Psychiatrists' Awareness and Use of Voluntary Self-Prohibition as a Firearm Suicide Prevention Tool in Virginia.

IF 1.6 4区 哲学 Q2 ETHICS
Bryan Barks, Shannon Frattaroli, Paul S Nestadt
{"title":"Psychiatrists' Awareness and Use of Voluntary Self-Prohibition as a Firearm Suicide Prevention Tool in Virginia.","authors":"Bryan Barks, Shannon Frattaroli, Paul S Nestadt","doi":"10.1017/jme.2025.10125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Voluntary self-prohibition (VSP) is a suicide prevention policy that allows individuals who recognize their risk for suicide to voluntarily prevent themselves from purchasing firearms through systems requiring background checks. It is unclear whether psychiatrists are aware of this suicide prevention tool or when to recommend it appropriately.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To evaluate Virginia psychiatrists' awareness and use of VSP alongside Substantial Risk Orders (SROs) to inform policy and practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A convenience sample of Virginia psychiatrists was surveyed on knowledge and use of VSP and SRO, including vignettes of patients at varying risk levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-three psychiatrists completed the survey. Most (66.7%) were unaware of VSP or SRO. After brief education, 74.1% of respondents chose VSP in the vignette where it was most strongly indicated and 72.2% chose SRO in the vignette where it was most strongly indicated. After learning about VSP, 83% agreed or strongly agreed that VSP could be a useful tool.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The sample was small and did not collect certain information which may have provided additional insight into respondents' choices.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>After brief education, most respondents found VSP potentially useful. Ensuring knowledge of VSP and SRO may improve the uptake of both policies and suicide prevention efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":50165,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jme.2025.10125","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Voluntary self-prohibition (VSP) is a suicide prevention policy that allows individuals who recognize their risk for suicide to voluntarily prevent themselves from purchasing firearms through systems requiring background checks. It is unclear whether psychiatrists are aware of this suicide prevention tool or when to recommend it appropriately.

Aims: To evaluate Virginia psychiatrists' awareness and use of VSP alongside Substantial Risk Orders (SROs) to inform policy and practice.

Methods: A convenience sample of Virginia psychiatrists was surveyed on knowledge and use of VSP and SRO, including vignettes of patients at varying risk levels.

Results: Sixty-three psychiatrists completed the survey. Most (66.7%) were unaware of VSP or SRO. After brief education, 74.1% of respondents chose VSP in the vignette where it was most strongly indicated and 72.2% chose SRO in the vignette where it was most strongly indicated. After learning about VSP, 83% agreed or strongly agreed that VSP could be a useful tool.

Limitations: The sample was small and did not collect certain information which may have provided additional insight into respondents' choices.

Conclusion: After brief education, most respondents found VSP potentially useful. Ensuring knowledge of VSP and SRO may improve the uptake of both policies and suicide prevention efforts.

精神科医生的意识和使用自愿自我禁止作为枪支自杀预防工具在弗吉尼亚州。
背景:自愿自我禁止(VSP)是一项自杀预防政策,允许认识到自己有自杀风险的个人通过要求背景调查的系统自愿阻止自己购买枪支。目前尚不清楚精神科医生是否意识到这种自杀预防工具,或者何时适当地推荐它。目的:评估弗吉尼亚州精神科医生对VSP和实质性风险令(sro)的认识和使用,为政策和实践提供信息。方法:对弗吉尼亚州精神科医生的VSP和SRO知识和使用情况进行调查,包括不同风险水平患者的小样本。结果:63名精神病医生完成了调查。大多数(66.7%)不知道VSP或SRO。经过简短的教育,74.1%的受访者选择了VSP在小品中,它是最强烈的指示和72.2%的选择SRO在小品中,它是最强烈的指示。在了解VSP后,83%的人同意或强烈同意VSP可能是一个有用的工具。局限性:样本很小,没有收集到某些信息,这些信息可能会为受访者的选择提供额外的见解。结论:经过简短的教育,大多数受访者发现VSP可能有用。确保VSP和SRO的知识可以提高政策和自杀预防工作的吸收。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics
Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics 医学-医学:法
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
70
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Material published in The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics (JLME) contributes to the educational mission of The American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, covering public health, health disparities, patient safety and quality of care, and biomedical science and research. It provides articles on such timely topics as health care quality and access, managed care, pain relief, genetics, child/maternal health, reproductive health, informed consent, assisted dying, ethics committees, HIV/AIDS, and public health. Symposium issues review significant policy developments, health law court decisions, and books.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信