Comparison and validation of an immersive flight simulator using a virtual reality headset versus a professional simulator for novice pilots.

IF 2.4 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Johan Rendy, Isabelle Milleville-Pennel, Cédric Dumas, Thierry Lebourque
{"title":"Comparison and validation of an immersive flight simulator using a virtual reality headset versus a professional simulator for novice pilots.","authors":"Johan Rendy, Isabelle Milleville-Pennel, Cédric Dumas, Thierry Lebourque","doi":"10.1080/00140139.2025.2525956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to assess whether a low-cost flight simulator, using a virtual reality (VR) headset and specially adapted to the needs of novice pilots, could meet training expectations. This simulator was compared with a traditional professional flight simulator equipped with a CAVE projection room. The participants underwent flight training in one or other of the simulators and their performance was compared. Subjective evaluations showed high level of presence despite some dimensions about the feeling of presence sometimes indicates a difference in disfavour of the Headset simulator. Similar mental workload among participants was also observed as well as nearly comparable learning levels (flight performances) between the two systems. Our study demonstrated that a Headset simulator can provide an immersive and educational experience comparable to that of a Cockpit simulator. Thus, Headset simulator represent a viable and economically advantageous alternative to traditional Cockpit simulators for initial pilot training.</p>","PeriodicalId":50503,"journal":{"name":"Ergonomics","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2025.2525956","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess whether a low-cost flight simulator, using a virtual reality (VR) headset and specially adapted to the needs of novice pilots, could meet training expectations. This simulator was compared with a traditional professional flight simulator equipped with a CAVE projection room. The participants underwent flight training in one or other of the simulators and their performance was compared. Subjective evaluations showed high level of presence despite some dimensions about the feeling of presence sometimes indicates a difference in disfavour of the Headset simulator. Similar mental workload among participants was also observed as well as nearly comparable learning levels (flight performances) between the two systems. Our study demonstrated that a Headset simulator can provide an immersive and educational experience comparable to that of a Cockpit simulator. Thus, Headset simulator represent a viable and economically advantageous alternative to traditional Cockpit simulators for initial pilot training.

使用虚拟现实耳机的沉浸式飞行模拟器与针对新手飞行员的专业模拟器的比较和验证。
本研究的目的是评估一个低成本的飞行模拟器,使用虚拟现实(VR)耳机,特别适应新手飞行员的需求,是否可以满足培训期望。该模拟器与配备CAVE放映室的传统专业飞行模拟器进行了比较。参与者在一个或另一个模拟器中进行飞行训练,并比较他们的表现。主观评价显示高水平的存在,尽管存在感的一些维度有时表明对耳机模拟器的不赞成的差异。在两种系统之间,参与者之间也观察到相似的精神负荷以及几乎相当的学习水平(飞行表现)。我们的研究表明,耳机模拟器可以提供与驾驶舱模拟器相当的身临其境的教育体验。因此,耳机模拟器代表了一个可行的和经济上有利的替代传统的座舱模拟器的初始飞行员培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ergonomics
Ergonomics 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
147
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Ergonomics, also known as human factors, is the scientific discipline that seeks to understand and improve human interactions with products, equipment, environments and systems. Drawing upon human biology, psychology, engineering and design, Ergonomics aims to develop and apply knowledge and techniques to optimise system performance, whilst protecting the health, safety and well-being of individuals involved. The attention of ergonomics extends across work, leisure and other aspects of our daily lives. The journal Ergonomics is an international refereed publication, with a 60 year tradition of disseminating high quality research. Original submissions, both theoretical and applied, are invited from across the subject, including physical, cognitive, organisational and environmental ergonomics. Papers reporting the findings of research from cognate disciplines are also welcome, where these contribute to understanding equipment, tasks, jobs, systems and environments and the corresponding needs, abilities and limitations of people. All published research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by independent expert referees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信