A Pilot Study of Virtual Reality in Hemodialysis for Mitigating Pain and Anxiety: User Experiences and Perceptions.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Patient preference and adherence Pub Date : 2025-07-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PPA.S517622
Solmar Rodríguez de Galvis, Elena Guerrero Rodríguez, Julia Audije-Gil, Sandra Hernández Hernández, Marta Argilés-Huguet, Ana Botella, Marina Burgos Villulas, Ana Casaux-Huertas, Isabel González Sánchez, María Teresa Marín López, Paula Manso, David Hernán, Fabiola Dapena, María Dolores Arenas Jiménez
{"title":"A Pilot Study of Virtual Reality in Hemodialysis for Mitigating Pain and Anxiety: User Experiences and Perceptions.","authors":"Solmar Rodríguez de Galvis, Elena Guerrero Rodríguez, Julia Audije-Gil, Sandra Hernández Hernández, Marta Argilés-Huguet, Ana Botella, Marina Burgos Villulas, Ana Casaux-Huertas, Isabel González Sánchez, María Teresa Marín López, Paula Manso, David Hernán, Fabiola Dapena, María Dolores Arenas Jiménez","doi":"10.2147/PPA.S517622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Virtual reality (VR) helps control symptoms during procedures in chronic patients. This study analyzes VR's effect on pain and anxiety in hemodialysis (HD) patients at two points: the vascular access puncture and disconnection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective, non-randomized, crossover, multicenter pilot study assessing pre- and post-intervention outcomes with VR headsets. The intervention group used VR for up to 13 sessions, around the puncture, and at the end of the session. Pain was measured with the Faces Pain Scale - Revised (FPS-R) and anxiety with the Visual Analogue Scale for Anxiety (VAS-A). Usability and patient satisfaction with VR were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 73 patients (66.2 ± 13.3 years, 67% men) were included. At the start, 8.2% declined to wear the VR headset. The average number of sessions with the headset was 6.5 ± 4.8, with 23.3% completing all 13 sessions. Pain during punctures significantly improved with VR (1.26 vs 0.97; p = 0.039), while anxiety improved non-significantly. Anxiety during disconnection slightly increased, but also not significantly. Patients with higher initial pain and anxiety levels during puncture and disconnection showed significant improvement, while those with lower initial levels worsened (p < 0.05 in all cases). The HD population showed varying levels of acceptance of VR.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>VR headsets help reduce pain during punctures, especially in patients with more intense pain. The effect on anxiety reduction during punctures or at the end of the session is inconclusive, with better results in those with higher anxiety levels. VR acceptance in the HD population is variable.</p>","PeriodicalId":19972,"journal":{"name":"Patient preference and adherence","volume":"19 ","pages":"2069-2079"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12279062/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient preference and adherence","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S517622","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Virtual reality (VR) helps control symptoms during procedures in chronic patients. This study analyzes VR's effect on pain and anxiety in hemodialysis (HD) patients at two points: the vascular access puncture and disconnection.

Methods: A prospective, non-randomized, crossover, multicenter pilot study assessing pre- and post-intervention outcomes with VR headsets. The intervention group used VR for up to 13 sessions, around the puncture, and at the end of the session. Pain was measured with the Faces Pain Scale - Revised (FPS-R) and anxiety with the Visual Analogue Scale for Anxiety (VAS-A). Usability and patient satisfaction with VR were also evaluated.

Results: A total of 73 patients (66.2 ± 13.3 years, 67% men) were included. At the start, 8.2% declined to wear the VR headset. The average number of sessions with the headset was 6.5 ± 4.8, with 23.3% completing all 13 sessions. Pain during punctures significantly improved with VR (1.26 vs 0.97; p = 0.039), while anxiety improved non-significantly. Anxiety during disconnection slightly increased, but also not significantly. Patients with higher initial pain and anxiety levels during puncture and disconnection showed significant improvement, while those with lower initial levels worsened (p < 0.05 in all cases). The HD population showed varying levels of acceptance of VR.

Conclusion: VR headsets help reduce pain during punctures, especially in patients with more intense pain. The effect on anxiety reduction during punctures or at the end of the session is inconclusive, with better results in those with higher anxiety levels. VR acceptance in the HD population is variable.

虚拟现实在血液透析中缓解疼痛和焦虑的初步研究:用户体验和感知。
背景:虚拟现实(VR)有助于控制慢性患者手术过程中的症状。本研究分析了VR对血液透析(HD)患者疼痛和焦虑的影响,从两个点:血管通路穿刺和断开。方法:一项前瞻性、非随机、交叉、多中心的试点研究,评估VR头显干预前后的结果。干预组在穿刺前后和治疗结束时使用VR长达13次。疼痛用面部疼痛量表-修订版(FPS-R)测量,焦虑用焦虑视觉模拟量表(VAS-A)测量。对VR的可用性和患者满意度也进行了评估。结果:共纳入73例患者(66.2±13.3岁,男性67%)。一开始,8.2%的人拒绝佩戴VR头显。使用耳机的平均次数为6.5±4.8次,23.3%的人完成了所有13次会话。VR显著改善穿刺疼痛(1.26 vs 0.97;P = 0.039),而焦虑无显著改善。断网期间的焦虑略有增加,但也不显著。穿刺和断开时初始疼痛和焦虑水平较高的患者有明显改善,初始疼痛和焦虑水平较低的患者有明显恶化(p < 0.05)。高清人群对虚拟现实的接受程度各不相同。结论:VR头戴设备有助于减轻穿刺时的疼痛,特别是对疼痛较剧烈的患者。在穿刺期间或治疗结束时对减少焦虑的影响尚无定论,焦虑水平较高的患者效果更好。高清人群对VR的接受程度是不同的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Patient preference and adherence
Patient preference and adherence MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
354
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Patient Preference and Adherence is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the growing importance of patient preference and adherence throughout the therapeutic continuum. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research, modeling and clinical studies across all therapeutic areas. Patient satisfaction, acceptability, quality of life, compliance, persistence and their role in developing new therapeutic modalities and compounds to optimize clinical outcomes for existing disease states are major areas of interest for the journal. As of 1st April 2019, Patient Preference and Adherence will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信