental British Values (FBVs), impact young British Muslims' identity formation and sense of belonging. Conducted in educational and community settings in Northwest England, the study used a participatory methodology involving 61 youth co-researchers. Data from focus groups, interviews, and interfaith school events reveal that these policies, though intended to promote cohesion, often reinforce exclusionary narratives and surveillance of minority communities. Young participants shared experiences of racism, marginalisation, and hybrid identity negotiation within a post-Brexit climate marked by cultural anxiety. This research argues for a critical rethinking of national identity and civic education, advocating for inclusive approaches such as interfaith dialogue and youth civic engagement as counterbalances to securitised policy frameworks. The paper also addresses the replicability of its participatory research design. It proposes practical policy interventions grounded in empirical evidence and intervention into the ideological mechanisms that shape British civic life.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101167,"journal":{"name":"Societal Impacts","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100127"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Societal Impacts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949697725000268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents findings from a three-year research project exploring how British state policies, particularly the Prevent strategy and the promotion of Fundamental British Values (FBVs), impact young British Muslims' identity formation and sense of belonging. Conducted in educational and community settings in Northwest England, the study used a participatory methodology involving 61 youth co-researchers. Data from focus groups, interviews, and interfaith school events reveal that these policies, though intended to promote cohesion, often reinforce exclusionary narratives and surveillance of minority communities. Young participants shared experiences of racism, marginalisation, and hybrid identity negotiation within a post-Brexit climate marked by cultural anxiety. This research argues for a critical rethinking of national identity and civic education, advocating for inclusive approaches such as interfaith dialogue and youth civic engagement as counterbalances to securitised policy frameworks. The paper also addresses the replicability of its participatory research design. It proposes practical policy interventions grounded in empirical evidence and intervention into the ideological mechanisms that shape British civic life.
归属争议:英国脱欧后教育中的英国性
本文介绍了一项为期三年的研究项目的结果,该项目探讨了英国的国家政策,特别是预防战略和促进英国基本价值观(FBVs),如何影响年轻的英国穆斯林的身份形成和归属感。该研究在英格兰西北部的教育和社区环境中进行,采用参与式方法,涉及61名青年共同研究人员。来自焦点小组、访谈和跨宗教学校活动的数据显示,这些政策虽然旨在促进凝聚力,但往往会加强对少数族裔社区的排他性叙述和监督。年轻的参与者分享了在以文化焦虑为标志的后英国脱欧气候下的种族主义、边缘化和混合身份谈判的经历。本研究主张对国家认同和公民教育进行批判性反思,倡导采用包容性方法,如宗教间对话和青年公民参与,作为对证券化政策框架的制衡。本文还讨论了参与式研究设计的可复制性。它提出了基于经验证据的实际政策干预,以及对塑造英国公民生活的意识形态机制的干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信