Triglyceride-Glucose Index Is Associated With Restenosis After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Drug-Coated Balloons in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease.

Hui Zhao, Yutao Sun, Bao Fu, Yupeng Hou, Ting Wang
{"title":"Triglyceride-Glucose Index Is Associated With Restenosis After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Drug-Coated Balloons in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease.","authors":"Hui Zhao, Yutao Sun, Bao Fu, Yupeng Hou, Ting Wang","doi":"10.1002/ccd.70025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Drug-coated balloon (DCB) has become a common treatment, but restenosis may still occur after DCB. The association of the triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index with coronary atherosclerotic heart disease prognosis has been demonstrated. However, the relationship between the TyG index and restenosis after DCB-only remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the TyG index and restenosis after DCB-only.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The present study retrospectively recruited patients who underwent coronary angiography at 6-36 months after successful based DCB-only percutaneous coronary intervention. Subgroup analyses, correlation analyses, and, most importantly, a multivariate logistic regression analysis model were also constructed to assess the association between TyG index and restenosis after DCB treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 173 patients received DCB-only therapy (58.22 ± 11.16 years of age, 74.6% male) were included in this study (mean follow-up time of 13.0 ± 7.7 months). The TyG index was higher in the restenosis group than in the non-restenosis group at both baseline (9.24 ± 0.73 vs. 8.65 ± 0.60, p < 0.001) and follow-up (9.00 ± 0.77 vs. 8.54 ± 0.55, p < 0.001). The positive association between the TyG index and the restenosis after DCB was also determined in the fully adjusted model. The association was also reflected in all subgroups. Moreover, AUC of ROC showed that TyG index could provide predictive value for DCB‑Restenosisat baseline, both at baseline (AUC: 0.756, 95% CI 0.678 to 0.833, p < 0.001) and follow-up (AUC: 0.679, 95% CI 0.594 to 0.765, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An elevated TyG index was independently and positively correlated with the risk of restenosis in patients treated with DCB-only. The TyG index obtained both at baseline and at follow-up was predictive of restenosis after DCB, but the exact mechanism is unclear and requires further study.</p>","PeriodicalId":520583,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.70025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Drug-coated balloon (DCB) has become a common treatment, but restenosis may still occur after DCB. The association of the triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index with coronary atherosclerotic heart disease prognosis has been demonstrated. However, the relationship between the TyG index and restenosis after DCB-only remains unknown.

Aims: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the TyG index and restenosis after DCB-only.

Methods: The present study retrospectively recruited patients who underwent coronary angiography at 6-36 months after successful based DCB-only percutaneous coronary intervention. Subgroup analyses, correlation analyses, and, most importantly, a multivariate logistic regression analysis model were also constructed to assess the association between TyG index and restenosis after DCB treatment.

Results: A total of 173 patients received DCB-only therapy (58.22 ± 11.16 years of age, 74.6% male) were included in this study (mean follow-up time of 13.0 ± 7.7 months). The TyG index was higher in the restenosis group than in the non-restenosis group at both baseline (9.24 ± 0.73 vs. 8.65 ± 0.60, p < 0.001) and follow-up (9.00 ± 0.77 vs. 8.54 ± 0.55, p < 0.001). The positive association between the TyG index and the restenosis after DCB was also determined in the fully adjusted model. The association was also reflected in all subgroups. Moreover, AUC of ROC showed that TyG index could provide predictive value for DCB‑Restenosisat baseline, both at baseline (AUC: 0.756, 95% CI 0.678 to 0.833, p < 0.001) and follow-up (AUC: 0.679, 95% CI 0.594 to 0.765, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: An elevated TyG index was independently and positively correlated with the risk of restenosis in patients treated with DCB-only. The TyG index obtained both at baseline and at follow-up was predictive of restenosis after DCB, but the exact mechanism is unclear and requires further study.

甘油三酯-葡萄糖指数与冠状动脉疾病患者经皮药物包被球囊冠脉介入治疗后再狭窄相关
背景:药物包被球囊(Drug-coated balloon, DCB)已成为一种常见的治疗方法,但DCB后仍可能发生再狭窄。甘油三酯-葡萄糖(TyG)指数与冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病预后的关系已被证实。然而,TyG指数与DCB-only术后再狭窄之间的关系尚不清楚。目的:本研究旨在探讨TyG指数与dcb术后再狭窄的关系。方法:本研究回顾性招募在成功的DCB-only经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后6-36个月接受冠状动脉造影的患者。构建亚组分析、相关分析,最重要的是建立多变量logistic回归分析模型来评估TyG指数与DCB治疗后再狭窄之间的关系。结果:共纳入173例接受dcb治疗的患者(58.22±11.16岁,男性74.6%),平均随访时间13.0±7.7个月。再狭窄组的TyG指数高于非再狭窄组(9.24±0.73比8.65±0.60,p)。结论:单纯dcb治疗患者TyG指数升高与再狭窄风险独立正相关。基线和随访时获得的TyG指数可预测DCB后再狭窄,但确切机制尚不清楚,需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信