An exploratory mixed-methods questionnaire study investigating motivators for and reservations about clinical research participation in people living with HIV.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Claire Petersen, M Wood, F Dransfield, M Grundy-Bowers, G Clunie, A Winston
{"title":"An exploratory mixed-methods questionnaire study investigating motivators for and reservations about clinical research participation in people living with HIV.","authors":"Claire Petersen, M Wood, F Dransfield, M Grundy-Bowers, G Clunie, A Winston","doi":"10.1080/09540121.2025.2534531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical research in healthcare settings offers substantial benefits, including reduced mortality rates in research-active hospitals and access to novel treatments for participants. Despite these advantages, research often faces recruitment challenges, particularly under-representation of women and ethnic minorities. This study explores the views of people living with HIV regarding research participation. This mixed-methods study was conducted at a central London hospital's HIV outpatient clinic and Clinical Trials Centre from April 2018 to January 2019. Using the COM-B models as a theoretical framework, questionnaires were designed for individuals currently or previously involved in research, and for those with no prior research involvement. Questions included demographics, motivators and reservations about research participation, and the importance of information sources when deciding to participate in research. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively, and a framework analysis of qualitative data was completed. Of the 155 respondents, 50 were participating in research, and 105 were not. Key motivators included advancing medical knowledge, altruism and access to new treatments. Major barriers were time commitments and concerns about side effects. 80% of people participating in research, and 74% of those not participating rating rated discussions with regular clinicians to be very important when deciding to participate in research. Women faced similar barriers to the overall cohort, particularly related to time commitments and care-giving responsibilities. Research participation is influenced by the therapeutic relationship with, and input from regular clinicians. Addressing barriers such as time commitments through flexible scheduling, integrating research and clinical visits, and utilising remote visits could improve recruitment. Involving patients in research design via Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) ensures protocols are acceptable and tailored to participant needs. Effective collaboration between researchers and clinicians is essential to optimise research recruitment. Clear, empathetic communication and flexible study designs can address participant concerns, ultimately enhancing involvement in clinical research.</p>","PeriodicalId":48370,"journal":{"name":"Aids Care-Psychological and Socio-Medical Aspects of Aids/hiv","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aids Care-Psychological and Socio-Medical Aspects of Aids/hiv","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2025.2534531","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinical research in healthcare settings offers substantial benefits, including reduced mortality rates in research-active hospitals and access to novel treatments for participants. Despite these advantages, research often faces recruitment challenges, particularly under-representation of women and ethnic minorities. This study explores the views of people living with HIV regarding research participation. This mixed-methods study was conducted at a central London hospital's HIV outpatient clinic and Clinical Trials Centre from April 2018 to January 2019. Using the COM-B models as a theoretical framework, questionnaires were designed for individuals currently or previously involved in research, and for those with no prior research involvement. Questions included demographics, motivators and reservations about research participation, and the importance of information sources when deciding to participate in research. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively, and a framework analysis of qualitative data was completed. Of the 155 respondents, 50 were participating in research, and 105 were not. Key motivators included advancing medical knowledge, altruism and access to new treatments. Major barriers were time commitments and concerns about side effects. 80% of people participating in research, and 74% of those not participating rating rated discussions with regular clinicians to be very important when deciding to participate in research. Women faced similar barriers to the overall cohort, particularly related to time commitments and care-giving responsibilities. Research participation is influenced by the therapeutic relationship with, and input from regular clinicians. Addressing barriers such as time commitments through flexible scheduling, integrating research and clinical visits, and utilising remote visits could improve recruitment. Involving patients in research design via Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) ensures protocols are acceptable and tailored to participant needs. Effective collaboration between researchers and clinicians is essential to optimise research recruitment. Clear, empathetic communication and flexible study designs can address participant concerns, ultimately enhancing involvement in clinical research.

一项探索性混合方法问卷研究,调查艾滋病毒感染者参与临床研究的动机和保留意见。
医疗保健机构的临床研究提供了实质性的好处,包括在研究活跃的医院降低死亡率,并为参与者提供新的治疗方法。尽管有这些优势,研究经常面临招聘挑战,特别是女性和少数民族代表性不足。本研究探讨了艾滋病毒感染者对参与研究的看法。这项混合方法研究于2018年4月至2019年1月在伦敦市中心一家医院的艾滋病毒门诊诊所和临床试验中心进行。使用COM-B模型作为理论框架,问卷设计针对目前或以前参与研究的个人,以及之前没有参与研究的个人。问题包括人口统计、参与研究的动机和保留意见,以及决定参与研究时信息来源的重要性。对定量数据进行描述性分析,对定性数据进行框架分析。在155名受访者中,50人参与了研究,105人没有参与。主要的激励因素包括推进医学知识、利他主义和获得新疗法。主要的障碍是时间承诺和对副作用的担忧。80%参与研究的人和74%未参与研究的人认为,在决定参与研究时,与常规临床医生的讨论非常重要。妇女面临着与整个队列类似的障碍,特别是在时间承诺和照顾责任方面。研究参与受到与常规临床医生的治疗关系和输入的影响。通过灵活的日程安排、整合研究和临床访问以及利用远程访问来解决诸如时间承诺等障碍可以改善招聘。通过患者和公众参与和参与(PPIE)让患者参与研究设计,确保方案是可接受的,并根据参与者的需求量身定制。研究人员和临床医生之间的有效合作对于优化研究招聘至关重要。清晰、移情的沟通和灵活的研究设计可以解决参与者的担忧,最终提高临床研究的参与度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
172
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信