Outcomes in patients with thermal injury treated with cefiderocol

Q3 Medicine
Heidi Michaels , Evelyn Coile , Samuel P. Mandell , Janie Faris
{"title":"Outcomes in patients with thermal injury treated with cefiderocol","authors":"Heidi Michaels ,&nbsp;Evelyn Coile ,&nbsp;Samuel P. Mandell ,&nbsp;Janie Faris","doi":"10.1016/j.burnso.2025.100418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Gram-negative infections in burn patients remain a challenge due to increasing antibiotic breakpoints and developing resistance of <em>Pseudomonas</em> species<em>, Enterobacter</em> species<em>,</em> and <em>Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.</em> Unfortunately, established breakpoints are lacking for newer antibiotic products in resistant Gram-negative bacteria; resulting in a significant obstacle when managing difficult to treat pathogens. Our goal was to determine if cefiderocol is efficacious in treating burn patients with Gram-negative bacterial infections.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We present 7 patients treated with cefiderocol for multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) infections. Ages ranged from 7 to 64 years old, with burn size 8–97.9 % total body surface area. Six patients had flame burn injuries while one had an electrical injury. Four patients sustained inhalation injury and five required continuous renal replacement therapy during their hospital stay. The median ABSI was 13, and the modified Baux score was 123. A median of 9 different antibiotic classes were used per patient prior to cefiderocol. Therapy with cefiderocol ranged from 7 to 80 days with aggressive dosing up to 2 g every 6 h to ensure adequate tissue concentration. Five patients survived and achieved clinical cure. Of the two patients who died, one demonstrated microbiological clearance. Both patients likely died from superinfection with invasive mold. Only one patient demonstrated subsequent cultures resistant to cefiderocol (osteomyelitis) which was cured with amputation. No adverse events were attributed to the cefiderocol regimens. Six of the seven patients showed microbiological clearance for Gram-negative bacteria. Additional studies in patients with large thermal injuries are needed to determine optimal dosing regimens for these hypermetabolic patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72486,"journal":{"name":"Burns open : an international open access journal for burn injuries","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100418"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Burns open : an international open access journal for burn injuries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468912225000264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gram-negative infections in burn patients remain a challenge due to increasing antibiotic breakpoints and developing resistance of Pseudomonas species, Enterobacter species, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Unfortunately, established breakpoints are lacking for newer antibiotic products in resistant Gram-negative bacteria; resulting in a significant obstacle when managing difficult to treat pathogens. Our goal was to determine if cefiderocol is efficacious in treating burn patients with Gram-negative bacterial infections.

Methods

We present 7 patients treated with cefiderocol for multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) infections. Ages ranged from 7 to 64 years old, with burn size 8–97.9 % total body surface area. Six patients had flame burn injuries while one had an electrical injury. Four patients sustained inhalation injury and five required continuous renal replacement therapy during their hospital stay. The median ABSI was 13, and the modified Baux score was 123. A median of 9 different antibiotic classes were used per patient prior to cefiderocol. Therapy with cefiderocol ranged from 7 to 80 days with aggressive dosing up to 2 g every 6 h to ensure adequate tissue concentration. Five patients survived and achieved clinical cure. Of the two patients who died, one demonstrated microbiological clearance. Both patients likely died from superinfection with invasive mold. Only one patient demonstrated subsequent cultures resistant to cefiderocol (osteomyelitis) which was cured with amputation. No adverse events were attributed to the cefiderocol regimens. Six of the seven patients showed microbiological clearance for Gram-negative bacteria. Additional studies in patients with large thermal injuries are needed to determine optimal dosing regimens for these hypermetabolic patients.
头孢地罗治疗热损伤患者的预后
烧伤患者的革兰氏阴性感染仍然是一个挑战,因为不断增加的抗生素断点和假单胞菌、肠杆菌和嗜麦芽窄养单胞菌的耐药性。不幸的是,在耐药革兰氏阴性细菌中,缺乏确定的新抗生素产品断点;导致在处理难以治疗的病原体时出现重大障碍。我们的目的是确定头孢地罗对革兰氏阴性细菌感染的烧伤患者是否有效。方法报告7例头孢地罗治疗多重耐药(MDR)和广泛耐药(XDR)感染的病例。年龄7 ~ 64岁,烧伤面积占体表面积的8 ~ 97.9%。6名患者有火焰烧伤,1名患者有电损伤。4例患者持续吸入性损伤,5例患者在住院期间需要持续肾脏替代治疗。中位ABSI为13,修正Baux评分为123。在头孢地罗之前,每位患者平均使用了9种不同的抗生素。头孢地罗治疗时间为7至80天,每6小时给药2克,以确保足够的组织浓度。5例患者存活并获得临床治愈。在两名死亡的患者中,一名显示微生物清除。两名患者可能都死于侵入性霉菌的重复感染。只有一名患者表现出对头孢地罗(骨髓炎)的耐药性,并通过截肢治愈。没有不良事件归因于头孢地罗方案。7例患者中有6例显示革兰氏阴性菌的微生物清除率。需要对大范围热损伤患者进行进一步研究,以确定这些高代谢患者的最佳给药方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信