Ariel Aminov, Lior Bangiev, Lukas Poskevicius, Gintaras Juodzbalys
{"title":"The Effect of Local Simvastatin on Alveolar Bone Regeneration, Pain, and Swelling After Tooth Extraction: a Systematic Review.","authors":"Ariel Aminov, Lior Bangiev, Lukas Poskevicius, Gintaras Juodzbalys","doi":"10.5037/jomr.2025.16204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this systematic literature review was to evaluate the effects of local simvastatin on alveolar bone regeneration, pain and swelling after tooth extraction, with a minimum follow-up of two months.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A literature search was conducted using PubMed (MEDLINE) database to identify studies published between January 2015 and January 2025 containing a minimum of 20 sockets per study to evaluate the effect of local simvastatin in promoting bone regeneration after tooth extraction. Data synthesis in test and control groups included following parameters: Extraction socket filling material and method, regenerated bone morphology, pain, and swelling. Quality and risk-of-bias assessment were evaluated by the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools. Descriptive statistics were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 628 articles were screened, with 6 articles meeting the inclusion criteria and being utilized for this review. A total of 326 sockets with different types were evaluated, the effect of local simvastatin on the morphology of regenerated bone showed statistically significant (P < 0.05) progressive improvement in most cases. Furthermore, pain and swelling assessments revealed a decrease in the test groups compared to the control groups suggesting that local simvastatin may promote bone regeneration while reducing post-treatment discomfort. However, different tools were used to measure regenerated bone morphology pain and swelling, making it hard to draw consistent conclusions about patient comfort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Local simvastatin application promotes bone regeneration without increasing pain or swelling, supporting its use as a safe and effective supplement in regenerative bone treatment after tooth extraction.</p>","PeriodicalId":53254,"journal":{"name":"eJournal of Oral Maxillofacial Research","volume":"16 2","pages":"e4"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12276082/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"eJournal of Oral Maxillofacial Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2025.16204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this systematic literature review was to evaluate the effects of local simvastatin on alveolar bone regeneration, pain and swelling after tooth extraction, with a minimum follow-up of two months.
Material and methods: A literature search was conducted using PubMed (MEDLINE) database to identify studies published between January 2015 and January 2025 containing a minimum of 20 sockets per study to evaluate the effect of local simvastatin in promoting bone regeneration after tooth extraction. Data synthesis in test and control groups included following parameters: Extraction socket filling material and method, regenerated bone morphology, pain, and swelling. Quality and risk-of-bias assessment were evaluated by the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools. Descriptive statistics were used.
Results: A total of 628 articles were screened, with 6 articles meeting the inclusion criteria and being utilized for this review. A total of 326 sockets with different types were evaluated, the effect of local simvastatin on the morphology of regenerated bone showed statistically significant (P < 0.05) progressive improvement in most cases. Furthermore, pain and swelling assessments revealed a decrease in the test groups compared to the control groups suggesting that local simvastatin may promote bone regeneration while reducing post-treatment discomfort. However, different tools were used to measure regenerated bone morphology pain and swelling, making it hard to draw consistent conclusions about patient comfort.
Conclusions: Local simvastatin application promotes bone regeneration without increasing pain or swelling, supporting its use as a safe and effective supplement in regenerative bone treatment after tooth extraction.