Comparison of the Peripapillary Structure-Vessel Density Relationship Before and After Axial Length Magnification Correction Using Different Methods.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Zhuoyan Yang, Yidan Wu, Jiaxin Gao, Shiyuan Hu, Jianming Wang, Ruihua Jing
{"title":"Comparison of the Peripapillary Structure-Vessel Density Relationship Before and After Axial Length Magnification Correction Using Different Methods.","authors":"Zhuoyan Yang, Yidan Wu, Jiaxin Gao, Shiyuan Hu, Jianming Wang, Ruihua Jing","doi":"10.1111/ceo.14585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate changes in OCTA-derived structural and vascular parameters before and after axial length (AL) magnification correction using two different formulas, and to explore their correlations with vessel density (VD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 45 high myopic eyes and 45 age- and gender-matched controls. Both 6 × 6 mm<sup>2</sup> optic nerve head imaging and biological measurement were performed using OCTA. Magnification correction was performed using both the Bennett formula and the device's built-in algorithm. Parameters analysed included retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) thickness, superficial vascular complex (SVC) VD, deep vascular complex (DVC) VD, and choroidal VD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In long AL eyes, uncorrected values underestimated RNFL thickness and SVC VD but overestimated DVC VD and choroidal VD; discrepancies increased with AL. The opposite pattern was observed in shorter eyes. After correction, all vascular parameters except DVC VD showed significant changes in the high myopia group, while non-high myopic eyes showed no significant differences. The two correction methods showed strong agreement across all layers. RNFL thickness correlated strongly with SVC VD, and choroidal thickness (CT) with choroidal VD, both before and after correction. Post-correction, AL was no longer associated with RNFL thickness or SVC VD, while its correlation with CT and choroidal VD persisted. Mediation analysis showed AL fully mediated the CT-choroidal VD relationship, with a stronger effect post-correction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Magnification correction is crucial in high myopic eyes. Both formulas showed high consistency. Correction eliminated AL's confounding effects on RNFL and SVC VD, while emphasising its mediating role between CT and choroidal VD.</p>","PeriodicalId":55253,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ceo.14585","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To evaluate changes in OCTA-derived structural and vascular parameters before and after axial length (AL) magnification correction using two different formulas, and to explore their correlations with vessel density (VD).

Methods: This study included 45 high myopic eyes and 45 age- and gender-matched controls. Both 6 × 6 mm2 optic nerve head imaging and biological measurement were performed using OCTA. Magnification correction was performed using both the Bennett formula and the device's built-in algorithm. Parameters analysed included retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) thickness, superficial vascular complex (SVC) VD, deep vascular complex (DVC) VD, and choroidal VD.

Results: In long AL eyes, uncorrected values underestimated RNFL thickness and SVC VD but overestimated DVC VD and choroidal VD; discrepancies increased with AL. The opposite pattern was observed in shorter eyes. After correction, all vascular parameters except DVC VD showed significant changes in the high myopia group, while non-high myopic eyes showed no significant differences. The two correction methods showed strong agreement across all layers. RNFL thickness correlated strongly with SVC VD, and choroidal thickness (CT) with choroidal VD, both before and after correction. Post-correction, AL was no longer associated with RNFL thickness or SVC VD, while its correlation with CT and choroidal VD persisted. Mediation analysis showed AL fully mediated the CT-choroidal VD relationship, with a stronger effect post-correction.

Conclusions: Magnification correction is crucial in high myopic eyes. Both formulas showed high consistency. Correction eliminated AL's confounding effects on RNFL and SVC VD, while emphasising its mediating role between CT and choroidal VD.

不同方法轴长矫正前后乳头周围结构-血管密度关系的比较。
研究背景:利用两种不同的计算公式评估轴向长度(AL)放大校正前后octa衍生的结构和血管参数的变化,并探讨其与血管密度(VD)的相关性。方法:本研究纳入45只高度近视眼和45只年龄和性别匹配的对照组。采用OCTA进行6 × 6 mm2视神经头成像和生物测量。使用Bennett公式和设备的内置算法进行放大率校正。分析参数包括视网膜神经纤维层(RNFL)厚度、浅血管复合体(SVC) VD、深血管复合体(DVC) VD和脉络膜VD。结果:在长AL眼中,未校正值低估了RNFL厚度和SVC VD,高估了DVC VD和脉络膜VD;这种差异随着AL的增加而增加。在较短的眼睛中观察到相反的模式。矫正后,高度近视组除DVC VD外,其他血管参数均有显著变化,非高度近视组无显著差异。两种校正方法在各层均表现出较强的一致性。在校正前后,RNFL厚度与SVC VD密切相关,脉络膜厚度(CT)与脉络膜VD密切相关。校正后,AL不再与RNFL厚度或SVC VD相关,但其与CT和脉络膜VD的相关性仍然存在。中介分析显示AL完全介导ct -脉络膜VD关系,校正后效果更强。结论:放大矫正是高度近视的关键。两种公式均具有较高的一致性。校正消除了AL对RNFL和SVC VD的混杂影响,同时强调了其在CT和脉络膜VD之间的中介作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
150
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology is the official journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original research and reviews dealing with all aspects of clinical practice and research which are international in scope and application. CEO recognises the importance of collaborative research and welcomes papers that have a direct influence on ophthalmic practice but are not unique to ophthalmology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信