Melissa Reichman , Ava Tsapatsaris , David Jaramillo Gil , Lisa Americo , Kemi Babagbemi , Katerina Dodelzon
{"title":"Evaluating provider knowledge and practices in breast cancer screening: Identifying gaps and barriers to informed referrals","authors":"Melissa Reichman , Ava Tsapatsaris , David Jaramillo Gil , Lisa Americo , Kemi Babagbemi , Katerina Dodelzon","doi":"10.1016/j.clinimag.2025.110561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To evaluate knowledge and practices of primary care providers on high-risk breast cancer screening imaging recommendations.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A 10-question anonymous survey was distributed via e-mail to primary care providers. The survey assessed provider knowledge of screening guidelines, current referral practices, perceived barriers to timely screening implementation, and preferences in screening methodologies. Responses were aggregated and results reported descriptively.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Response rate was 23.3 % (49/210). Majority 55 % (27/49) were obstetricians or gynecologists, 35 % (17/49) were internal medicine or primary care physicians, and 10 % (5/49) were advanced practice providers from the obstetrics and gynecology and internal medicine departments. Nearly all the respondents reported that they routinely assess patients for breast cancer risk. However, more than a quarter (28 %, 14/49) of respondents disagreed that all women should have their lifetime risk of breast cancer assessed by age 25–30, with those remote from their training more likely to disagree (<em>p</em> < 0.001). There was variability in knowledge of appropriate breast imaging screening exam for those identified as high-risk for developing breast cancer, with MRI (69 %, 34/49), mammography (65 %, 32/49), ultrasound (59 %, 29/49), and genetic testing (55 %, 27/49) all being recommended in close proportions. Multiple barriers to routine cancer risk assessment were identified, with time constraints (20 %, 8/40), cost (18 %, 7/40) and lack of knowledge (18 %, 7/40) of assessment tools most frequently reported.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>High-risk breast cancer screening recommendations practice patterns vary among different specialty primary care providers. Lack of time and knowledge were the main barriers for breast cancer risk assessment evaluation. Future interventions should focus on provider education to optimize imaging recommendations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50680,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Imaging","volume":"125 ","pages":"Article 110561"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899707125001615","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate knowledge and practices of primary care providers on high-risk breast cancer screening imaging recommendations.
Methods
A 10-question anonymous survey was distributed via e-mail to primary care providers. The survey assessed provider knowledge of screening guidelines, current referral practices, perceived barriers to timely screening implementation, and preferences in screening methodologies. Responses were aggregated and results reported descriptively.
Results
Response rate was 23.3 % (49/210). Majority 55 % (27/49) were obstetricians or gynecologists, 35 % (17/49) were internal medicine or primary care physicians, and 10 % (5/49) were advanced practice providers from the obstetrics and gynecology and internal medicine departments. Nearly all the respondents reported that they routinely assess patients for breast cancer risk. However, more than a quarter (28 %, 14/49) of respondents disagreed that all women should have their lifetime risk of breast cancer assessed by age 25–30, with those remote from their training more likely to disagree (p < 0.001). There was variability in knowledge of appropriate breast imaging screening exam for those identified as high-risk for developing breast cancer, with MRI (69 %, 34/49), mammography (65 %, 32/49), ultrasound (59 %, 29/49), and genetic testing (55 %, 27/49) all being recommended in close proportions. Multiple barriers to routine cancer risk assessment were identified, with time constraints (20 %, 8/40), cost (18 %, 7/40) and lack of knowledge (18 %, 7/40) of assessment tools most frequently reported.
Conclusion
High-risk breast cancer screening recommendations practice patterns vary among different specialty primary care providers. Lack of time and knowledge were the main barriers for breast cancer risk assessment evaluation. Future interventions should focus on provider education to optimize imaging recommendations.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Clinical Imaging is to publish, in a timely manner, the very best radiology research from the United States and around the world with special attention to the impact of medical imaging on patient care. The journal''s publications cover all imaging modalities, radiology issues related to patients, policy and practice improvements, and clinically-oriented imaging physics and informatics. The journal is a valuable resource for practicing radiologists, radiologists-in-training and other clinicians with an interest in imaging. Papers are carefully peer-reviewed and selected by our experienced subject editors who are leading experts spanning the range of imaging sub-specialties, which include:
-Body Imaging-
Breast Imaging-
Cardiothoracic Imaging-
Imaging Physics and Informatics-
Molecular Imaging and Nuclear Medicine-
Musculoskeletal and Emergency Imaging-
Neuroradiology-
Practice, Policy & Education-
Pediatric Imaging-
Vascular and Interventional Radiology