A Standardised Car Seat Transfer Test: Reliability and Concurrent Validity.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION
Occupational Therapy International Pub Date : 2025-07-14 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/oti/7306142
Tarcisio F de Campos, Mitchell Wolden, Marie K March, Deshitha Hewawasam, Brandon Boumelhem, Jessica J Spurr, James M Khoury, Nick Vertzyas, Steven G Faux, Gregory C Gass, Sean F Mungovan
{"title":"A Standardised Car Seat Transfer Test: Reliability and Concurrent Validity.","authors":"Tarcisio F de Campos, Mitchell Wolden, Marie K March, Deshitha Hewawasam, Brandon Boumelhem, Jessica J Spurr, James M Khoury, Nick Vertzyas, Steven G Faux, Gregory C Gass, Sean F Mungovan","doi":"10.1155/oti/7306142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Transferring effectively into and out of a vehicle seat is required for functional mobility and social participation. Reliable and valid vehicle and simulator car seat transfer tests are limited. The aim of this study was to assess the reliability and concurrent validity of a car seat transfer test for application with a vehicle and a simulator car seat. <b>Methods:</b> A cross-sectional study was conducted and reported according to the Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS), the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statements and the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research 2007. Consecutive healthy adults who expressed interest and met the inclusion criteria were recruited for our study. A standardised vehicle and simulator car seat transfer test was undertaken on two visits, 7 days apart. WOMAC, hip and knee active range of motion assessment, self-selected gait speed measurement and the five-repetition sit-to-stand test were undertaken on the first visit. <b>Results:</b> Complete data collection was performed with 42 healthy adults. There was good interrater (ICC = 0.99; 95% CI 0.99, 1.00), intrarater (ICC = 0.79; 95% CI 0.62, 0.89 to ICC = 0.91; 95% CI 0.76, 0.96) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.87; 95% CI 0.77, 0.93 to ICC = 0.94; 95% CI 0.89, 0.96) for car seat transfer test times for getting into and out of the vehicle and the simulator car seat. There were strong and significant correlations (<i>r</i> = 0.84-0.89) between the vehicle and simulator car seat test times; these times correlated significantly with measures of physical function including self-selected gait speed and five-repetition sit-to-stand test results (<i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusion:</b> A standardised car seat transfer test is reliable and valid for testing car seat transfer ability in a vehicle and a simulator car seat.</p>","PeriodicalId":49140,"journal":{"name":"Occupational Therapy International","volume":"2025 ","pages":"7306142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12279433/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational Therapy International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/oti/7306142","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Transferring effectively into and out of a vehicle seat is required for functional mobility and social participation. Reliable and valid vehicle and simulator car seat transfer tests are limited. The aim of this study was to assess the reliability and concurrent validity of a car seat transfer test for application with a vehicle and a simulator car seat. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted and reported according to the Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS), the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statements and the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research 2007. Consecutive healthy adults who expressed interest and met the inclusion criteria were recruited for our study. A standardised vehicle and simulator car seat transfer test was undertaken on two visits, 7 days apart. WOMAC, hip and knee active range of motion assessment, self-selected gait speed measurement and the five-repetition sit-to-stand test were undertaken on the first visit. Results: Complete data collection was performed with 42 healthy adults. There was good interrater (ICC = 0.99; 95% CI 0.99, 1.00), intrarater (ICC = 0.79; 95% CI 0.62, 0.89 to ICC = 0.91; 95% CI 0.76, 0.96) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.87; 95% CI 0.77, 0.93 to ICC = 0.94; 95% CI 0.89, 0.96) for car seat transfer test times for getting into and out of the vehicle and the simulator car seat. There were strong and significant correlations (r = 0.84-0.89) between the vehicle and simulator car seat test times; these times correlated significantly with measures of physical function including self-selected gait speed and five-repetition sit-to-stand test results (p < 0.001). Conclusion: A standardised car seat transfer test is reliable and valid for testing car seat transfer ability in a vehicle and a simulator car seat.

标准化汽车座椅转移测试:信度与同时效度。
导言:有效地进出车辆座椅是功能移动和社会参与所必需的。可靠和有效的车辆和模拟汽车座椅转移试验有限。本研究的目的是评估的信度和同时效度的汽车座椅转移测试的应用与车辆和模拟汽车座椅。方法:根据报告可靠性和一致性研究指南(GRRAS)、加强流行病学观察性研究报告(STROBE)声明和2007年国家人类研究伦理行为声明进行横断面研究并进行报告。我们招募了有兴趣且符合纳入标准的连续健康成人。标准化车辆和模拟汽车座椅转移试验进行了两次访问,间隔7天。首次就诊时进行WOMAC、髋关节和膝关节活动范围评估、自选步态速度测量和五次重复坐立测试。结果:对42名健康成人进行了完整的数据收集。有良好的判据(ICC = 0.99;95% CI 0.99, 1.00),内部人(ICC = 0.79;95% CI 0.62, 0.89至ICC = 0.91;95% CI 0.76, 0.96)和重测信度(ICC = 0.87;95% CI 0.77, 0.93至ICC = 0.94;95%可信区间为0.89,0.96),用于进出车辆和模拟汽车座椅的汽车座椅转移测试时间。车辆与模拟座椅试验次数呈显著相关性(r = 0.84 ~ 0.89);这些时间与身体功能测量显著相关,包括自我选择的步态速度和五次重复的坐姿站立测试结果(p < 0.001)。结论:标准化的汽车座椅转移试验可用于汽车座椅和模拟汽车座椅的转移能力测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
121
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Occupational Therapy International is a peer-reviewed journal, publishing manuscripts that reflect the practice of occupational therapy throughout the world. Research studies or original concept papers are considered for publication. Priority for publication will be given to research studies that provide recommendations for evidence-based practice and demonstrate the effectiveness of a specific treatment method. Single subject case studies evaluating treatment effectiveness are also encouraged. Other topics that are appropriate for the journal include reliability and validity of clinical instruments, assistive technology, community rehabilitation, cultural comparisons, health promotion and wellness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信