Ocular measures of controlled processing: Examining the use of proactive cognitive control in the AX-CPT.

IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Jason F Reimer, Kevin P Rosales, Anthony Sierra, Kyle Mobly, Andrew Rivera
{"title":"Ocular measures of controlled processing: Examining the use of proactive cognitive control in the AX-CPT.","authors":"Jason F Reimer, Kevin P Rosales, Anthony Sierra, Kyle Mobly, Andrew Rivera","doi":"10.3758/s13421-025-01744-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Assessing the use of proactive cognitive control is essential for understanding how thoughts and actions are regulated. The present study aimed to determine whether proactive control can be measured through patterns of eye movements during the cue-probe delay in a spatially modified AX-CPT. Across two experiments, we found that gaze activity at screen locations where cues and probes appeared predicted both the extent of proactive control adopted by participants and their ability to override a prepotent response tendency. However, the specific cognitive processes underlying the engagement of proactive control varied depending on task demands. Specifically, when the cue-probe delay was relatively short (Experiment 1), proactive control was characterized by rapid shifts in visual attention to support cognitive demands associated with frequent changes in the location of probe stimuli. In contrast, when the cue-probe delay was extended (Experiment 2), proactive control aligned with traditional conceptualizations, relying more on increased cue maintenance. Together, these results demonstrate that eye-movement patterns may serve as the foundation for ocular-based measures of proactive control, enabling further investigation into factors influencing its engagement and potential individual differences in its use. Implications that the results have for theories of controlled processing and inhibitory control are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48398,"journal":{"name":"Memory & Cognition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Memory & Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-025-01744-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Assessing the use of proactive cognitive control is essential for understanding how thoughts and actions are regulated. The present study aimed to determine whether proactive control can be measured through patterns of eye movements during the cue-probe delay in a spatially modified AX-CPT. Across two experiments, we found that gaze activity at screen locations where cues and probes appeared predicted both the extent of proactive control adopted by participants and their ability to override a prepotent response tendency. However, the specific cognitive processes underlying the engagement of proactive control varied depending on task demands. Specifically, when the cue-probe delay was relatively short (Experiment 1), proactive control was characterized by rapid shifts in visual attention to support cognitive demands associated with frequent changes in the location of probe stimuli. In contrast, when the cue-probe delay was extended (Experiment 2), proactive control aligned with traditional conceptualizations, relying more on increased cue maintenance. Together, these results demonstrate that eye-movement patterns may serve as the foundation for ocular-based measures of proactive control, enabling further investigation into factors influencing its engagement and potential individual differences in its use. Implications that the results have for theories of controlled processing and inhibitory control are discussed.

控制性加工的眼部测量:在AX-CPT中检查主动认知控制的使用。
评估主动认知控制的使用对于理解思想和行为是如何被调节的至关重要。本研究旨在确定主动控制是否可以通过空间修饰的AX-CPT在线索-探针延迟期间的眼动模式来测量。在两个实验中,我们发现在屏幕上出现线索和探针的位置的凝视活动预测了参与者采用的主动控制的程度和他们克服优势反应倾向的能力。然而,参与主动控制的具体认知过程因任务需求而异。具体来说,当线索-探针延迟相对较短时(实验1),主动控制的特征是视觉注意快速转移以支持与探针刺激位置频繁变化相关的认知需求。相反,当线索-探测延迟延长时(实验2),主动控制与传统概念一致,更多地依赖于增加的线索维护。总之,这些结果表明,眼动模式可以作为基于眼的主动控制措施的基础,从而可以进一步研究影响其参与的因素和潜在的个体差异。讨论了这些结果对控制加工和抑制控制理论的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Memory & Cognition
Memory & Cognition PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: Memory & Cognition covers human memory and learning, conceptual processes, psycholinguistics, problem solving, thinking, decision making, and skilled performance, including relevant work in the areas of computer simulation, information processing, mathematical psychology, developmental psychology, and experimental social psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信