The treatment of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: a review of current management options and a potential role for scrambler therapy.

IF 2.5 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) Pub Date : 2025-07-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpain.2025.1607102
Hassan Aboumerhi, Henry Vucetic, Andrew Gruenzel, Bahar Moftakhar, Mona Gupta, Santosh K Rao, Michael D Staudt
{"title":"The treatment of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: a review of current management options and a potential role for scrambler therapy.","authors":"Hassan Aboumerhi, Henry Vucetic, Andrew Gruenzel, Bahar Moftakhar, Mona Gupta, Santosh K Rao, Michael D Staudt","doi":"10.3389/fpain.2025.1607102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) presents a growing medical and financial burden on patients and the healthcare system alike. This has been treated with conservative and interventional care limited by efficacy, side effects, and lack of coverage. As such, there is an unmet treatment need for effective non-invasive or minimally invasive therapies for the treatment of CIPN. Scrambler therapy (ST) is a peripheral, non-invasive neuromodulation technique, which uses transcutaneous electrical stimulation to modulate pain signals. ST has shown mixed results in clinical trials; while some patients report symptom relief, more robust evidence is required before it can be widely recommended. This review article outlines the burden of CIPN and the current state of treatment, including pharmacological and interventional therapies. The emerging data on ST and its role in treating CIPN is highlighted, including a review of published observational and randomized controlled trials. We also discuss the gaps and challenges ahead in establishing this therapy as a standard of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":73097,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)","volume":"6 ","pages":"1607102"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12277255/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2025.1607102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) presents a growing medical and financial burden on patients and the healthcare system alike. This has been treated with conservative and interventional care limited by efficacy, side effects, and lack of coverage. As such, there is an unmet treatment need for effective non-invasive or minimally invasive therapies for the treatment of CIPN. Scrambler therapy (ST) is a peripheral, non-invasive neuromodulation technique, which uses transcutaneous electrical stimulation to modulate pain signals. ST has shown mixed results in clinical trials; while some patients report symptom relief, more robust evidence is required before it can be widely recommended. This review article outlines the burden of CIPN and the current state of treatment, including pharmacological and interventional therapies. The emerging data on ST and its role in treating CIPN is highlighted, including a review of published observational and randomized controlled trials. We also discuss the gaps and challenges ahead in establishing this therapy as a standard of care.

Abstract Image

化疗引起的周围神经病变的治疗:当前管理方案的回顾和扰频疗法的潜在作用。
化疗引起的周围神经病变(CIPN)给患者和医疗保健系统带来了越来越大的医疗和经济负担。由于疗效、副作用和缺乏覆盖范围,这种疾病一直采用保守治疗和介入性护理。因此,对于有效的非侵入性或微创治疗CIPN的治疗需求尚未得到满足。扰频器疗法(ST)是一种非侵入性外周神经调节技术,它使用经皮电刺激来调节疼痛信号。ST在临床试验中显示出喜忧参半的结果;虽然一些患者报告症状缓解,但在广泛推荐之前需要更有力的证据。这篇综述文章概述了CIPN的负担和目前的治疗状况,包括药物和介入治疗。关于ST及其在治疗CIPN中的作用的新数据被强调,包括对已发表的观察性和随机对照试验的回顾。我们还讨论了将这种疗法建立为标准治疗的差距和挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信