Development and validation of a nomogram model to predict postoperative delirium after resection of esophageal cancer.

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Xia Shen, Long Yang, Lei Jiang, Qian Wang, Yuan-Yuan Liu, Shao-Zheng Song, Jian-Feng Zhang, Ping Cai, Zhun-Zhun Liu
{"title":"Development and validation of a nomogram model to predict postoperative delirium after resection of esophageal cancer.","authors":"Xia Shen, Long Yang, Lei Jiang, Qian Wang, Yuan-Yuan Liu, Shao-Zheng Song, Jian-Feng Zhang, Ping Cai, Zhun-Zhun Liu","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-11255-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The study aimed to establish and validate a nomogram model to predict postoperative delirium (POD) among esophageal cancer resection patients. Clinical data of 396 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent esophagectomy from November 2020 to June 2023 in the electronic medical records of cardiothoracic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University. Participants were randomly divided into training and testing sets in a 7:3 ratio. Predictors were screened by Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis and a nomogram model was built. The discrimination and consistency of the model were evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), C-statistic, Brier score, Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, calibration curve and decision curve analysis (DCA). The results were validated using 1000 bootstraps resampling internal validation and testing set. Among 32 potential predictors, the final prediction model included 6 variables: postoperative pain, postoperative infection, dexmedetomidine use, propofol use, duration of mechanical ventilation, and Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI). The model showed a good discrimination with an AUC of 0.919 (95% CI: 0.885- 0.953) in the training set, and adjusted to 0.911 (95% CI: 0.878- 0.944) and 0.871 (95% CI: 0.802- 0.940) in the internal validation and the testing set, respectively. ROC curves, calibration curves, DCA curves, C-statistic, Brier score and Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test showed excellent model performance. This study successfully established and validated the first POD prediction model for patients with esophageal cancer resection. It could accurately predict the occurrence of POD and effectively identify the high-risk patients, which is of great significance for improving the risk stratification of the population and for implementing targeted prevention intervention measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"26394"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12280112/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-11255-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study aimed to establish and validate a nomogram model to predict postoperative delirium (POD) among esophageal cancer resection patients. Clinical data of 396 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent esophagectomy from November 2020 to June 2023 in the electronic medical records of cardiothoracic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University. Participants were randomly divided into training and testing sets in a 7:3 ratio. Predictors were screened by Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis and a nomogram model was built. The discrimination and consistency of the model were evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), C-statistic, Brier score, Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, calibration curve and decision curve analysis (DCA). The results were validated using 1000 bootstraps resampling internal validation and testing set. Among 32 potential predictors, the final prediction model included 6 variables: postoperative pain, postoperative infection, dexmedetomidine use, propofol use, duration of mechanical ventilation, and Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI). The model showed a good discrimination with an AUC of 0.919 (95% CI: 0.885- 0.953) in the training set, and adjusted to 0.911 (95% CI: 0.878- 0.944) and 0.871 (95% CI: 0.802- 0.940) in the internal validation and the testing set, respectively. ROC curves, calibration curves, DCA curves, C-statistic, Brier score and Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test showed excellent model performance. This study successfully established and validated the first POD prediction model for patients with esophageal cancer resection. It could accurately predict the occurrence of POD and effectively identify the high-risk patients, which is of great significance for improving the risk stratification of the population and for implementing targeted prevention intervention measures.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

食管癌术后谵妄的nomogram预测模型的建立与验证。
本研究旨在建立并验证一种预测食管癌切除术后谵妄(POD)的nomogram模型。江南大学附属医院心胸外科电子病历中2020年11月至2023年6月396例食管癌行食管切除术患者的临床资料。参与者按7:3的比例随机分为训练组和测试组。通过最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)回归分析筛选预测因子,并建立nomogram模型。采用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)、c统计量(C-statistic)、Brier评分、Hosmer-Lemeshow拟合优度检验、校正曲线和决策曲线分析(DCA)评价模型的鉴别性和一致性。使用1000个bootstrap重新采样内部验证和测试集对结果进行验证。在32个潜在预测因素中,最终的预测模型包括6个变量:术后疼痛、术后感染、右美托咪定使用、异丙酚使用、机械通气持续时间和预后营养指数(PNI)。该模型在训练集中具有良好的判别性,AUC为0.919 (95% CI: 0.885 ~ 0.953),在内部验证和测试集中分别调整为0.911 (95% CI: 0.878 ~ 0.944)和0.871 (95% CI: 0.802 ~ 0.940)。ROC曲线、校正曲线、DCA曲线、c统计量、Brier评分和Hosmer-Lemeshow拟合优度检验均表现出良好的模型性能。本研究成功建立并验证了首个食管癌切除术患者POD预测模型。能够准确预测POD的发生,有效识别高危患者,对改善人群风险分层,实施有针对性的预防干预措施具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信