Hannah G Gordon, Richard J Hiscock, Alexis Shub, Jessica A Atkinson, Susan P Walker, Anna Forsythe, Amber L Kennedy, Parinaz Mehdipour, Stephen Tong, Roxanne M Hastie, Anthea C Lindquist
{"title":"Diabetes in Pregnancy and School-Age Developmental Outcomes for Offspring: A Statewide Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Hannah G Gordon, Richard J Hiscock, Alexis Shub, Jessica A Atkinson, Susan P Walker, Anna Forsythe, Amber L Kennedy, Parinaz Mehdipour, Stephen Tong, Roxanne M Hastie, Anthea C Lindquist","doi":"10.2337/dc25-0678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The impact of diabetes in pregnancy on offspring neurodevelopment is unclear. We investigate whether exposure to diabetes in utero is associated with developmental vulnerability or educational delay during primary school.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We used population-level pregnancy and birth data from 2009 to 2021 from Victoria, Australia, linked with standardized national assessments. Adjusting for a range of maternal and childhood covariates, we investigated whether diabetes in pregnancy was associated with an altered risk of developmental vulnerability compared with no diabetes in the first year of full-time school (ages 4-6 years), defined as below the tenth centile in two or more domains in the Australian Early Development Census (AEDC), and altered educational outcomes in grade 3 (ages 7-8 years), defined as the adjusted mean difference in overall z score in the National Assessment Program - Literacy and Numeracy test (NAPLAN).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study comprised 177,898 children who had linked birth and AEDC data, and 115,231 with linked birth and NAPLAN data, including, respectively, 16,363 (9.2%) and 7,532 (6.5%) exposed to diabetes in pregnancy. Following adjusted analysis, diabetes in pregnancy was not associated with an altered risk of overall developmental vulnerability compared with no diabetes (adjusted relative risk 1.02 [95% CI 0.98, 1.07]). Diabetes was associated with a marginally higher overall NAPLAN z score, but below the prespecified threshold for clinical significance (adjusted mean difference 0.04 [95% CI 0.01, 0.07]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Diabetes in pregnancy was not associated with overall developmental vulnerability or a clinically meaningful difference in educational outcomes. This should provide reassurance for patients and their treating clinicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":93979,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes care","volume":" ","pages":"1612-1621"},"PeriodicalIF":16.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12368389/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2337/dc25-0678","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The impact of diabetes in pregnancy on offspring neurodevelopment is unclear. We investigate whether exposure to diabetes in utero is associated with developmental vulnerability or educational delay during primary school.
Research design and methods: We used population-level pregnancy and birth data from 2009 to 2021 from Victoria, Australia, linked with standardized national assessments. Adjusting for a range of maternal and childhood covariates, we investigated whether diabetes in pregnancy was associated with an altered risk of developmental vulnerability compared with no diabetes in the first year of full-time school (ages 4-6 years), defined as below the tenth centile in two or more domains in the Australian Early Development Census (AEDC), and altered educational outcomes in grade 3 (ages 7-8 years), defined as the adjusted mean difference in overall z score in the National Assessment Program - Literacy and Numeracy test (NAPLAN).
Results: Our study comprised 177,898 children who had linked birth and AEDC data, and 115,231 with linked birth and NAPLAN data, including, respectively, 16,363 (9.2%) and 7,532 (6.5%) exposed to diabetes in pregnancy. Following adjusted analysis, diabetes in pregnancy was not associated with an altered risk of overall developmental vulnerability compared with no diabetes (adjusted relative risk 1.02 [95% CI 0.98, 1.07]). Diabetes was associated with a marginally higher overall NAPLAN z score, but below the prespecified threshold for clinical significance (adjusted mean difference 0.04 [95% CI 0.01, 0.07]).
Conclusions: Diabetes in pregnancy was not associated with overall developmental vulnerability or a clinically meaningful difference in educational outcomes. This should provide reassurance for patients and their treating clinicians.
目的:妊娠期糖尿病对子代神经发育的影响尚不清楚。我们调查是否暴露于子宫内糖尿病与发育脆弱性或小学教育延迟有关。研究设计和方法:我们使用了澳大利亚维多利亚州2009年至2021年的人口水平怀孕和出生数据,并与标准化的国家评估相关联。调整一系列母亲和儿童共变量后,我们调查了妊娠期糖尿病是否与全日制学校第一年(4-6岁)(定义为在澳大利亚早期发展普查(AEDC)中两个或两个以上领域低于十分之一百分位)的发育脆弱性风险改变以及三年级(7-8岁)的教育结果改变有关。定义为国家评估计划-识字和算术测试(NAPLAN)中z总分的调整后平均差异。结果:我们的研究包括177,898名出生和AEDC数据相关的儿童,115,231名出生和NAPLAN数据相关的儿童,分别包括16,363(9.2%)和7,532(6.5%)在怀孕期间暴露于糖尿病。经校正分析,与未患糖尿病的孕妇相比,妊娠期患糖尿病与整体发育易感性的改变风险无关(校正相对危险度1.02 [95% CI 0.98, 1.07])。糖尿病与总体NAPLAN z评分略高相关,但低于预先设定的临床意义阈值(调整后平均差异0.04 [95% CI 0.01, 0.07])。结论:妊娠期糖尿病与整体发育脆弱性或教育结果的临床意义差异无关。这应该为患者和治疗他们的临床医生提供保证。