Investigating preferences and price sensitivity of incentive-based recycling of household waste in emerging megacities

IF 8.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Wenjing Xu , Xueqian Lyu , Yu Chen , Jieyu Zhou , Shuyi Sun , Yee Van Fan , Huijuan Dong , Peng Jiang
{"title":"Investigating preferences and price sensitivity of incentive-based recycling of household waste in emerging megacities","authors":"Wenjing Xu ,&nbsp;Xueqian Lyu ,&nbsp;Yu Chen ,&nbsp;Jieyu Zhou ,&nbsp;Shuyi Sun ,&nbsp;Yee Van Fan ,&nbsp;Huijuan Dong ,&nbsp;Peng Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While the pay-as-you-throw approach is widely adopted, some emerging megacities have successfully implemented incentive-based schemes to encourage residents to participate in waste recycling. A common incentive is rewarding residents based on the value of recyclables (e.g., monetary incentives or accumulated points used for gift exchange). However, monetary incentives are subject to fluctuations in recycling market prices, which may further influence residents' recycling behavior. To evaluate whether such price fluctuations will affect residents' willingness to participate in household waste recycling in emerging megacities, it is crucial to examine residents' sensitivity to the price of recyclables. In this study, we investigated residents' preferences for different incentives and residents’ price sensitivity of incentive-based recycling of household waste by building models on preference heterogeneity analysis and price sensitivity measurement (PSM). Analysis results based on first-hand data from two emerging megacities yield several findings. First, residents exhibit a stronger preference for monetary incentives and practical items (e.g., daily necessities and groceries). Second, preferences for reward types vary across emerging megacities (e.g., different preferences shown for entertainment products and subsidies incentives), implying that a one-size-fits-all incentive scheme is not effective among cities. Third, fluctuations in the pricing of recyclables do influence the willingness to participate in recycling. However, it is essential to ensure the price adjustments do not devalue the perceived worth of recyclables. The quantitative analysis suggests that megacities like Shanghai and Chengdu should not reduce the price by over 21.15 % and 13.74 %, respectively. These new findings could provide policy-relevant insights to stakeholders in the household waste recycling industry of emerging megacities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"392 ","pages":"Article 126595"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030147972502571X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While the pay-as-you-throw approach is widely adopted, some emerging megacities have successfully implemented incentive-based schemes to encourage residents to participate in waste recycling. A common incentive is rewarding residents based on the value of recyclables (e.g., monetary incentives or accumulated points used for gift exchange). However, monetary incentives are subject to fluctuations in recycling market prices, which may further influence residents' recycling behavior. To evaluate whether such price fluctuations will affect residents' willingness to participate in household waste recycling in emerging megacities, it is crucial to examine residents' sensitivity to the price of recyclables. In this study, we investigated residents' preferences for different incentives and residents’ price sensitivity of incentive-based recycling of household waste by building models on preference heterogeneity analysis and price sensitivity measurement (PSM). Analysis results based on first-hand data from two emerging megacities yield several findings. First, residents exhibit a stronger preference for monetary incentives and practical items (e.g., daily necessities and groceries). Second, preferences for reward types vary across emerging megacities (e.g., different preferences shown for entertainment products and subsidies incentives), implying that a one-size-fits-all incentive scheme is not effective among cities. Third, fluctuations in the pricing of recyclables do influence the willingness to participate in recycling. However, it is essential to ensure the price adjustments do not devalue the perceived worth of recyclables. The quantitative analysis suggests that megacities like Shanghai and Chengdu should not reduce the price by over 21.15 % and 13.74 %, respectively. These new findings could provide policy-relevant insights to stakeholders in the household waste recycling industry of emerging megacities.
调查新兴大城市基于激励的家庭垃圾回收的偏好和价格敏感性
虽然按量收费的做法已被广泛采用,但一些新兴大城市已成功实施了以奖励为基础的计划,鼓励居民参与废物回收。一种常见的激励措施是根据可回收物品的价值奖励居民(例如,货币奖励或用于礼品交换的累积积分)。然而,货币激励受到回收市场价格波动的影响,这可能会进一步影响居民的回收行为。为了评估这种价格波动是否会影响新兴特大城市居民参与生活垃圾回收的意愿,检验居民对可回收物价格的敏感性至关重要。在本研究中,我们通过建立偏好异质性分析和价格敏感性测量(PSM)模型,考察了居民对不同激励措施的偏好以及居民对基于激励措施的生活垃圾回收的价格敏感性。基于来自两个新兴特大城市的第一手数据的分析结果得出了以下几点发现。首先,居民对金钱奖励和实用物品(如日用品和杂货)的偏好更强。其次,新兴特大城市对奖励类型的偏好不同(例如,对娱乐产品和补贴激励的偏好不同),这意味着“一刀切”的激励方案在城市之间并不有效。第三,可回收物价格的波动确实影响了参与回收的意愿。然而,确保价格调整不会降低可回收物的感知价值是至关重要的。定量分析表明,上海和成都等特大城市的房价降幅不应分别超过21.15%和13.74%。这些新发现可以为新兴特大城市生活垃圾回收行业的利益相关者提供与政策相关的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信