Anneke van der Walt, Eva M. M. Strijbis, Francesca Bridge, Timothy Coetzee, Jennifer Graves, Wallace J. Brownlee, Helmut Butzkueven, Ruth Ann Marrie, Le H. Hua, Anna Lampe, Mar Tintore, Xavier Montalban, Peter A. Calabresi, Frederik Barkhof
{"title":"Advancing multiple sclerosis management in older adults","authors":"Anneke van der Walt, Eva M. M. Strijbis, Francesca Bridge, Timothy Coetzee, Jennifer Graves, Wallace J. Brownlee, Helmut Butzkueven, Ruth Ann Marrie, Le H. Hua, Anna Lampe, Mar Tintore, Xavier Montalban, Peter A. Calabresi, Frederik Barkhof","doi":"10.1038/s41582-025-01115-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Multiple sclerosis (MS) typically presents in early to middle adulthood, but owing to advancements in health care, many individuals with MS now live a normal lifespan, and approximately half of the people currently living with MS are ≥50 years of age. As people living with MS age, their diagnosis, treatment and disease management become more complex owing to the effects of ageing, immunosenescence and comorbidities. Furthermore, diagnosis of late-onset MS (onset above 50 years of age) often requires additional tests, such as spinal cord imaging and cerebrospinal fluid analysis, to differentiate the disease from age-associated conditions such as cerebrovascular disease. Monitoring disease progression also becomes more complicated with increasing age, as physiological age-related changes can confound MRI findings and measurements of disability and cognition. Treatment decisions in older people with MS are also challenging, as high-efficacy treatments carry increased risks with ageing and their benefits can be reduced, yet little evidence is available to guide treatment in older adults. In this Consensus statement, we present the outcomes of an International Advisory Committee on Clinical Trials (IACCT) in MS workshop on ageing and MS; we review the current status of the field and identify knowledge gaps, and provide recommendations to advance the areas of unmet need.</p>","PeriodicalId":19085,"journal":{"name":"Nature Reviews Neurology","volume":"115 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":33.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Reviews Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-025-01115-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) typically presents in early to middle adulthood, but owing to advancements in health care, many individuals with MS now live a normal lifespan, and approximately half of the people currently living with MS are ≥50 years of age. As people living with MS age, their diagnosis, treatment and disease management become more complex owing to the effects of ageing, immunosenescence and comorbidities. Furthermore, diagnosis of late-onset MS (onset above 50 years of age) often requires additional tests, such as spinal cord imaging and cerebrospinal fluid analysis, to differentiate the disease from age-associated conditions such as cerebrovascular disease. Monitoring disease progression also becomes more complicated with increasing age, as physiological age-related changes can confound MRI findings and measurements of disability and cognition. Treatment decisions in older people with MS are also challenging, as high-efficacy treatments carry increased risks with ageing and their benefits can be reduced, yet little evidence is available to guide treatment in older adults. In this Consensus statement, we present the outcomes of an International Advisory Committee on Clinical Trials (IACCT) in MS workshop on ageing and MS; we review the current status of the field and identify knowledge gaps, and provide recommendations to advance the areas of unmet need.
期刊介绍:
Nature Reviews Neurology aims to be the premier source of reviews and commentaries for the scientific and clinical communities we serve. We want to provide an unparalleled service to authors, referees, and readers, and we work hard to maximize the usefulness and impact of each article. The journal publishes Research Highlights, Comments, News & Views, Reviews, Consensus Statements, and Perspectives relevant to researchers and clinicians working in the field of neurology. Our broad scope ensures that the work we publish reaches the widest possible audience. Our articles are authoritative, accessible, and enhanced with clearly understandable figures, tables, and other display items. This page gives more detail about the aims and scope of the journal.